Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Cammed '10 SS vs 2012 5.0 vs C6 Grand Sport *video*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2012, 10:32 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Cammed '10 SS vs 2012 5.0 vs C6 Grand Sport *video*

I was just sent the video to edit it, wasn't there at the time. I was told the Camaro didn't come around the Mustang until 130+mph, Corvette went by both of them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xydd-127n-o
Old 01-02-2012, 10:43 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

looked like a late hit for both the chevys.
Old 01-02-2012, 10:54 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

From look of video don't look like the camaro ever came around. And the 5.0 and GS looked neck and neck. Like to see a video of them together by them selves.

Also mods on 5.0. So just tune.cold air. and off road x pipe? It says exhaust what a cat back? Cause if it has headers it needs retuned if only made 390whp.
Old 01-02-2012, 10:56 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
Also mods on 5.0. So just tune.cold air. and off road x pipe? It says exhaust what a cat back? Cause if it has headers it needs retuned if only made 390whp.
Learn to read. It says "intake, tune, x-pipe, axleback".....none of these are headers.
Old 01-02-2012, 10:57 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
glennster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, was thinking also 390 was low and maybe camaro is saying higher then it has.
Old 01-02-2012, 11:00 PM
  #6  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
Learn to read. It says "intake, tune, x-pipe, axleback".....none of these are headers.
My bad dick read it wrong. Either way that is still low for them mods. Many with those mods alone have made 415whp and 390-400wtq.
Old 01-02-2012, 11:01 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Both cars dyno'd on the same dyno I believe. Mustang was for dyno'd on a Mustang dyno, pretty sure Camaro was the same place.
Old 01-02-2012, 11:01 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by glennster
Yeah, was thinking also 390 was low and maybe camaro is saying higher then it has.
Maybe he has more then he says? 480 seems high for cam only.
Old 01-02-2012, 11:03 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
Both cars dyno'd on the same dyno I believe. Mustang was for dyno'd on a Mustang dyno, pretty sure Camaro was the same place.
That helps explain the low numbers. Seems they always read lower then a dyno jet.
Old 01-03-2012, 12:28 AM
  #10  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow that mustang was impressive. looks believeable if the camaro was at full weight and the mustang maybe a couple hundred lbs. lighter than stock. cool race!
Old 01-03-2012, 12:55 AM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
wow that mustang was impressive. looks believeable if the camaro was at full weight and the mustang maybe a couple hundred lbs. lighter than stock. cool race!
Depending was trim level it is and the camaro is could already be as much as a 400lb weight difference between the two stock.
Old 01-03-2012, 03:08 AM
  #12  
Launching!
 
Killemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

100 to the wheels isa 100 to the wheels.

Hopefully well get better vidz of these beaste. Has a lot of potential
Old 01-03-2012, 04:32 AM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
41863nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks to me that the mustang got the hit, like HioSSilver said...nice video WSsick...thanks
Old 01-03-2012, 08:01 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ya the stang got the hit, it was moving out for sure though. That camaro still pulled that hit back, I thought that was pretty clear by the end. The better race on the street would be the vette and the camaro. Also if you notice the stang starts at lest a half a car in front of the camaro and even the vette looks to be sitting behind a bit at the very start of the race. Take the hit back from the stang and start even and the stang gets smoked by both... just saying LOL
Old 01-03-2012, 08:59 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here we go again! WOOOOOOOOOO SRK!!!
Old 01-03-2012, 09:10 AM
  #16  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
Hopefully well get better vidz of these beaste. Has a lot of potential
Probably not. Camaro is tucked away for winter, but both of them freaked out when this was posted in a Facebook group, and asked for it to be taken down. Camaro guy even asked a friend why it was recorded....
Old 01-03-2012, 09:22 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
CamaroSS27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Man I would cammed camaro cant even beat a 5.0? whats this world coming to!
Old 01-03-2012, 09:53 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Video would of been better if the camera was at the side of road wating on them to pass..
Old 01-03-2012, 11:47 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
midevil1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Lil' 5.0's kickin" ***. I love it. Stock internal 300ci engine whoopin on a 376ci Engines with CAMS and bolt ons?. RESPECT.

I have built and raced EVERYTHING. I will not buy anything new from a car company that needs a WELFARE check to stay in business. Sorry guys but Gm and Chrysler are literally eating out of Ford's *** with a spoon. The Mustang is DAMN Sexy car and the Camaro look like the bastard morphidite child of a Cadillac and a Jaguar..
Old 01-03-2012, 11:52 AM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Someone should tell this guy the 5.0 was gettin pulled by both after jumping.


Quick Reply: Cammed '10 SS vs 2012 5.0 vs C6 Grand Sport *video*



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.