Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mids Vs. LT's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2004, 08:30 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
ohhiitznik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester Hills Michigan
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Mids Vs. LT's

Pros and cons. I did a search but couldnt really find what I'm looking for. I'm going with a MTI stealth cam I/II. I cant really see that big of a difference in MIDS and LT's Can someone please explain why LT's are that much better for cammed motors?
Old 03-16-2004, 08:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

they let the air flow out better and cause less restriction. do it right the first time and get full lengths, u get a little more power and a nice sound too
Old 03-16-2004, 09:09 PM
  #3  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,040
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

No real difference in power in the higher rpms or at peak; a little more power in the lower rpms with LTs. You'll get more mid-range and low end TQ out of the LTs though.

Nothing wrong with going mids. No clearance issues, no banging on floor boards, and much less chance of front O2 sensor heater codes from mids (I haven't had a code in the 2 years I've had them) than LTs also. I'm VERY happy I went with mids after seeing some of the issues my friends have been through with LTs (both with install and ground clearance & floor board banging issues).
Old 03-16-2004, 09:13 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
Tally TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tallahassee, Fl
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

lt give you more low end, top end will be the same
Old 03-16-2004, 09:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have no issues with my lt's fit great and all. i was thinkin about some macs but i went with pacesetters when they were still real cheap. i do get heater codes on the driver side. gonna replace the o2s but it may be cause im taped into that wire for the a/f gauge
Old 03-16-2004, 09:56 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
ohhiitznik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester Hills Michigan
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
i have no issues with my lt's fit great and all. i was thinkin about some macs but i went with pacesetters when they were still real cheap. i do get heater codes on the driver side. gonna replace the o2s but it may be cause im taped into that wire for the a/f gauge

No egr/air for me and no rear O2's michigan ROX! anwyay i decided to go with pacesetters due to the fact they scavenge better, And ill be running true duals Pacesetter y pipe!
Old 03-16-2004, 09:58 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

yeah i took off all my stuff, nc sucks just rocks that i can inspect cars lol
Old 03-16-2004, 10:05 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
wfols1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 42
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I thought the LT provide more Mid to High end power and Shortys give you more Low to Mid...This has been my experience.

With the LTs you WILL produce more TQ on the big end.

Which is what propells your car down the 1320.

I had BBK shorties on my 2001 Z06 and my buddy had the FLPs LTs on his 2002 Z06 I had 8ft Lbs TQ less and 1.5 HP more than him,I had a Borla Catback up against his Stock Catback.

This is just my opinion.
Old 03-16-2004, 10:08 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,040
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

High end power is basically the same for mids and LTs. Actually, some people have made MORE high end power with mids than LTs.
Old 03-16-2004, 11:27 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Um, LTs make more power down low with the mids catching up near the top. A set of MACs with the collector mod and some clean up on the welds will flow pretty damn well. I've had both and yes, I now am running LTs, but have no complaints about MAC mids.
Old 03-17-2004, 01:15 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
16nrollininaws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Land of rocks and boredom
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like they said, with LT's you will get a little more torque and a SLIGHT hp increase over the Macs. They both rock though, just stay as far away from shorties as you can for the LS1. They will gain nearly nothing on 00-02 cars, and slightly on an 98-99. Look for the best deal!
Old 03-17-2004, 07:52 AM
  #12  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

how could you not find what your looking for theres been several huge mac vs lt threads. look in my exhaust guide and you'll see the mac vs lt dyno i pulled from one of those threads.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.