-TheBandit-
03-18-2012, 12:25 AM
I'm putting a high lift cam in my LY6 and I'm debating which method to use for checking piston-valve clearance.
Method 1 (clay): remove the head, put modeling clay on the piston top, reassemble heads & valvetrain, turn the engine over 2rev min, disassemble, slice the clay and measure
Method 2 (indicator): install checker valve springs, reassemble valvetrain, place an indicator on the valve retainer, move piston to pre-TDC during valve overlap events, rotate crank in 2 deg increments, press on each valve until it contacts piston measuring clearance at each crank angle until minimum clearance is found
I'd like to use method 2 because it doesn't require R&Ring the heads or new head bolts and gaskets. Is there any reason to prefer one method over the other?
*EDIT* Here's a pretty decent overview showing both methods. They start with the clay method then show the indicator method. I can see the indicator wouldn't necessarily get you radial clearance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifoGVT4G0m0
Method 1 (clay): remove the head, put modeling clay on the piston top, reassemble heads & valvetrain, turn the engine over 2rev min, disassemble, slice the clay and measure
Method 2 (indicator): install checker valve springs, reassemble valvetrain, place an indicator on the valve retainer, move piston to pre-TDC during valve overlap events, rotate crank in 2 deg increments, press on each valve until it contacts piston measuring clearance at each crank angle until minimum clearance is found
I'd like to use method 2 because it doesn't require R&Ring the heads or new head bolts and gaskets. Is there any reason to prefer one method over the other?
*EDIT* Here's a pretty decent overview showing both methods. They start with the clay method then show the indicator method. I can see the indicator wouldn't necessarily get you radial clearance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifoGVT4G0m0