Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Pros and Cons to 2 bar vs. 3 bar map??

Old 04-06-2012, 07:33 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ranedoss27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Pros and Cons to 2 bar vs. 3 bar map??

Which map sensor is best to go with when switching over to speed density? Its on a stock bottom 2002 z28 with a cam and d1sc.
Thanks
Old 04-06-2012, 07:39 AM
  #2  
tc3
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
tc3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Longwood
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2 bar is only up to 1 times atmospheric pressure soo ends up being like 14.7 psi of boost.... if your going over that. U should have a 3 bar. If your not planning on going that high then a 2 bar will give better accuracy....

Pulling this off top of my head soo someone please correct me if im wrong
Old 04-06-2012, 09:37 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Sweet_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ This guy is correct.
Old 04-06-2012, 09:45 AM
  #4  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

2 bar can be more precise than the 3 bar for tuning. If it's under 15lbs I'd go 2 bar.

You only have 0-5 volts to tune in with. 2 bar cuts in in 1/2, 3 bar cut's it to a 1/3 on drivability table's.
Old 04-06-2012, 09:53 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Shawnee KS
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

2 bar map plugs into stock location/harness. 3 bar usually requires the older style design and different weather pack connector.

2 bar can be used in applications where you run more than 15lbs of boost, but that is up to your tuner.

In my experience I have not noticed a difference in resolution issues when the 3 bar map is mounted correctly vs the factory style 2 bar.
Old 04-06-2012, 10:34 AM
  #6  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I always recommend just starting out and tuning it 3bar so you don't have to do it over in the future. Everyone says they'll never run over 15lbs of boost.....until they do

2 bar is 15 to 210kpa 5kpa per cell. 400-8000rpm, 400rpm per cell

3 bar is 15 to 315kpa, 5kpa per cell between 15 and 105kpa, 10kpa per cell between 110 and 315kpa. 400-8000rpm, 400rpm per cell.

3bar is more resolution than you will ever need. I don't recall ever tuning one and saying "I wish I had another row that split this one by 5kpa".
The following users liked this post:
JoeRJr (06-27-2019)
Old 04-06-2012, 10:45 AM
  #7  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,722
Received 283 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

It also comes down to the fact that any of the 3 bar map sensors out there are definitely less accurate than the 2 and 2.5 bar map sensors which I suppose is just inherent in the design of a sensor with a given range. Some of the calibrations also do penalize you by having a smaller truncated 3 bar VE table (20 kpa breakpoints in boost regions and missing the 20 kpa row all together) compared to the 2 bar like the 04 GTOs and some 03+ calibrations but on an 02-fbody you won't have that issue.

My preference is to use the newer 2.5 bar map sensor out there since it's accurate as hell and run a 3 bar OS.
Old 04-06-2012, 11:03 AM
  #8  
FormerVendor
 
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NicD
It also comes down to the fact that any of the 3 bar map sensors out there are definitely less accurate than the 2 and 2.5 bar map sensors
Even if by a tiny percentage, certainly not enough to ever effect the driveability or performance of the car. I could try and set something up to read a 2bar and 3bar sensor simultaneously but I believe accuracy and stability should be nearly identical.

If you can tune a 3bar SD car to have perfect fuel trims in every cell up to 105kpa and then perfect air/fuel ratio at every boost level above that, I see no reasoning to back up any resolution argument.

JMO
Old 04-06-2012, 01:01 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
ranedoss27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so it seems like the biggest factor is how much boost you run and since i dont plan on going above 15lbs any time soon i should just go with a 2 bar since its also easier to install. does anyone have a part # for a 2 bar that plugs right in?
Old 04-06-2012, 04:13 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
Wicked69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think this was my 2 bar map. BWD EC1678
Old 04-06-2012, 04:38 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
Orange99Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western MD
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ranedoss27
does anyone have a part # for a 2 bar that plugs right in?
I ordered one for a Cobalt SS. It fit in the intake & plugged right in. I don't remember the part# but I found it on here when I was looking.
Old 04-06-2012, 05:18 PM
  #12  
gpr
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

What about a 2.5 bar map sensor, is there one that will replace the factory one? then you'd have best of both worlds, plugs in but gives you a little more boost potential.
Old 04-07-2012, 03:47 PM
  #13  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Good info. i never thought I'd go above 15psi, but saw 200kpa a couple times at 6900rpm with my procharger, well, until #7 ringland let go on the stock bottom end. Now that I am going forged, I'm thinking, hey, what's a couple more pounds of boost lol.

Chances are I'll drive it at this level for a while, but a 2.5 bar sensor does sound tempting as another 7psi of boost would put me at 21 or 22 psi of boost.

I didn't realize that the 3 bar map sensor had normal resolution in vacum, that would make normal drivability just as good as it is now.
Old 04-07-2012, 04:34 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
BigRich954RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2.5 bar sensor its what im running like it plus 21 psi is getting up there. most people will push to 18-19 psi
Old 04-07-2012, 09:46 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
I8UR4RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bama
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
Good info. i never thought I'd go above 15psi, but saw 200kpa a couple times at 6900rpm with my procharger, well, until #7 ringland let go on the stock bottom end. Now that I am going forged, I'm thinking, hey, what's a couple more pounds of boost lol.

Chances are I'll drive it at this level for a while, but a 2.5 bar sensor does sound tempting as another 7psi of boost would put me at 21 or 22 psi of boost.

I didn't realize that the 3 bar map sensor had normal resolution in vacum, that would make normal drivability just as good as it is now.

so hows that build comin anyways?
Old 04-08-2012, 07:48 AM
  #16  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (91)
 
MUSTANGBRKR02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,599
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I thought there was a 3bar MAP that plugged right in now? Off of a Duramax or something.
Old 04-08-2012, 07:59 AM
  #17  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by I8UR4RD
so hows that build comin anyways?
It's coming along nicely. The block is prepped just waiting on the keyway to be cut into the crank then it's assembly time.

I'm hoping to get the motor back in the car by May.
Old 04-08-2012, 09:08 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
FAST LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Athens TN
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MUSTANGBRKR02
I thought there was a 3bar MAP that plugged right in now? Off of a Duramax or something.
This was my impression as well. I need to buy one if anyone knows the part number?
Old 04-08-2012, 11:23 AM
  #19  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
020NN20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The duramax sensor is actually a 3.3 bar sensor, it plugs right in and is the stock style, and I would like to know if people are running these as well as I plan on going into higher boost this year and already have a duramax sensor waiting to go in!! The duramax sensor part number is 28074366. That is the delphi number on the sensor.

Dennis
Old 04-08-2012, 04:37 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (119)
 
PRAY HRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CISSNA PARK, IL
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

subscribing. INTMD8....hey Jim, any thought on the 3.3 bar duramax plug and play vs the 3 bar?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Pros and Cons to 2 bar vs. 3 bar map??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.