Dynamometer Results & Comparisons - Is there a big difference between a Dynojet 424XLC2 and a Mustang 1100SE Dyno?
04-17-2012, 09:31 AM
My 1st dyno tune was on a Mustang 1100SE dyno but this dyno is not around anymore in my area. So the nearest dyno shop to me has a Dynojet 424XLC2. Is there going to be a significant difference between the two?
I plan on going speed density and was thinking about getting a baseline dyno with the MAF before tuning for SD to see if I've made any improvements with the switch.
04-17-2012, 12:57 PM
you will see a major gain on the dynojet I belive a mustang is a loaded dyno and ususally makes numbers 12-15 percent less
04-17-2012, 06:15 PM
Some mustang dynos read higher or lower than dynojets depending on how the shop wants to manipulate the results.
04-17-2012, 06:42 PM
Mustang dynes can read 15-18% less the dynojets! My SS put out 392 RWHP on a very low reading Mustang dyno (-18%), on a Dynojet it pulled 465 RWHP. I'd say that's a big difference!
04-19-2012, 01:50 AM
PS XLC means the dyno jet has an eddy current
04-21-2012, 07:35 AM
^^^^^^^Im with this guy ^^^^^^^^ xlc means eddy current
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO