Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno Gains from 219/223 607/610 114+1 Cam - RESULTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2012, 12:03 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno Gains from 219/223 607/610 114+1 Cam - RESULTS

Hi all, first time poster here. I'm active in another online forum but figured this crowd would be interested in my results as well. Last week I had a cam package installed for my 2004 Z06. Here are the details:

- 219/223 .607/.610 114+1 cam (Comp's LSL lobe)
- Patriot Gold dual valve spring kit
- Comp's rocker arm trunion bearing upgrade kit
- C5R timing chain
- pinned crank
- inspected/shimmed stock oil pump

My previous mods include:
- Callaway CAI
- ported TB
- LG Street headers w/cats

And this is all on a LS6, so it's got the 243 heads and a stock cam of 204/218 .551/.547 117.5-2.5

This chart shows the torque curve comparison, pre- and post-cam. Peak torque went up by 13 ft-lbs, but I gained 19 ft-lbs at 3100 rpm, and 90% of peak torque is already reached by 2500 rpm. Notice I gained torque over the entire rpm range, which is exactly what I was going for. Although this chart only goes down to around 2400 rpm, based on feel I'm confident saying that gains continue all the way down to idle, so this is a perfect cam for a daily driver (which mine is).




This chart shows a detailed view of the torque and power gains. The average torque gain from 2400 - 6600 rpm is 15 ft-lbs, and the average power gain from 4600 - 6600 rpm (which represents the range for redline shifting) is 16 hp. And you can see there are significant torque gains below 3500 rpm.




And this is the final result with the cam. It makes 418 peak horsepower, which is an increase of 20 hp over the previous setup.




At idle, this setup has just a little more lope and shake than a stock LS6. I consider it a semi-sleeper cam, because it likely won't be detected by people other than those who are familiar with the LS engines. It also has greater valvetrain noise than stock, which is to be expected with the dual valve springs and .600"+ lift cam. Lastly, it should have no problems passing CA smog, which is pretty important to me.

Thanks to RPM Motors in Santa Clarita for the installation and tuning.
Old 06-12-2012, 12:05 AM
  #2  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My stock LS6 fuel injectors are around 80% duty cycle with this setup, so I'll be upgrading them when I eventually do some head work.
Old 06-12-2012, 12:58 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Healthy street setup, congrats. Port your stock heads (look at AI or TEA), keep your lightweight valves, switch to PAC 1518 or PSI singles and you will wow at the results.
Old 06-12-2012, 01:32 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Good numbers, but why only +1 advance?

Okay I see now,... so you could keep your power band as close as possible to the factory LS6 cam.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; 06-12-2012 at 01:44 AM.
Old 06-12-2012, 08:58 AM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Seems kinda weak gains, even for a baby cam.

Was this the same dyno as the baseline? Was it tuned?
Old 06-12-2012, 09:35 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
 
SupahRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice looking powerband! I'm sure the car feels much faster then the actual gains you picked up with the cam, which seems to be what you were going for. As Predator said, port the heads sometime in the future and I bet it'll put an even larger permagrin on your face!
Old 06-12-2012, 10:32 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks all for the comments.

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Port your stock heads (look at AI or TEA), keep your lightweight valves, switch to PAC 1518 or PSI singles and you will wow at the results.
With a high lift cam like this, I prefer the security of dualies over the lighter valvetrain of the beehives. I'm still debating what to do with the heads. Both of those porters are already on my radar, but I might just get aftermarket 205 or 210 castings, and sell my 243's to offset the cost.

Originally Posted by redtan
Seems kinda weak gains, even for a baby cam.

Was this the same dyno as the baseline? Was it tuned?
Same dyno, same tuner, both SAE corrected. What gains would you have expected in moving from 204/218 .551/.547 to 219/223 .607/.610?
Old 06-12-2012, 11:09 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
karpetcm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glendale
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

End result is that your happy, you gained power everywhere and the car runs as it should. 418 rwhp and 395 rwtq is awesome and wish i could get that one day.
Old 06-12-2012, 12:42 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
loudblack97z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Smyrna Beach
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

NICE TORQUE! This cam is almost identical to the one going in my LS1, I'm glad to see the torque gains across the board. Thats exactly what I'm going for. I bet the gains at the track will outshine the gains on the dyno.
Old 06-12-2012, 12:56 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Same dyno, same tuner, both SAE corrected. What gains would you have expected in moving from 204/218 .551/.547 to 219/223 .607/.610?
Idk, more than 20hp up top/19tq down low...

Doesn't matter what the dyno says I guess, as long as you're happy. I know I would'nt have been when dropping $1500+ for 20hp and 19tq.
Old 06-12-2012, 01:12 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
Nicul15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Idk, more than 20hp up top/19tq down low...

Doesn't matter what the dyno says I guess, as long as you're happy. I know I would'nt have been when dropping $1500+ for 20hp and 19tq.
its not just 20hp/20tq

if you look at the Average HP increase from 3200-red, that is the money maker. also its over LS6 cam not a LS1 cam.
Old 06-12-2012, 01:32 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
 
bwkmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow thats prob a really fun car now (not like it wasnt before). i think for just a cam that is great. a nice broad torque curve is the best kind of car. when you go real big and it just makes power up top its not as fun to drive in the street. nice cam choice
Old 06-12-2012, 01:52 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Felix C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 627
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nicul15
its not just 20hp/20tq

if you look at the Average HP increase from 3200-red, that is the money maker. also its over LS6 cam not a LS1 cam.
I agree with Redtan.

It made more torque due to the change in overlap but it is primarily at the lower end at 2000/2500 to 3000 and then begins to decline in terms of large gains. Then gains are small until about 6200rpm to 6500rpm. Not really much of a power band increase. I am fairly sure folks have done similar with a more moderate lift and less duration.

Unless OP has other plans as he wrote further one and this is a work in progress. Well my opinion.

Last edited by Felix C; 06-12-2012 at 02:34 PM.
Old 06-12-2012, 02:32 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
badazz81z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Seems kinda weak gains, even for a baby cam.

Was this the same dyno as the baseline? Was it tuned?
I was thinking the #s were high....418hp to the wheels with a small cam and stock heads?

I read on here the stock Z06 rings out about 350-365rwhp stock.

Was this engine or chassis dyno?
Old 06-12-2012, 02:39 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix C
I am fairly sure folks have done similar with a more moderate lift and less duration.
Doubtful. If there's a cam out there with less lift and less duration that produces these gains on a 02-04 LS6 with stock heads and intake manifold, I'd love to hear about it.

Not many people go this small on a LS6 (or even an LS1 for that matter). I went small because I wanted good street manners, a broad torque curve, crisp throttle response, and the ability to pass the CA smog sniffer test.
Old 06-12-2012, 02:42 PM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
I read on here the stock Z06 rings out about 350-365rwhp stock.
Yeah, that's right.

Originally Posted by badazz81z28
Was this engine or chassis dyno?
chassis
Old 06-12-2012, 02:45 PM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks again everyone for the comments. My motivation for posting was simply to spread information to others who are contemplating a cam. But, obviously I knew I'd be getting lots of opinions as well...
Old 06-12-2012, 02:52 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Gunslinger09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice!

It does everything you want and I bet it will run like a scalded dog.
Old 06-12-2012, 02:54 PM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
skyavonee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's also worth noting that stock 243's reach peak flow in the vicinity of .550" lift and gradually fall off from there. So, I'm expecting some head work to really wake this engine up.

Last edited by skyavonee; 06-13-2012 at 12:28 AM.
Old 06-12-2012, 03:21 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Felix C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 627
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skyavonee
Doubtful. If there's a cam out there with less lift and less duration that produces these gains on a 02-04 LS6 with stock heads and intake manifold, I'd love to hear about it.

Not many people go this small on a LS6 (or even an LS1 for that matter). I went small because I wanted good street manners, a broad torque curve, crisp throttle response, and the ability to pass the CA smog sniffer test.
It has been done. However, dynos can be generous or short reading depending on the operator.


Quick Reply: Dyno Gains from 219/223 607/610 114+1 Cam - RESULTS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.