Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2012 CLS550 vs Charger SRT8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2012, 06:25 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2012 CLS550 vs Charger SRT8

Coming home last night I notice a all matte white 2012 CLS550 behind me coming up fast. So I turn ESP off and wait for him to get even with me he was with a smoking hot chick LOL. Well not surprised he pulls past me and im at his rear bumper so were not even at this point and right when I try to pull up to get an even run he guns it. I got on it about 1 second after him this was from an 80 roll and to my surprise he held me off by about half a car to about 140+. We were glued I wasn't gaining any ground and he wasn't pulling. I know alot about the Mercedes Cars but I went home and googled it and what I found was the 2012 Has a twin turbo 5.5L V8 and it weighs in at about 4200lbs. So no wonder that thing was pulling like crazy up top. The SRT8 has alot of top end but I couldnt gain on him at all. From an even start and a slower roll Im positive I could have held him off by about half a car. Those damn things are impressive to not even be an AMG!!

Cliffs:
Tune, Catback, CAI, Mach 1 Killer, Charger SRT8 got held off by a 2012 CLS550 that got a half a car head start.

This is what it looked like


Old 07-01-2012, 07:26 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
gregsss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ada, Ok
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sweet
Old 07-01-2012, 07:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Definitely feels nice to run next to some high-end cars
Old 07-01-2012, 07:55 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I'll just sit by and wait for all the mach1 guys to come on here and say how slow your car is.
Old 07-01-2012, 07:57 PM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Mach 1 would've easily blew right around you two guys.
Old 07-01-2012, 07:58 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
2SSARME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: I'm a Moderator
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I vote to rename site mach1dominance.com
Old 07-01-2012, 08:21 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Coming home last night I notice a all matte white 2012 CLS550 behind me coming up fast. So I turn ESP off and wait for him to get even with me he was with a smoking hot chick LOL. Well not surprised he pulls past me and im at his rear bumper so were not even at this point and right when I try to pull up to get an even run he guns it. I got on it about 1 second after him this was from an 80 roll and to my surprise he held me off by about half a car to about 140+. We were glued I wasn't gaining any ground and he wasn't pulling. I know alot about the Mercedes Cars but I went home and googled it and what I found was the 2012 Has a twin turbo 5.5L V8 and it weighs in at about 4200lbs. So no wonder that thing was pulling like crazy up top. The SRT8 has alot of top end but I couldnt gain on him at all. From an even start and a slower roll Im positive I could have held him off by about half a car. Those damn things are impressive to not even be an AMG!!

Cliffs:
Tune, Catback, CAI, Mach 1 Killer, Charger SRT8 got held off by a 2012 CLS550 that got a half a car head start.

This is what it looked like


4.6L twin turbo 402 hp ? Says car runs a 12.8 and it pulled away from you like crazy?
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...le-performance

Last edited by Theblacknightls1; 07-01-2012 at 08:31 PM.
Old 07-01-2012, 08:28 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You lied to us!

And I don't get why you guys hate on Mach 1's. It is clearly a superior car
Old 07-01-2012, 08:40 PM
  #9  
Teching In
 
Mach Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
4.6L twin turbo 402 hp ? Says car runs a 12.8 and it pulled away from you like crazy?
http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...le-performance
So he either raced the 4.6L 402HP CLS550
or
the 5.5L 518HP CLS63 AMG

Congrats to Mercedes making a twin turbo V8 that produces 402 HP. That's getting up there...
Old 07-01-2012, 08:44 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mach Boy
So he either raced the 4.6L 402HP CLS550
or
the 5.5L 518HP CLS63 AMG

Congrats to Mercedes making a twin turbo V8 that produces 402 HP. That's getting up there...
My neighbors dealer has one in stock the turbos aren't meant for performance, for fuel economy. If mercedes wanted to produce power im sure they know how to.


Old 07-01-2012, 08:53 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Mach Boy
So he either raced the 4.6L 402HP CLS550
or
the 5.5L 518HP CLS63 AMG

Congrats to Mercedes making a twin turbo V8 that produces 402 HP. That's getting up there...
Well he said it wasn't a AMG and it was a cls550
Old 07-01-2012, 08:55 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I can't believe that car held you like that. I have ran a few and it wasn't even a race. Granted they weren't 12' models which raised the HP by 20 over the non-AMG models I ran. But even the 12's the are a low 13 sec car so you should have been able to take it out. I did however run a CLS 63 AMG that was relatively close but I still slowly walked away.
Old 07-01-2012, 08:58 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
I can't believe that car held you like that. I have ran a few and it wasn't even a race. Granted they weren't 12' models which raised the HP by 20 over the non-AMG models I ran. But even the 12's the are a low 13 sec car so you should have been able to take it out. I did however run a CLS 63 AMG that was relatively close but I still slowly walked away.
12.0@121 and you walked it? Sorry I call bs http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/up...benz-cls63-amg
Old 07-01-2012, 09:04 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
Mach Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adamantium
My neighbors dealer has one in stock the turbos aren't meant for performance, for fuel economy. If mercedes wanted to produce power im sure they know how to.
Even so 24mpg isn't all that stunning. The Camaro and Mustang are rated with more horses and the same/better MPG rating. Without the use of turbos.
Old 07-01-2012, 09:14 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
12.0@121 and you walked it? Sorry I call bs http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/up...benz-cls63-amg
IDK what's so hard to believe. I make more power and have less weight. This was from a roll and it WAS NOT a 2012. It was the previous model. Even at the 12's new 550 hp it is still close to my power but I still weigh less.

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 4-door sedan

PRICE AS TESTED: $100,805 (base price: $95,575)

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208cc
Power (SAE net): 507 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 112.4 in Length: 194.0 in Width: 73.7 in Height: 54.7 in
Curb weight: 4366 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.8 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 23.5 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph: 4.4 sec
Standing ,¼-mile: 12.6 sec @ 114 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 158 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 163 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.87 g
Old 07-01-2012, 09:20 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
IDK what's so hard to believe. I make more power and have less weight. This was from a roll and it WAS NOT a 2012. It was the previous model. Even at the 12's new 550 hp it is still close to my power but I still weigh less.

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 4-door sedan

PRICE AS TESTED: $100,805 (base price: $95,575)

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208cc
Power (SAE net): 507 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 112.4 in Length: 194.0 in Width: 73.7 in Height: 54.7 in
Curb weight: 4366 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.8 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 23.5 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph: 4.4 sec
Standing ,¼-mile: 12.6 sec @ 114 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 158 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 163 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.87 g
Ok you didn't say it wasn't a 12 and we was talking about the 12 you just said you ran a AMG version. If it was a 12 trapping 121-122 I don't see you walking it.. What do you trap in the 1/4?
Old 07-01-2012, 09:27 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
Ok you didn't say it wasn't a 12 and we was talking about the 12 you just said you ran a AMG version. If it was a 12 trapping 121-122 I don't see you walking it.. What do you trap in the 1/4?
I haven't been able to beat by best time which was when I was stock. Now I just spiiiinnnn. Two weeks ago at the track, I literally spun my tires to the threads and had to replace them. My best stock time was 12.85@108.39 with a DA of +1872. Keep in mind that the engine in my car is a crate engine.
Old 07-01-2012, 09:30 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Theblacknightls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Antonio ,TX
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
I haven't been able to beat by best time which was when I was stock. Now I just spiiiinnnn. Two weeks ago at the track, I literally spun my tires to the threads and had to replace them. My best stock time was 12.85@108.39 with a DA of +1872.
The car you posted traps 114 so I'm assuming you trap faster than 114 to have walked it thats why I'm asking
Old 07-01-2012, 09:46 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Theblacknightls1
The car you posted traps 114 so I'm assuming you trap faster than 114 to have walked it thats why I'm asking
I know what they run and I really thought I was about to get embarrassed but that is not what happened. The Merc driver was a good sport about it though and we did talk afterwards. My car is most definitely capable of doing better than what I am able to get out of it since the engine was replaced. I just can't find the proper way to launch. I've all but given up trying to figure out how to launch it. Nothing I do seems to work. I have to get some wider, stickier tires if I want to get traction but at the same time I don't want to spend the $$ on something that I do maybe a couple times a year. I forgot to mention the crate engine before you replied.
Old 07-01-2012, 10:52 PM
  #20  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
adamantium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: From the abyss
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mach Boy
Even so 24mpg isn't all that stunning. The Camaro and Mustang are rated with more horses and the same/better MPG rating. Without the use of turbos.
25mpg on the highway and 17 in the city for a 4k+lb auto car is AWESOME.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/31572.shtml


My car gets 15 in the city and it weighs almost 1000lbs less and its an M6.

Why you're comparing your mustang to a Mercedes is beyond me.


Quick Reply: 2012 CLS550 vs Charger SRT8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.