Generation IV External Engine - Ported (or stock) L92 Truck Intake VS FAST LsXRT 102

Trying to find some flow numbers or dyno results between these two and can't seem to come up with much..

I've seen a lot of the LS3 or the Fast (car intake) vs the OEM L92 intake but haven't been able to find any comparisons between the OEM truck intake (preferably ported) vs the Fast LsXRT 102's

http://www.cpgnation.com/filehost/files/2/New%20Products/146602%20(640).jpg
http://vericom.biz/intake.jpg

http://www.performancetrucks.net/forums/gm-engine-exhaust-performance-21/thread-i-found-fast-ls3-intake-vs-ported-l92-truck-intake-477109/

Fast LS3 vs Ported L92



Still cant find truck vs truck

The truck intake is the better of the two 102mm fast intakes, if it will fit your setup.

Yeah, im asking between the two TRUCK intakes, im not going to run a car intake but those are the only comparisons I can find.. im trying to find one between the TRUCK 102 FAST.. and a ported OEM TRUCK intake

there is not a fast 102 for l92/ls3 heads. I will be running an ls2 portworks ported l92 intake with my ls3 heads. As is, a truck l92 intake outflows an ls3 intake so better if ported. Fyi.

there is not a fast 102 for l92/ls3 heads.


Yes there is, just not a large truck sized one.