Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Engine Build for 69 Camaro and New to LS World

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2012, 03:53 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
69z28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Engine Build for 69 Camaro and New to LS World

I have a 69 Camaro that I want to start building an engine for (Camaro has 4 speed muncie that I would still use and has 4.10s in the rear end). Right now I'm just in the saving/planning/researching stages. I am new to the LS engines but i like the idea of large cubes and light weight. My goal with the engine is to have around 600 hp and same torque. The Camaro is just a street car that I would maybe do road racing/drifting later down the road. My initial idea was to do an LS7 because I like the sound of a 427 but then I found out that was way too expensive for me to do. Then I started looking into LS3 builds to make a 427 but having to re-sleeve the cylinders is looking to be a little bit more than I am wanting to spend. I have also started looking into the LQ9's as an option but right now I don't know enough about them. So my question is what is the best LS engine setup for me to achieve around 600hp and torque while staying under $5000 roughly for the entire build. My dad has built a few engines before and I am good at wrenching so I would be assembling the engine and doing all the work I can to save money. I would love to hear everyone's input for my options.
Old 07-08-2012, 04:15 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You will need more money for 600hp. You could get 500 for 5k if you watch your dollars. Also 600 ftlbs is a lot of torque without boost. It is your money but I would suggest getting someone involved in your project that knows what they are doing. Good luck.
Old 07-08-2012, 04:36 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default Give TSP a call

LQ9 408 stroker or LS3 417 stroker will get you to your HP goals with the propper heads/cam/mani/TB. but not TQ.
$3700 will get you into a budget LQ9 408 stroker. http://www.texas-speed.com/p-588-tsp...ort-block.aspx
$5K will get alittle more than a shortblock (LS3417) http://www.texas-speed.com/p-295-tsp...ort-block.aspx
Old 07-08-2012, 05:26 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

AES has a good deal on Lq4/9 427's buy you'll need an awesome set of heads, Cam and intake but that's for 540/550 hp. But you'll need more money for those goals if u ask me.
Old 07-08-2012, 07:15 PM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

To make that power with that budget, you are going to need nitrous.
Old 07-08-2012, 10:24 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
69z28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I appreciate all of the feedback. I am mainly trying to keep the cost as low as I can while achieving the 600 mark. Now that I think about it more $7000 would be my absolute max. I want to stay naturally aspirated since I like raw power.

What are the pros/cons between the LQ9 408 and LS3 418 aside from just the weight? If they achieve the same amount of power then I would go with the LQ9 to save money.
Old 07-08-2012, 10:44 PM
  #7  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,311
Received 3,360 Likes on 2,078 Posts

Default

If auto crossing, or road racing is in your future, then you'll really appreciate the weight savings out on the nose of the car by going aluminum block. It turns out that it is a good bit more than the 70 to 80 lbs. that was once considered to be the difference. Right at 107 lbs is the actual weight difference. If your simply trying to save money (aren't we all) and not so much worried about the weight difference, then the iron engine is the way to go. Do they achieve the same power goals? Yes sir. It all boils down to application and money.
Old 07-08-2012, 11:59 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
futureuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 69z28camaro
So my question is what is the best LS engine setup for me to achieve around 600hp and torque while staying under $5000 roughly for the entire build.

Even at $7000 for the entire build, I don't think it's realistic to meet your goals, unless you get some of the parts for free or way below market rates. Check out my build. I did the 600hp for cheap. It's the little odds and ends that add up.

Last edited by futureuser; 07-09-2012 at 12:06 AM.
Old 07-09-2012, 12:02 AM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
futureuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
If auto crossing, or road racing is in your future, then you'll really appreciate the weight savings out on the nose of the car by going aluminum block. It turns out that it is a good bit more than the 70 to 80 lbs. that was once considered to be the difference. Right at 107 lbs is the actual weight difference. If your simply trying to save money (aren't we all) and not so much worried about the weight difference, then the iron engine is the way to go. Do they achieve the same power goals? Yes sir. It all boils down to application and money.
Just curious, how did you get this number? I have read 88 pounds.
Old 07-09-2012, 09:33 PM
  #10  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,311
Received 3,360 Likes on 2,078 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by futureuser
Just curious, how did you get this number? I have read 88 pounds.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...ls-blocks.html
It's in the stickys, over at gen 3 internal engine.
Old 07-10-2012, 12:14 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are you planning to run a carb or EFI with the LS? EFI will raise cost of the fuel system, going to a carb removes one of the best features of the LS.

Couple of thoughts from someone who also owns a 69:

1) Your Muncie will not hold 600 hp - look at TKO600 or aftermarket T56 here. Both have OD which will help a lot with 4.10 gears. If your rear is not a 12 bolt, it will also die with sticky tires. Add a drive shaft too.

2) LS will require all new accessory drive, new oil pan and radiator to fit. Make sure these are in your budget. New springs might be needed as well.

3) For a Gen I car, 600 hp is cheaper to get installed using BBC, cast crank 496 coming to mind. (hard to beat cubic inches) Like it or not, LS aftermarket parts are still more expensive than old style SBC or BBC - hopefully some day the difference will be smaller.

4) You can buy an 800 hp 540 for less than the LS7 - Straub has a build it yourself kit including AFR heads for just under $10K.
Old 07-10-2012, 03:03 PM
  #12  
Launching!
 
6D9 Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree... if you are going to stick to 600 rwhp or less, I would just go with an old school BBC such as a 468-496.

Vortecproperformance.com is a guy that is pretty known on the classic camaro and chevelle sites that has some great package setups. I was looking at the 650-700 fwhp setups for me ($7,500-8,000).

Although now Im thinking that wont be enough, and I think I may go stroked LS3 with a blower (800-900 rwhp).

As stated, that Muncie isnt going to hold very long at the 600 rwhp. Same with the rear unless you have a built 12-bolt/9".
Old 07-10-2012, 05:11 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 6D9 Matt
I agree... if you are going to stick to 600 rwhp or less, I would just go with an old school BBC such as a 468-496.

Vortecproperformance.com is a guy that is pretty known on the classic camaro and chevelle sites that has some great package setups. I was looking at the 650-700 fwhp setups for me ($7,500-8,000).

Although now Im thinking that wont be enough, and I think I may go stroked LS3 with a blower (800-900 rwhp).

As stated, that Muncie isnt going to hold very long at the 600 rwhp. Same with the rear unless you have a built 12-bolt/9".
If you go to a blower, you don't need a stroker to make 800-900 rwhp - stock cubes are more than adequate. You can get same hp with a 540 and a little N20 for less $$. Either option will require significant upgrades to a Gen 1 car to be safe.
Old 07-10-2012, 06:40 PM
  #14  
Launching!
 
6D9 Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Definitely... Im just not a fan of the giggle gas. Im either going blower or turbo.

What kind of upgrades do you consider a good idea around 600-800 rwhp on a first gen? Not trying to hijack the thread, but seems like a relevant question to the OP. Brakes? Steering upgrades? I have some ideas (and done most of them), but want to hear others opinions.
Old 07-10-2012, 08:45 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
COPO9560's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 6D9 Matt
Definitely... Im just not a fan of the giggle gas. Im either going blower or turbo.

What kind of upgrades do you consider a good idea around 600-800 rwhp on a first gen? Not trying to hijack the thread, but seems like a relevant question to the OP. Brakes? Steering upgrades? I have some ideas (and done most of them), but want to hear others opinions.
Ideally a new front subframe with more modern geometry, rack & pinion steering and large disk brakes. Hard to argue with less weight and better performance. This should be coupled with subframe connectors, shaft loop and a cage. My Gen 1 twists with subframe connectors only and you can find cracks in many high powered cars where front posts meet roof. These cars, just like the newer ones, were never set up for this kind of power.

There are a lot of options for new front & rear suspension for these older cars but some can be pricey. Detroit Speed has my favorite stuff but I just don't have the $$ to invest now. Most of the new subframes will work with SBC/BBC or LS stuff.
Old 07-10-2012, 10:06 PM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
69z28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by COPO9560
Are you planning to run a carb or EFI with the LS? EFI will raise cost of the fuel system, going to a carb removes one of the best features of the LS.

Couple of thoughts from someone who also owns a 69:

1) Your Muncie will not hold 600 hp - look at TKO600 or aftermarket T56 here. Both have OD which will help a lot with 4.10 gears. If your rear is not a 12 bolt, it will also die with sticky tires. Add a drive shaft too.

2) LS will require all new accessory drive, new oil pan and radiator to fit. Make sure these are in your budget. New springs might be needed as well.

3) For a Gen I car, 600 hp is cheaper to get installed using BBC, cast crank 496 coming to mind. (hard to beat cubic inches) Like it or not, LS aftermarket parts are still more expensive than old style SBC or BBC - hopefully some day the difference will be smaller.

4) You can buy an 800 hp 540 for less than the LS7 - Straub has a build it yourself kit including AFR heads for just under $10K.
I would stick with the carb since I like the idea of having no computerized controls (I know the MSD box would be the only computerized item for the ignition on the LS engine with a carb).

How much will the muncie hold up to? Mine is not the rock crusher but I'm not quite sure if it's the close ratio or not. My dad used to have a 69 ss camaro with a 427 that he had built up and that had a muncie (not a rock crusher). It held up well with no problems. My dad never really knew what kind of hp he was running in it but it had to be around 500hp I would guess. He had a dana 60 with 4.88's in the rear end.

Mine is a 12 bolt rear end. The drive shaft I'm not sure about. I would probably guess that it is stock.

I knew with an LS I would need new accessory drive and oil pan along with headers but how come the radiator? I just bought a new radiator for it since the old one was leaking pretty bad. It's the same size except that the new one is a 3 core. I also have a 14" electric fan. Would this still work with an LS engine?

You bring up a very good point and that was part of the reason I started this thread. I was under the impression that the LS engines are a great upgrade from the traditional SBC and BBC. The reason I started looking into an LS engine is because of larger cubes and less weight. Right now I have a 327 in the camaro that has been mildly built (when I bought it the owner did not know what all had been done previously to the engine but you can tell it has been built up better than stock) and the suspension has been upgraded and handles like a dream. My fear was that by putting in a BBC I would lose the "dream" like handling. I have seen BBC blocks fairly cheap compared to the LS blocks new. My dad actually still has a 396 block that I could possibly use.

Now I guess my question is what are the main pros/cons between a BBC and an LS engine? Is the weight all that different? For me the weight difference between the LQ9 and LS3 of ~107 lbs is not that big of a deal. Any input about BBC vs LS is much appreciated
Old 07-11-2012, 07:15 PM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
69z28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been continually searching craigslist to see if any good deals pop up on LS engines. Today I found this LQ9 block for $400: http://cleveland.craigslist.org/pts/3052216928.html
Is that a decent price for a LQ9 block?
Old 07-12-2012, 03:25 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
69SS396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by COPO9560
Are you planning to run a carb or EFI with the LS? EFI will raise cost of the fuel system, going to a carb removes one of the best features of the LS.

Couple of thoughts from someone who also owns a 69:

1) Your Muncie will not hold 600 hp - look at TKO600 or aftermarket T56 here. Both have OD which will help a lot with 4.10 gears. If your rear is not a 12 bolt, it will also die with sticky tires. Add a drive shaft too.
Stay away from the vibration prone and long throw shifting TKO600 and get a used T56.
Old 07-12-2012, 04:07 PM
  #19  
Launching!
 
6D9 Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agreed! I swapped in a T56 magnum for my Camaro. Absolutely love it...
Old 07-15-2012, 05:10 PM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
69z28camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well my uncle owns a body shop and my cousin works there and I was talking to him about ls engines. He said they could get me a LQ9 with all accessories out of a salvage yard with under 80k mi on it for around $1000. I was wondering how are the LQ9 blocks for what I'm looking to do with it?


Quick Reply: Engine Build for 69 Camaro and New to LS World



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.