Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Why so much timing with my Blown LS3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2012, 07:35 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
se7en82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why so much timing with my Blown LS3?

Alright ive asked this question to so many people lately and still cant get a good answer. I have an LS3 with a Maggie on top that is taking 28* of timing running URT. What makes the engine take this much timing and only make 650rwhp? I have a 9.5:1 CR and the cam numbers are (215/247 .629/.656 121 CL

Any help understanding this would be appreciated
Old 08-04-2012, 07:51 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

RWHP is respectable. However, with that much exhaust duration combined with a 121° LSA, your dynamic compression ratio is prolly in the 7's. With a DCR that low, it'll take more timing, not to mention you're leaving a lot on the table.
Old 08-05-2012, 01:01 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
CAMSTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Miami gardens FL 33055
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats about rite, i used 27 degrees @ 20psi on pump gas running straight methanol injection, made 880 whp and 941 rwt on my previous build with pro charger d1sc 9" bottom pulley and 4" top, with a 402 stroker using the same compresion
Old 08-05-2012, 09:02 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
se7en82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just seems high to me and im trying not to tear it up. I guess i could start looking at the end of the plugs after each run to try and see exactly whats going on. Im hitting a wall with this engine and power and at this point have an idea on which way to go, but not 100% confident in it. New cam, heads and maybe a 102 TB and i should break out some more power, but im not sure that will give me much more or where i want to be. Also i know heat soak is killing this positive displacement, so thats another thing ive got to tackle in order to keep the power to the ground.
Old 08-05-2012, 04:51 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S10xGN
RWHP is respectable. However, with that much exhaust duration combined with a 121° LSA, your dynamic compression ratio is prolly in the 7's. With a DCR that low, it'll take more timing, not to mention you're leaving a lot on the table.
You do know that exhaust duration nor LSA has anything to do with dynamic compression right?

Intake duration and ICL determine DCR.

28* is IMO way to much for a boosted motor even on race gas especially a power adder like a roots that pretty much super heats the intake air coming into the motor.

I'd be around 18*-20* on race gas with a set-up like that and 12-14* on pump gas.
Old 08-05-2012, 06:09 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
-TheBandit-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Instagram @chevyhotrodder
Posts: 2,813
Received 79 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

The ICL is 121 or was that a typo? Perhaps 112 ICL? What Is the LSA?
Old 08-05-2012, 07:44 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
se7en82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cam Specs are: 215/247 .629/.656 121 CL

IMO its way too much also, but why is it taking so much is what i dont understand. What can be done to lower it without losing power? When its set at 18-21 the car just doesnt make the power
Old 08-05-2012, 08:41 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
You do know that exhaust duration nor LSA has anything to do with dynamic compression right?...
No I didn't, I'll go back and do some more research though. Doesn't make any sense, if you were to leave the exhaust valve off the seat completely, there would zero compression, so it must figure in somehow. Anyway, I see it's not an inputted "spec" in the calculators...
Old 08-05-2012, 09:39 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S10xGN
No I didn't, I'll go back and do some more research though. Doesn't make any sense, if you were to leave the exhaust valve off the seat completely, there would zero compression, so it must figure in somehow. Anyway, I see it's not an inputted "spec" in the calculators...
Wasn't trying to put you down.

But the intake valve close event has everything to do with compression.

The compression stroke happens when the intake valve is closing. When and where that intake valve closes determines how much pressure is captured in the combustion event. Adding intake duration makes the intake valve close later thus reducing DCR and reducing intake duration makes it close earlier thus trapping more cylinder pressure in the cylinder earlier as the piston rises up in the bore on the compression stroke.

When you advance or retard the ICL it advances or retards that IVC event along with all the other valve events.

Exhaust valve open and close happen after the compression stroke therefore not having any effect on compression.

Hope that makes sense.
Old 08-05-2012, 09:41 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-
The ICL is 121 or was that a typo? Perhaps 112 ICL? What Is the LSA?
That is a Lingenfelter cam if I am not mistaken and is the GT9 and has a 121lsa. I do not know what the ICL is on that cam though as they don't list it.
Old 08-05-2012, 09:52 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
se7en82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
That is a Lingenfelter cam if I am not mistaken and is the GT9 and has a 121lsa. I do not know what the ICL is on that cam though as they don't list it.
Yes sir you are correct. I will try and find out what the ICL is on this cam, but do you think having this cam is keeping me from gaining power after adding so much timing?
Old 08-05-2012, 09:58 PM
  #12  
Launching!
 
red 454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CAIRNS QLD AUST
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.lingenfelter.com/mm5/merc...Category_Code=
Old 08-06-2012, 02:58 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
G8-4-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hope Mills, NC
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow, that cam is going to want to push the motor to 7200. 5800-7200 is where it pulls best last time I ran a cam like it in a KB boosted 2010 Camaro. Power is in your blower, Pulley it, cog it, port it, Big MAF, Big TB. The same cam on a 115 LSA +2 would do much better. Methanol injection is always a plus with a roots....
Old 08-09-2012, 07:24 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by se7en82
Yes sir you are correct. I will try and find out what the ICL is on this cam, but do you think having this cam is keeping me from gaining power after adding so much timing?
If the ICL is 121 straight up with the 121 lsa then yes it is KILLING every bit of cylinder pressure that the 215 intake lobe would give you.

I would advance it at least 4 degrees if not closer to 6 degrees.

And yes if it were on a 116+3 I would like the valve events much better.
Old 08-09-2012, 10:06 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

Maybe a different cam is in order.
Old 08-26-2012, 03:39 PM
  #16  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
If the ICL is 121 straight up with the 121 lsa then yes it is KILLING every bit of cylinder pressure that the 215 intake lobe would give you.

I would advance it at least 4 degrees if not closer to 6 degrees.

And yes if it were on a 116+3 I would like the valve events much better.
And what difference do you think that would make ? to overall power, rpm band etc ?

Just interested as I have the GT9 in mine now

I certainly cant throw timing at mine like this guy is doing though.

I'd almost query if the numbers he is quoting are correct, and they should be verified with a timing light.
Old 08-26-2012, 03:48 PM
  #17  
Restricted User
 
willyfastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would deff. ditch that cam. It's probably a big part of your problem. Poor exhaust and poor heads cause higher timing as well.
Old 08-26-2012, 03:54 PM
  #18  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by willyfastz
I would deff. ditch that cam. It's probably a big part of your problem. Poor exhaust and poor heads cause higher timing as well.
I believe this car runs the GT9



I really doubt the camshaft is a problem unless it has not been installed correctly.
Old 08-26-2012, 04:04 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
se7en82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive given the cam specs to multiple engine builders and all say ditch the cam and go for a more specific one for my build instead of an "off the shelf" one. It may not be the exact problem, but it still needs to be changed in my opinion
Old 08-26-2012, 04:08 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

GT9 cam works great. Given the number of profiles available for the LS platform, all profiles can be considered "off the shelf".

But it would take an incredibly bad profile to no produce results in an LS. The GT9 is a good camshaft and has been proven in different engines. I'm certainly very pleased with it in mine.
It idles super smooth, it revs and makes good power.

Maybe try a different tuner, and as said, verify 100% the timing you think you have, you are actually seeing at the plug.


Quick Reply: Why so much timing with my Blown LS3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.