B'klyn9C1
08-14-2012, 11:42 AM
I have a 4200 LBS 1995 Caprice 9C1 into which I want to do a LSx conversion with a 6L80e/6L90e transmission and the performance goals of 525 RWHP/500 RWTQ.
I would like your opinion on what direct direction to go for my LSx conversion.
I was leaning towards a iron block N/A 408 ci LQ based stroker or a N/A 417 ci LS3/L92 based stroker with CNC ported heads and cam. But a Tech at a supercharging shop, said that since I want a high performance street motor and not to compete in any particular racing class and the car is a daily driver. That I should consider a centifugal blower in the low boost range (like 5 to 9.5 psi) on a pull out LSx motor from a junkyard. LS2 (6 Liters)and above to a LS3/L92. This would save money on head porting and give me at least 600 RWHP/600 RWTQ to 700 RWHP/650 RWTQ along with stock street manners and way better driveability and gas mileage than a H&C stroker. Don't have to worry about things like a high stall torque converter, shitty around town gas mileage and numerically highgears. I do want to go back to 3.08 rear gears. Sound I like have your cake and eat it too scenerio. I am starting to see why there so many guys around here that are into Grand Nationals and Regal T-Types
While all this is tempting especiallly the 600 RWHP. I am not too kean on slaping a blower on junk LSx with miles on it and stock rotating assembly. Esp the rods and the pistons. I heard that the stock cast crank is tough stuff and can handle 750 FWHP and not break.
Can you please explain to me the logic and the cost of the blower route as opposed to a N/A Heads & Cam Stroker???
What are the pros and cons of either route??
I heard that the FI route requires a lot of supporting mods that addtional fuel pumps, water/methanol injection, etc etc. Is it worth it.??
Can a N/A 416 ci stroker be as daily driver friendly as a forced induction stock cubed LSx??
Which option has the least hassles in installation and operation??
Your thoughts and comments.
I would like your opinion on what direct direction to go for my LSx conversion.
I was leaning towards a iron block N/A 408 ci LQ based stroker or a N/A 417 ci LS3/L92 based stroker with CNC ported heads and cam. But a Tech at a supercharging shop, said that since I want a high performance street motor and not to compete in any particular racing class and the car is a daily driver. That I should consider a centifugal blower in the low boost range (like 5 to 9.5 psi) on a pull out LSx motor from a junkyard. LS2 (6 Liters)and above to a LS3/L92. This would save money on head porting and give me at least 600 RWHP/600 RWTQ to 700 RWHP/650 RWTQ along with stock street manners and way better driveability and gas mileage than a H&C stroker. Don't have to worry about things like a high stall torque converter, shitty around town gas mileage and numerically highgears. I do want to go back to 3.08 rear gears. Sound I like have your cake and eat it too scenerio. I am starting to see why there so many guys around here that are into Grand Nationals and Regal T-Types
While all this is tempting especiallly the 600 RWHP. I am not too kean on slaping a blower on junk LSx with miles on it and stock rotating assembly. Esp the rods and the pistons. I heard that the stock cast crank is tough stuff and can handle 750 FWHP and not break.
Can you please explain to me the logic and the cost of the blower route as opposed to a N/A Heads & Cam Stroker???
What are the pros and cons of either route??
I heard that the FI route requires a lot of supporting mods that addtional fuel pumps, water/methanol injection, etc etc. Is it worth it.??
Can a N/A 416 ci stroker be as daily driver friendly as a forced induction stock cubed LSx??
Which option has the least hassles in installation and operation??
Your thoughts and comments.