Procharger belt too tight? - is this a bad thing?
#2
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
Is it a static tensioner? If so, as the rpms increase, the belt will stretch which lowers the tension. That's one of the reasons I dislike a static tensioner is because you have to put way too much tension on them at idle in order to maintain enough tension throughout the rpm band. Too much tension can't be good for the blower bearings or the crank bearings either.
#4
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
When do you need more tension, as the rpms increase, and with a static tensioner, that doesn't happen. The belt will stretch with rpms, and the tension on the belt drops, causing slippage, and once slippage starts to happen, you're done because now the belt is heating up and getting a 'glaze' on the the rubber which causes it to slip even more.
Why do you think everyone with a static f-body procharger tensioner ends up going with an active tensioner to get rid of belt slip.
#5
It is not a static tensioner.
It would be the same tensioner used in this video:
This belt is super tight, Im just wondering if this is hard on the head unit bearings. Thing seems loud at idle.
my guess is the tensioner bearings would go before the head unit, if thats even possible...
It would be the same tensioner used in this video:
This belt is super tight, Im just wondering if this is hard on the head unit bearings. Thing seems loud at idle.
my guess is the tensioner bearings would go before the head unit, if thats even possible...
#6
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
I've never had a problem with belt tension causing any problems. I know you don't have a static tensioner, but I've had to run extremely tight belts with static tensioners and have not encountered any problems. Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076
PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com
https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Senoia, GA
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's the opposite? That an adjustable tensioner isn't better than a static tensioner?
When do you need more tension, as the rpms increase, and with a static tensioner, that doesn't happen. The belt will stretch with rpms, and the tension on the belt drops, causing slippage, and once slippage starts to happen, you're done because now the belt is heating up and getting a 'glaze' on the the rubber which causes it to slip even more.
Why do you think everyone with a static f-body procharger tensioner ends up going with an active tensioner to get rid of belt slip.
When do you need more tension, as the rpms increase, and with a static tensioner, that doesn't happen. The belt will stretch with rpms, and the tension on the belt drops, causing slippage, and once slippage starts to happen, you're done because now the belt is heating up and getting a 'glaze' on the the rubber which causes it to slip even more.
Why do you think everyone with a static f-body procharger tensioner ends up going with an active tensioner to get rid of belt slip.