New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

thermostat question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2012, 10:52 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
stherngent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default thermostat question

I bought a 160* thermostat for my 2000 z-28 camaro an the tabs on it stick out to far to fit, what the heck? When i ordered it, it said it was for a 98'-02' f-body, Anyone know whats wrong?
Old 10-11-2012, 11:02 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Go pick one up from autozone if that one doesn't fit. There only like 5 bucks.
Old 10-12-2012, 12:40 AM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

And get a stock temp one.
Old 10-12-2012, 02:05 AM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
stherngent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why a stock one? If that is the case I'll just keep the one thats in it, it is stock an works fine. I thought the whole theory behind it was to keep the car running a lil cooler so it would perform better?
Old 10-12-2012, 05:54 AM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

No reason for it. Your engine is designed to operate at 185-210 ish. That's where it's most efficient and makes the most power. The only reason to have a lower t stat is if your running high compression or something to that nature that causes your car to run above 210 or so. Then the 160 stat becomes useful by opening sooner and controlling the temps before they get too high.
Old 10-12-2012, 09:47 AM
  #6  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
No reason for it. Your engine is designed to operate at 185-210 ish. That's where it's most efficient and makes the most power.


These are not old SBCs with metal intakes that heat soak, nor the need for excessive timing advance to make best possibile power. A 160° t-stat has no place in your average LS1 application, IMO. There are some exceptions, but not many.
Old 10-12-2012, 02:25 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6


These are not old SBCs with metal intakes that heat soak, nor the need for excessive timing advance to make best possibile power. A 160° t-stat has no place in your average LS1 application, IMO. There are some exceptions, but not many.
yup. its in the bullshit mod class. lots of companies know that there are people that buy cars and want to mod them but dont know much at all about them ( not saying you dont know anything lol) so they produce products that advertise HP increases and will make your engine run better when they themselves know theres no real way your going to be able to prove that it works, just that you get the placebo effect that yea may car seems to be running stronger/faster. the SLP smooth bellows is an example of this mod. 60 bucks for a piece of plastic supposedly giving you 5-7 hp. straight bullshit.
Old 10-12-2012, 02:56 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
the SLP smooth bellows is an example of this mod. 60 bucks for a piece of plastic supposedly giving you 5-7 hp. straight bullshit.
I agree.

I think they put the decimal in the wrong place on those numbers. What they *should* have advertised is a gain of 0.5-0.7 horsepower.
Old 10-12-2012, 06:22 PM
  #9  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
stherngent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol thankls guys
Old 10-12-2012, 06:33 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
2002 blue z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm.... according to my tuner I gained about 20 rwhp with the thermostat after it was tuned.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:12 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2002 blue z28
Hmm.... according to my tuner I gained about 20 rwhp with the thermostat after it was tuned.
no offense to your tuner but i highly doubt that. 20 rwhp form a $5 thermostat? we'd of known about that by now and would be the most popular mod.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:23 PM
  #12  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

What's wrong is, you didn't take anybody's advice to
just forget about a thermostat when any cooling issue
you might have, lies elsewhere.

Send it back before you get it wet, and work on
whatever the real problem is.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:44 PM
  #13  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2002 blue z28
Hmm.... according to my tuner I gained about 20 rwhp with the thermostat after it was tuned.
Your gains came from the tune, not the t-stat.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:46 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
2002 blue z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usnfenix
no offense to your tuner but i highly doubt that. 20 rwhp form a $5 thermostat? we'd of known about that by now and would be the most popular mod.
I'm not saying he's right. He told me these motors make all their power in the timing, and with a 160* stat it would get more timing in. Or something like that. I was pulling 325 rwhp with all my mods excluding the stat. 344 with it.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:47 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
2002 blue z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Your gains came from the tune, not the t-stat.
Ya, that's what I was trying to get at.
Old 10-12-2012, 11:42 PM
  #16  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2002 blue z28
I'm not saying he's right. He told me these motors make all their power in the timing
I think he is confusing LS1s with Gen 1 SBCs. LS1 heads are extremely efficient and don't require nearly as much timing as old SBCs to make premium power. 36-38° would be the norm for old SBC heads (non-vortec); LS1 heads wouldn't want/need anywhere near that much timing.
Old 10-13-2012, 06:10 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
usnfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2002 blue z28
I'm not saying he's right. He told me these motors make all their power in the timing, and with a 160* stat it would get more timing in. Or something like that. I was pulling 325 rwhp with all my mods excluding the stat. 344 with it.
i thought you were saying that you were tuned then made 325, then made 344 with only change being a 160 thermo. to which i would have called bull to your tuner lol. he is wrong about the ls1 making its power in the timing however. although i can see how he can assume so.
Old 10-17-2012, 03:31 PM
  #18  
Teching In
 
lsxformie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Ga.
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the same problem. I had to buy a drop in thermostat. On a cool night when my motor is running 160* It seems to pull a little better but that could all be in my head..lol
Old 10-17-2012, 04:21 PM
  #19  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,033
Likes: 0
Received 1,486 Likes on 1,069 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lsxformie
On a cool night.....It seems to pull a little better
That's because the outside air temp is cooler, and therefore the intake air chrage is cooler/more dense, thus more power. It's not because of the coolant temps.



Quick Reply: thermostat question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.