Vengeance Built 2001 Camaro 1LE LS2 402 H/C/I puts down 524hp & 498tq at the tires!
11-08-2012, 04:27 PM
#1
Vengeance Built 2001 Camaro 1LE LS2 402 H/C/I puts down 524hp & 498tq at the tires! The 1LE fourth gen Camaro has amazing suspension upgrades from the factory! HOWEVER, our customer felt that it was still lacking the POWER that it deserved.....and we just couldn't have that! She now boasts nearly 500 ft/lbs of torque and is more fun than ever before! Here's a few details of the engine build-
Engine:
GM LS2 Block
Callies Compstar Crankshaft
Callies Compstar Connecting Rods
Diamond Forged Pistons
Vengeance Racing VRX-5 Camshaft
TFS 215 Cylinder Heads reworked for a 4" bore
FAST 92 Intake
Dual Valve Spring kit
Hardened Pushrods
Melling HV Pump
Comp Trunion Kit
GM LS2 Block
Callies Compstar Crankshaft
Callies Compstar Connecting Rods
Diamond Forged Pistons
Vengeance Racing VRX-5 Camshaft
TFS 215 Cylinder Heads reworked for a 4" bore
FAST 92 Intake
Dual Valve Spring kit
Hardened Pushrods
Melling HV Pump
Comp Trunion Kit
VIDEO:
DYNO GRAPH:
ENGINE BAY:
EXTERIOR:
INTERIOR:
If you have ANY questions, or if you're ready to take your LS car to the next step shoot me a PM or just give us a call!!! (678) 513-7105
Last edited by David@Vengeance; 11-09-2012 at 10:12 AM.
11-09-2012, 06:56 AM
#3
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome power...is it still on the stock 3.42, 10-bolt? Can't imagine that rear lasting long with almost 500 lbs. at the rear tires if it is. Also, are you guys using the stock 75mm MAF? It looks like it in the photos, just curious since you're using a 102 intake and I'm guessing a 102 TB.
Great results and I'm sure the owner is more than pleased...
Great results and I'm sure the owner is more than pleased...
11-09-2012, 10:23 AM
#5
Awesome power...is it still on the stock 3.42, 10-bolt? Can't imagine that rear lasting long with almost 500 lbs. at the rear tires if it is. Also, are you guys using the stock 75mm MAF? It looks like it in the photos, just curious since you're using a 102 intake and I'm guessing a 102 TB.
Great results and I'm sure the owner is more than pleased...
Great results and I'm sure the owner is more than pleased...
stock maf and Comp 850 lifters...much more quiet than the LS7's
11-09-2012, 10:29 AM
#7
This build proves that there isn't a real need to upgrade the maf as the 75mm seems plenty on this motor. Also shows you don't need a 102 fast to make great all motor power, as the graphs shows great low end power and I'm sure it has great throttle response. Those trickflows really just work.
Trending Topics
11-09-2012, 11:32 AM
#11
11-09-2012, 11:53 AM
#12
Btw, Vengeance has told me before they prefer to run the stock MAF and regular lids. Futral said the same thing. Mainly because there is really no power to be had and the drivability is better with the smaller MAF using our ECUs.
So, I think people should look at results like this and reconsider whether or not a big 85 or 100mm MAF is worth it vs stock MAF on a 500rwhp motor. I know I have. It'll save me some bucks on my build too.
So, I think people should look at results like this and reconsider whether or not a big 85 or 100mm MAF is worth it vs stock MAF on a 500rwhp motor. I know I have. It'll save me some bucks on my build too.
11-09-2012, 12:27 PM
#13
Btw, Vengeance has told me before they prefer to run the stock MAF and regular lids. Futral said the same thing. Mainly because there is really no power to be had and the drivability is better with the smaller MAF using our ECUs.
So, I think people should look at results like this and reconsider whether or not a big 85 or 100mm MAF is worth it vs stock MAF on a 500rwhp motor. I know I have. It'll save me some bucks on my build too.
So, I think people should look at results like this and reconsider whether or not a big 85 or 100mm MAF is worth it vs stock MAF on a 500rwhp motor. I know I have. It'll save me some bucks on my build too.
11-10-2012, 07:42 PM
#14
I ran similar #s on my 408 setup but I have LS3 heads, 102/102m full exh and ac. Not sure on cam specs. I wish I didn't go with the 102/102. I also feel its too big. Thing is I was one of the first with the 102/102 in 2009. When I saw it I said I had to have it. I also have a 4" tube from TB to the FT 4"lid with an LS7 MAF...under light throttle the sound I get is so sweet, it has a turboish sound! Pure air being sucked in!
Good to know at least with my CI I'm in the hp ball park.
Good to know at least with my CI I'm in the hp ball park.
11-10-2012, 07:50 PM
#15
EDIT:
This also helped me with my decision. Thanks.
11-12-2012, 05:08 PM
#16
Just got off the phone with the owner, and he has confirmed that he is running Kooks longtubes with an Off-Road Y pipe to the factory muffler system. The owner of the car will be back in a few weeks for a Nitrous tune, and I will update with those numbers ASAP!!
11-12-2012, 05:10 PM
#17
Just got off the phone with the owner, and he has confirmed that he is running Kooks longtubes with an Off-Road Y pipe to the factory muffler system. The owner of the car will be back in a few weeks for a Nitrous tune, and I will update with those numbers ASAP!!
