Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Caught on fire LQ9 *Pictures*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2012, 12:30 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Caught on fire LQ9 *Pictures*

I bought a LQ9 long block with 30k miles out of an 03 Escalade for 400$
The truck was in a garage attached to a house that went up in flames.

No water got in the motor (From fire company), intake manifold and all upper plastic was melted off, heads are fine just dirty, oil pan and lower sensors all fine.

I plan on using ONLY the short block. All covers, sensors, heads, gaskets, oil pan ect.. will be changed.

When i pulled the oil pan off I found this, the cylinders has some melted plastic dripped into them, but it was easily removed. Cylinders are in perfect shape with cross hatching marks.

Am i safe to run this after some cleaning? It looks like the oil just burnt possibly and stained the block.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/55665137@N05/8214705756/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55665137@N05/8213630623/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55665137@N05/8214718464/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/55665137@N05/8214720670/
Old 11-24-2012, 01:17 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (11)
 
snyousef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does it turn over fine? If it turns over fine after cleaning it up it should be usable no problems, I don't see why there would be any issues it's an iron block...
Old 11-24-2012, 01:24 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Turns over with zero issues. It was just super orange and had be second guessing if it needs to be taken apart and tanked.
Old 11-24-2012, 07:43 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
kossuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Market, MD
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jlee29
Turns over with zero issues. It was just super orange and had be second guessing if it needs to be taken apart and tanked.
I would probiably pull it down and at least clean it all up with new bearings and such. Might be fine as is, but who knows. The fact you found stuff down in the bores is what makes me wonder.
Old 11-25-2012, 03:15 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
muayyadf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It looks like it ran on conventional oil for too long.
Old 11-25-2012, 03:53 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

since plastic got to some pistons I would pull them to make sure there isn't plastic in the rings.
Old 11-26-2012, 08:52 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the input guys. I have decided to run it without taking it down. Its cleaned up fairly well with some scrubbing, and cranks smoothly. I have replaced
Arp rod bolts
Lifters
lifter trays
Cam
Front and rear covers
melling oil pump
Timing set
And all other top-end parts.

I only have 400$ into it, so I plan on starting it with some Sea Foam (Or some type of cleaner) to treat the oil and do a oil change after 15-30 min idle, then repeat after driving around 50 miles..
Old 11-26-2012, 09:37 AM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BKsNHRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Neworleans
Posts: 464
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I had a old 350SBC that burned up in a 78 camaro. Pulled it out. Pressure washed it. Slaped a new carb and distributer in it. Changed the intake manifold gaskets.Stuck it in a pickup truck and drove the crap outta it. No issues at all. I wouldent worry about it to much
Old 11-26-2012, 10:39 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
LeanPocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

dude thats badass!!

for 400$ thats a steal!!
Old 11-26-2012, 11:31 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LMAO pressured washed it! That gives me hope, I dont think I have the guts to go that far but im gonna scrub it good with a cleaner.

Im shooting for 12 psi on a single 80mm Garrett turbo, I'll definatly be driving the crap out of it!
Old 11-26-2012, 12:53 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

BKsNHRA
The difference being this had a plastic intake that melted into the engine.

Now I didn't open the pics large to look but if plastic leaked down to the back side of the piston then it is in the rings and needs to be cleaned out. If it stayed on top and hardened before it leaked past the rings then maybe you could throw the dice.
Old 11-26-2012, 01:02 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Damn, it was close, 2 cylinders had plastic starting to drip down the cylinder walls, but not all the way to the pistons. It was mainly in the heads.
Will I know pretty much right away when I start it if there is plastic in the rings? Im assuming it will most likely smoke, lose compression?
Old 11-26-2012, 01:21 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

If it didn't reach the pistons I wouldn't be too worried.

Far as what would happen if it were in the rings I am not sure exactly but can't imagine it being any good.
Old 11-26-2012, 01:27 PM
  #14  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,596
Received 698 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jlee29
Thanks for the input guys. I have decided to run it without taking it down. Its cleaned up fairly well with some scrubbing, and cranks smoothly. I have replaced
Arp rod bolts
Lifters
lifter trays
Cam
Front and rear covers
melling oil pump
Timing set
And all other top-end parts.

I only have 400$ into it, so I plan on starting it with some Sea Foam (Or some type of cleaner) to treat the oil and do a oil change after 15-30 min idle, then repeat after driving around 50 miles..
You changed the rod bolts with ARP w/o pulling it apart and checking the big end size?
Old 11-26-2012, 08:51 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (57)
 
lizeec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 753
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

My thoughts exactly, the engine probably would have been fine to have been just cleaned and new seals and gaskets, but it is now on borrowed time with the ARP rod bolt upgrade if the OP didn't get the big end checked and honed and corresponding correct bearings installed.

The ARP rod bolt upgrade is over hyped the stock rod bolts are just fine for 90% of the engines out there, now if you are planning on FI or spinning the motor to 7500-8000 rpm's consistently then you need the upgrade, albeit done correctly. Someone is laughing all the way to the bank on the amount of LS Series ARP rod bolts being sold, due to paranoid users that heard of a friend of a friends of a friends uncle that had a rod bolt failure. Many other top end parts will fail first on a stock engine that is being revved to 7500-8000, but to each his own.

Last edited by lizeec; 11-26-2012 at 09:02 PM.
Old 11-27-2012, 08:09 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I went with ARP because this motor is for a turbo setup, 600-700 rwhp.
Old 11-27-2012, 08:19 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Where he is going with the question is did you resize? Did you see the thread where someone documented the "no resizing" Katechs really do need resizing the ARPs clearly state you have to resize and hell maybe even balance.

Then there is the what does HP have to do with rodbolts? RPM is what is rough on rodbolts not HP. Rod bolts are under stress when the piston is pulled back down from TDC, hell if anything the boost reduces vacuum and therefore tension on the rodbolts on the intake stroke. Not arguing boost will make a shortblock more rpm tolerant just trying to make a point about what the stresses on rodbolts are.

Last edited by 96capricemgr; 11-27-2012 at 08:40 AM.
Old 11-27-2012, 09:39 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
jlee29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks for the advice. I did not resize them, nor did I resize them on my old motor that I ran up to 7200 rpms and drove 10k+ miles and still runnin. I guess I completely over looked the fact of resizing. Maybe I should just pull it down, clean it, and put new bearings, rings ect.. or I should have just left the rod bolts alone. Well trial and error it is for me....
Old 11-27-2012, 10:53 AM
  #19  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
smws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Where he is going with the question is did you resize? Did you see the thread where someone documented the "no resizing" Katechs really do need resizing the ARPs clearly state you have to resize and hell maybe even balance.

Then there is the what does HP have to do with rodbolts? RPM is what is rough on rodbolts not HP. Rod bolts are under stress when the piston is pulled back down from TDC, hell if anything the boost reduces vacuum and therefore tension on the rodbolts on the intake stroke. Not arguing boost will make a shortblock more rpm tolerant just trying to make a point about what the stresses on rodbolts are.
Originally Posted by jlee29
Thanks for the advice. I did not resize them, nor did I resize them on my old motor that I ran up to 7200 rpms and drove 10k+ miles and still runnin. I guess I completely over looked the fact of resizing. Maybe I should just pull it down, clean it, and put new bearings, rings ect.. or I should have just left the rod bolts alone. Well trial and error it is for me....


OP listen to what they are saying. I've been following a LQ4 Turbo build on another site and what they are saying about getting the rod's re-size after ARP install is the exact reason his connecting rods destroyed his crank and bearings. IIRC ARP even tells you to do so.
Old 11-27-2012, 05:58 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (12)
 
kossuth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New Market, MD
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jlee29
Thanks for the advice. I did not resize them, nor did I resize them on my old motor that I ran up to 7200 rpms and drove 10k+ miles and still runnin. I guess I completely over looked the fact of resizing. Maybe I should just pull it down, clean it, and put new bearings, rings ect.. or I should have just left the rod bolts alone. Well trial and error it is for me....
If you are installing ARP bolts you at a minimum need to have the rods inspected after installation. Sometimes it distorts the big end, sometimes it doesnt. I have a set of 5.3 rods I put ARP bolts in for a 5.3 I'm building and the caps went OOR ( Out Of Round ) with the bolts installed. On the same note I also have a set installed in a set of 5.7 rods and the shop said they checked out fine (I don't have the tools to check myself). Long story short, if you are doing the bolts at a minimum ensure nothing got pulled out of whack, or that cheap short block won't be so cheap if you tear it up.


Quick Reply: Caught on fire LQ9 *Pictures*



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM.