high hp stock short block guys... question
#3
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some guys are getting away with running stock gaps, There are too many variables for a real guideline. Examples. Ring and cylinder wear (High mile engine will have more gap). Original ring gaps can vary from batch to batch, year to year etc. A engine that is "leaned" on harder and runs hotter will need more gap than a mild performer.
I am currently working with a low mile 5.3 that the cylinders look like new, the top rings gaps are around .016 - .018. I would be afraid to try my luck and push these too hard. I plan on boosting this one pretty good, so I am opening up the gaps to .024.
I am currently working with a low mile 5.3 that the cylinders look like new, the top rings gaps are around .016 - .018. I would be afraid to try my luck and push these too hard. I plan on boosting this one pretty good, so I am opening up the gaps to .024.
Trending Topics
#8
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no problem with the stock rod bolts and I am reusing mine. The rod bolts are more likely to fail at high rpm and not so much at any predetermed hp level. Stock rod bolts have been known to rev to 7500 and hang in there at 1300 hp.
Again on the ring gap, if you have a engine that is "Loosened" up some you may be fine. I like to base my engine builds around experience and accepted standards proven over the years.
Again on the ring gap, if you have a engine that is "Loosened" up some you may be fine. I like to base my engine builds around experience and accepted standards proven over the years.
Last edited by TurboMonte100; 12-29-2012 at 02:53 PM.