Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Too much head ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2004, 03:05 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
99SilverC5Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Too much head ?

....I ended up with a set of LS6 Stage 2 heads from a local racing shop...oversize valves... Comp 921s ...I'll be running them with a Comp 224 581 114 and the usual bolt-ons on a 99 C5 LS1... Would I have been better off performance wise with a 5.3 Stage 2 head? Why? I know I problably need a bigger cam to take advantage of the heads but will they cost hp with the 224?
Old 04-16-2004, 07:04 AM
  #2  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

eh i dunno if they will cost power, but you probably just shouldve saved your money and gotten some 5.3's...the reason you have the possiblity of loosing power especially down low is the port size...if the ports are very large that will give you maybe more cfm flow but will slow down the velocity of the air coming through which is what gives you tq.

lata
Bill
Old 04-16-2004, 07:35 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
 
JoeyGC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St Joe, MO
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Luther, calm down. The ZO6 heads will work fine with the Cam. If your really worried about every last HP. Then you could sell the heads and do a stage 2 5.7 or 5.3 . But I'd just get the car going and enjoy this nice MO. weather
Old 04-16-2004, 07:43 AM
  #4  
STF Veteran
 
99-LS1-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The good thing about those heads is that if you get a bigger cam you will be able to utilize the heads better. You can grow into those heads. You would probably outgrow the 5.3 heads. I don't think that those heads will hurt you too much.
Old 04-16-2004, 09:07 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
1QWIKZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

too much head???lol. i wish i had that problem
Old 04-16-2004, 09:13 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
McRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Corona CA
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

No such thing.
Old 04-16-2004, 10:26 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

LOL! Yeah, no such thing.
Old 04-16-2004, 10:29 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Country Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1QWIKZ
too much head???lol. i wish i had that problem
I seen this thread when it was first posted, but wasnt going to touch it, but this man sums it up LOL

Nice title


To answer the Q... depends on the valve sizes and runner volumes. Too much can cause lost performance.
Old 04-17-2004, 02:17 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
8POTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No such thing as too much headwork...more a case of not enough motor underneath.

I think as long as the heads are good quality and are shaped to provide good flow AND velocity (not just 'hogged out' for maximum flow) , then you'll be fine with bigger flowing heads. Your cam selection should make good power and down the track if you change 'bump sticks' again for a bigger, crankier jobbie, you'll be right to go.

Just make sure that when you get head work done, that port shaping was done with both good flow AND airspeed in mind. This is what gives you the best HP and torque numbers across the rev range (not simply up top).




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.