Challenger 392 goes down to a Mustang
02-23-2013, 09:22 PM
#2
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hill Country, TX
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=bTZfrNquSAw
I thought someone on here said they were fast?
This is about what I figured...
I thought someone on here said they were fast?
This is about what I figured...Track must be @ elevation but looks like the SRT8 out trapped and out E.T'd the Mustang, but lost the race because it looked like the SRT8 was sleeping @ the tree.
So this thread proved what?
02-23-2013, 09:29 PM
#4
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you stupid? or just drunk right now?? lol
This!
The 392 was still faster than the 5.0, by a large amount at that.
The 392 was still faster than the 5.0, by a large amount at that.
02-23-2013, 09:44 PM
#5
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-23-2013, 10:23 PM
#7
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
02-23-2013, 10:35 PM
#8
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hill Country, TX
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-23-2013, 10:43 PM
#9
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^
02-23-2013, 11:09 PM
#12
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hill Country, TX
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-23-2013, 11:44 PM
#14
Teching In
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hill Country, TX
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-24-2013, 09:44 AM
#20
Teching In
Stoppy..I hear ya but there are always some exceptions as to what people can run in their cars. Some do better than others but they are not the norm. The problem is that once one person has an amazing run, then people associate that time or trap with all of them. I think everyone always hypes up cars by a couple of mph or 1/10 of seconds in the 1/4 and this usually shifts the Bell Curve.
Regardless, moving that weight in the Challenger to a low 13 at 109 is moving pretty good.. IMO. I will have to say that I am a little surprised though at the 5.0 trapping 104...I could see a bad ET with a good trap but that low trap speed was a little surprising for the Stang..
Regardless, moving that weight in the Challenger to a low 13 at 109 is moving pretty good.. IMO. I will have to say that I am a little surprised though at the 5.0 trapping 104...I could see a bad ET with a good trap but that low trap speed was a little surprising for the Stang..