Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Passenger Side Truck Manifold Crossover Pics - More pics Updated 4/2/13

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2013, 11:32 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Passenger Side Truck Manifold Crossover Pics - More pics Updated 4/2/13

I have spent a few hours now searching all over LS1Tech.com and the web for inspiration and haven't come up with much.

First a little background, I am in the process of building a '87 RX7 with a 5.3l LM7 and a 76mm On3 Turbo. The car's primary purpose is to scare the crap out of me, but I plan on drifting it a bunch, roll racing and general hoonage. Goal is a conservative 400-500whp at moderate boost levels, and the ability to crank it up from time to time on the track (highway). Car should end up weighing in around 2500lbs. so that will be more than enough to make it a handful to drive.

My dilemma:
I am trying to package the turbo setup neatly and need to place it on the pass side of the engine bay. I have been looking for pics of crossovers and merges using non-egr truck manifolds that place the turbo with the compressor inlet facing forward and the turbo back tight against the engine. I have already cut off the flanges in preparation for v-bands. I have no need for a heater so there is worry for hoses out of the side of the water pump. I MUST have a filter on the turbo as the fender liners have been cut out for steering angle clearance. The further back it sits the larger a filter I can fit.

After tons of searching I can't seem to find good pics of a merge or crossover that places the turbo close to that location. Pics of something similar would be greatly appreciated. If all goes well and parts show up I should have some pics over the weekend.

One idea I had:

1. Weld pipe directly to the pass side manifold coming straight forward up the frame rail and place the flange right where I need it including the merge. The driver's side can connect with a v-band at either end.

Similar to this:


Last edited by Rogue Status; 04-02-2013 at 10:50 AM.
Old 03-27-2013, 12:21 PM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

was that, that dudes GTO front mount kit?

here is my ugly ****




Old 03-27-2013, 12:42 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I wish I had that much room Matt! That is in fact the front mount GTO.

I think my biggest concern is the merge itself. I am worried if it is to sharp or abrupt it will create a TON of turbulence.

I need to take a page from the Sloppy Mechanics book and just go out in the garage and make magic happen . . . barefoot!
Old 03-27-2013, 02:38 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
boostnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central IL
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Now I see why GM used 2 different length head bolts. That is some ugly **** right there.

Sorry OP, I've got nothing for you. Back on topic.
Old 03-27-2013, 03:30 PM
  #5  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

did you see the trick performance and KB racing manifolds
Old 03-27-2013, 04:04 PM
  #6  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

LOL. So much wrong there.
Old 03-27-2013, 04:17 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by denmah
did you see the trick performance and KB racing manifolds
I did Matt and I am thinking about something along those lines.

I have a few obstacles however, I can only run the merge across the front of the engine, under the crank pulley due to the engine bay layout.

In addition, I would like to use what I have. I don't have the disposable income I used to and have to make do with what I have.
Old 03-29-2013, 12:20 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well made some good progress tonight. V-bands should be here Saturday and I already got the piping from summit.

Ended up fabricating it how I mentioned in my first post. The merge came out far better then I expected and should be perfect for my application. I will snap some pics in the morning before I head into work. Did the best I could with a roll cart, vice grips and an angle grinder.
Old 04-01-2013, 09:03 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Was out in the garage both Thursday night and Friday night working on the crossover. So far I am pleased with how it has come out. Still need to add the 44mm wastegate and connect the pass side. Had plans to do this on Saturday afternoon but the USPS had other plans. Should have the V-bands today and hope to make more progress tonight.







Old 04-01-2013, 10:47 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
killernoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Passenger side manifold has to do a very sharp U-turn to the turbo, you are going to lose a lot of exhaust velocity in that and probably drive the backpressure way up too.

It sees like you had plenty of room to route the pipes like I did on my 240sx.
Attached Thumbnails Passenger Side Truck Manifold Crossover Pics - More pics Updated 4/2/13-562770_10100716740957393_542890968_n.jpg   Passenger Side Truck Manifold Crossover Pics - More pics Updated 4/2/13-61825_10100875916717893_1769451131_n.jpg  
Old 04-01-2013, 11:49 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by killernoodle
Passenger side manifold has to do a very sharp U-turn to the turbo, you are going to lose a lot of exhaust velocity in that and probably drive the backpressure way up too.

It sees like you had plenty of room to route the pipes like I did on my 240sx.
It was a compromise for sure. There were a few reasons I put the turbo there, asthetics, space contraints, the ability to run a filter, wastegate routing, ect. The car should only weigh 2500-2700lbs so if it hits 600whp I will be more than happy. The merge was actually pretty nice and even. I will get some better pics this evening.
Old 04-01-2013, 12:18 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Wow badass work!
Old 04-02-2013, 08:31 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Finished the crossover last night. Everything for the driver's side is just tacked. Figured it was time to go to bed at 1:00am.

I am happy with how it came out. Clean and tight to the engine, looks exactly how I wanted it to. I am sure I sacrificed flow, performance, and spool; but hey, it is an engine out of a Tahoe with a 76mm turbo hanging off it in a Mazda that weighs half what the Tahoe did. I think it will work just fine. Not trying to set any records, just build a fun car I can drift, roll race, track days (maybe) and on occasion drag race. Enough talk, onto the pics . . .





The following users liked this post:
Homer_Simpson (12-28-2021)
Old 04-02-2013, 04:25 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
tta656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue Status

thats some sexy **** right there...great job...do you think you need a flex joint in there

also what size pipe is that,

what schedule or gauge

stainless or mild steel

where did you purchase ipipe
Old 04-02-2013, 08:55 PM
  #15  
Launching!
 
tired2valve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man that's pretty nice.thats how I want to run my setup. Are you gonna have ps? If so stock location as a Fbody? Oh what manifolds are you using?
Old 04-02-2013, 09:54 PM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
LSx64Chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Fairfield,CA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Love it, clean and simple.
Old 04-02-2013, 10:56 PM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

that will work beautifully i did 2 kits similar to that 600+whp
Old 04-03-2013, 08:25 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Rogue Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

tta656:
Specs on the piping:
2.5" 16ga Mild steel from SummitRacing.com
2 x 180* J bends 5" radius
1 x 120* Individual bend 2.5" radius
1 x T4 undivided flange mild steel
2 x v-band clamps and flanges eBay.com

All said and done with shipping I have $135 into the whole crossover. I had a small chunk of ~20* left of the bends and plenty of straight. It was close but had just enough.

tired2valve:
No P/S right now. I properly de-powered the rack and will try it out with the manual steering. The car is gonna be light and mostly for drifting/hooning so manual steering should be fine. If it ends up needing P/S I will most likely go electric P/S. The manifolds are from the 5.3l, I believe it is a 2002-2004 engine as the manifolds do not have the EGR provisions.

Thanks everyone! I should be able to get the wastegate fabbed on there this weekend, get hardware to bolt the turbo on and finish welding everything. I am also going to add a brace to the pass side on the inside of the sharp bend. With the weight of the turbo I want to make sure that nothing is going to crack or bend. 3/16" thick 3" wide steel should do the trick. Going to try and make it look pretty with some "speed" holes.

One problem I have run into now is the wastegate placement. I really want to return the dump to the downpipe. My VW had an external gate and although it sounded awesome, I really want to keep the noise down. With where I have the WG positioned, it just barely touches the tensioner pulley without the belt on. With the tensioner moved to where it would sit with a belt on I have plenty of clearance. Should I worry about the plastic wheel and the belt being that close to the WG. I was thinking about switching to a machined pulley just to be safe. Thoughts?
Old 04-03-2013, 08:47 AM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
tta656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been doing alot of research on electric power steering systems,that might work easier for you.. thanks for the info.
Old 04-03-2013, 12:13 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
TPIIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You could always try a mini cooper electric power steering pump.



Quick Reply: Passenger Side Truck Manifold Crossover Pics - More pics Updated 4/2/13



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 AM.