Why does everyone think anything above 11:1 needs race gas?
#1
Why does everyone think anything above 11:1 needs race gas?
Ive seen some setups running a pretty good bit more then that. Effecient burning, some overlap to bleed of enough cylinder pressure, and Id think a small bore will go a loong way to being able to make some power on pump gas. As well as paying close attention to keeping everything very equal cyl to cyl
#3
TECH Senior Member
I wouldn't say that "everyone" thinks that. Like anything else, there are safe general rules of thumb, and then there's the exceptions to the rules.
I ran ~12.2:1 on 93 octane with my old 422 setup. Was it ideal for 93 octane? No, but it worked. How? Colder plugs, cooler thermo, cam with a healthy dose of overlap, timing set moderately, and a mixture slightly on the rich side.
Now I run 11.1:1 with my daily driver. It IS ideal for 93 octane. In this case the formula is colder plugs, cooler thermo, cam with VERY LITTLE overlap, timing set high/moderate, and a mixture set fairly on the lean side.
In the first scenerio I had an engine that ran *ok* on pump gas and perfectly with higher octane at the track. This engine's prime directive in life was to run 9s at the track while remaining somewhat drivable and it served it's purpose to a "T". In the second scenario I have an engine that runs perfectly on 93 octane but stands to gain practically nothing by using higher octane at the track. I wanted it to run perfectly on 93 octane (as it is my daily driver) and that goal was met.
I ran ~12.2:1 on 93 octane with my old 422 setup. Was it ideal for 93 octane? No, but it worked. How? Colder plugs, cooler thermo, cam with a healthy dose of overlap, timing set moderately, and a mixture slightly on the rich side.
Now I run 11.1:1 with my daily driver. It IS ideal for 93 octane. In this case the formula is colder plugs, cooler thermo, cam with VERY LITTLE overlap, timing set high/moderate, and a mixture set fairly on the lean side.
In the first scenerio I had an engine that ran *ok* on pump gas and perfectly with higher octane at the track. This engine's prime directive in life was to run 9s at the track while remaining somewhat drivable and it served it's purpose to a "T". In the second scenario I have an engine that runs perfectly on 93 octane but stands to gain practically nothing by using higher octane at the track. I wanted it to run perfectly on 93 octane (as it is my daily driver) and that goal was met.
#7
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GrannySShifting
Ive seen some setups running a pretty good bit more then that. Effecient burning, some overlap to bleed of enough cylinder pressure, and Id think a small bore will go a loong way to being able to make some power on pump gas. As well as paying close attention to keeping everything very equal cyl to cyl
run high compression ratios on pump gas. We're at a hair under 12.0:1 on my 408.
Trending Topics
#8
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
I was able to run 93 on my old 422ci, 12.2:1 it was. But I mixed in 100 for daytime racing at the track in the middle of the summer. At nite I ran just 93.
11:1+ is more of a problem for folks with iron heads.
11:1+ is more of a problem for folks with iron heads.
#10
9 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes I have heard that a bigger bore is more prone to detonation, my 422 is is 10.7:1 I'll just have to run a 200 shot to make up for it....... lol
BTW colder plugs (TR6) and 29 degrees timing on shitty 91 octane CA gas.
BTW colder plugs (TR6) and 29 degrees timing on shitty 91 octane CA gas.
#12
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Alvin Texas
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dazman
where can one get 12:1 heads from???
mike
mike
if you have to ask that you dont need any............not being a smart *** just telling the truth....
#15
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
Two things.
Aluminum has a lot more thermal loss than iron, so aluminum blocks and heads allow more CR than anold iron block setup.
Don't get hung up on static compression. Look at DCR...
Aluminum has a lot more thermal loss than iron, so aluminum blocks and heads allow more CR than anold iron block setup.
Don't get hung up on static compression. Look at DCR...
#17
TECH Addict
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it's all about dynamic compression and cylinder burnt efficiency. Boosted motors are well over 20-25:1 effective these days (folks getting hardcore), so if you tune to it be reliable, it will live.
Have cylinder selective knock retard helps alot
Have cylinder selective knock retard helps alot
#19
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dazman--
It isn't as simple as just throwing on a 12.0:1 cylinder head. If you're talking about wanting a cylinder head with a small enough combustion chamber to increase the compression ratio on a stock motor to 12.0:1, then you're going to have to find someone to weld the chambers and recut to your desird volume.
It isn't as simple as just throwing on a 12.0:1 cylinder head. If you're talking about wanting a cylinder head with a small enough combustion chamber to increase the compression ratio on a stock motor to 12.0:1, then you're going to have to find someone to weld the chambers and recut to your desird volume.