Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

t70 vs t76

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2013, 08:12 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1toofastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default t70 vs t76

I have a 383 9:1 cr with a 220/230 cam stock ported heads. Im gathering parts for a rear mount turbo set up. I have a master power t70 with a .96 ar exhaust. And I have my eye on a master power t76 with a 1.00 exhaust. My goals are 600-700 rwhp. What turbo would you choose for my set up
Old 04-19-2013, 01:19 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1toofastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anyone?
Old 04-19-2013, 01:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Bigger is better in this case. I'd run the T76 with the 1.00 housing. Another option is the On3 76mm with the .96 housing.
Old 04-19-2013, 01:44 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1toofastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hmm on3 76 sounds good. Are those good turbos? Im new to turbos so thanks for the help
Old 04-19-2013, 02:10 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
HRHohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

They've had pretty good success so far. There are several with builds on here. Good budget turbo. I like mine. lol I'm going to do twin 70s on my 72 Camaro build. Look up Wicked69 and his Chevelle. They've done good for him too. I believe they're copies of the MasterPower series turbos.
Old 04-19-2013, 02:15 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

76 for sure on a 383. Not a fan of on3 turbos personally and if you can afford a turbonetics or precision I think youll be much better off.
Old 04-19-2013, 03:09 AM
  #7  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,672
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

If you could fit a S475/83/ 1.0 ~1.1 T4 back there it would be worth the extra $.
Old 04-19-2013, 03:14 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
 
jridenour31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You need a bigger turbine than those turbos have.
Old 04-19-2013, 03:26 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1toofastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok thanks for the info.
Old 04-19-2013, 03:47 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jridenour31
You need a bigger turbine than those turbos have.
On a rear mount setup? I disagree but Im not a rear mount expert.
Old 04-19-2013, 07:53 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

T76 with the 1.00 housing or the PT 76mm with a .96housing will work good also.
Old 04-19-2013, 10:15 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The MP T70 and T76 are the same physical size. So if you have the T70 already why not try it first? But you will probably find that it's too small for your goals. I believe the On3 76 and Turbonetics TC76 are the same physical size as well. If you find you need more exhaust then Turbonetics has their new 7675 that will also fit.
Old 04-19-2013, 11:50 AM
  #13  
TECH Regular
 
jridenour31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
On a rear mount setup? I disagree but Im not a rear mount expert.
Yes, the turbine is too small as a front or rear mount, especially on a 383. A BW s475 with the 83mm turbine is a much better choice, although the turbine is still a little small.
Old 04-19-2013, 12:19 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1toofastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok sense im on a really tight budget I was thinking the on3 76 and I can sell the mp t70
Old 04-19-2013, 02:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
1toofastlt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Jridenour31 wouldnt the s475 have a lot of lag? I want it to make boost in the low rpms. I only shift at 6000-6300
Old 04-20-2013, 02:49 AM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
jridenour31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

No, it wouldn't. Although it won't spool as quickly as those p-trims, it will still spool very quickly with the 83mm turbine and 1.1 a/r housing, especially with a 383 and the right cam. Those small turbines run into backpressure issues very quickly on a 6.0 and you've got another 19 inches making it even worse. An s475 with 83mm turbine is very similar to a 7675 and those spool almost instantly.



Quick Reply: t70 vs t76



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.