LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

need to know if this will help or is it a waste for a 355

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2013, 07:50 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
unioncarpenter84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default need to know if this will help or is it a waste for a 355

i know ive had threads of this build



but anyone think my 48mm throttle body can be holding me back or should i do a 52mm or a 58mm




Lt1 350 bored to a 355
Heads ported and polished (flows: intake 278, exhaust 197)
CC Cam 230/242, .510 lift,113 lobe separation
Comp Cams Pro Magnum 1.6 roller rockers w/7/16" studs
Comp Cams 987 Dual Valve Springs
SI Silverline Series Valves,(2.00" intake and 1.57 Exhaust)
Eagle H beem connecting rods
JE Forged Nitrous Pistons
Crane Hardened Push Rods

Hooker Headers Long tubes.
3" Custom Made Y Pipe
Borla 3" exhaust

FMS 30lbs. Injectors (38 psi at idle never checked at wot)

3500 stall
410 gears
Old 07-02-2013, 08:29 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
unioncarpenter84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

any gains or is it gunna be a waste of money
Old 07-02-2013, 08:35 PM
  #3  
duh
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would go up to a 52mm. If nothing else, it will make sure there is no restriction. It definitely won't hurt anything.
Old 07-02-2013, 08:47 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
unioncarpenter84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i was going to do 58mm but alot of ppl on here say its to much sometimes

im was getting the intake ported to
Old 07-02-2013, 09:59 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
TAEnvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would run it. Ive never heard of them being too big, as in hurting performance. I think the debate comes to whether or not they are worth it.

Chris96ws6 (founder of ls1lt1.com) tested it on his H/C 350. He said he saw a higher kpa in the manifold with the 58mm vs stock.
Old 07-03-2013, 08:06 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
93M6Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

A ported stock TB (52MM) would be the way i'd go.
Old 07-03-2013, 08:19 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ahritchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 93M6Formula
A ported stock TB (52MM) would be the way i'd go.
^What he said. Cheaper and less problems than aftermarket TBs.
Old 07-03-2013, 08:35 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
unioncarpenter84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would a throttle body make me trap more speed
Old 07-04-2013, 01:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unioncarpenter84
Would a throttle body make me trap more speed
Almost certainly!

BTW......if you have a 4L60E tranny, you'll need to get the PCM tuned for the bigger TB.

KW
Old 07-04-2013, 05:07 PM
  #10  
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,397
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unioncarpenter84
Would a throttle body make me trap more speed
My testing on a stock '95 Z28 did not show that. Nothing on the dyno either.
A modified engine may pick up a little. My Super Stock 350" only pulls about 2" of vacuum at 7500, I doubt a 52mm would help much. Sure doesn't need a 58mm.
If you can borrow one for a couple of passes, that might be a good idea.

Last edited by Ed Wright; 07-04-2013 at 05:32 PM.
Old 07-08-2013, 08:36 PM
  #11  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
unioncarpenter84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
My testing on a stock '95 Z28 did not show that. Nothing on the dyno either.
A modified engine may pick up a little. My Super Stock 350" only pulls about 2" of vacuum at 7500, I doubt a 52mm would help much. Sure doesn't need a 58mm.
If you can borrow one for a couple of passes, that might be a good idea.
so ur saying just save my money ed?? no need for either ??
Old 07-08-2013, 09:19 PM
  #12  
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,397
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I don't think you will see much. As I said, a stock engine saw nothing. My 355" saw damn near nothing from a 52mm. To test it correctly go to the track and what most racers do: A-B-A testing. Make two or three identical runs, put the new one on and make a couple. If it picks up, put the old one back on for a couple. Average runs both ways. Let us know.
Old 07-09-2013, 08:46 AM
  #13  
TECH Regular
 
HellTeeOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't think you stand to gain anything from a 52 or 58. If you want to do something, just put a $30 airfoil in the stocker and run it. Spend the $300-$400 an aftermarket tb costs on something else.
Old 07-09-2013, 09:40 AM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
quik95lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

this is one area I don't really buy into the smaller is better thing........I ran a 58mm on my 355 with TFS heads and a 234/242 cam and the thing ran its *** off, ran with heads cam ls1 Camaros all day trapped 120+ at 3450 lbs....not saying that's all that did it lol but just saying I think it helped my situation....I have never done back to back tests on them however
Old 07-09-2013, 09:55 AM
  #15  
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,397
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Only way you can know is go to the track and back-to-back-to-back test it! Saying "I think my car is fast, and I had one, so it must be good" is bogus.
If you want to look at it that way my NA 350" has gone nines at 3300 lbs with a stock TB, and pulls almost no vacuum. Means nothing.

Only way for you to find out is go test it. Not make a pass, change and make another and call that the results. Any change will be within what your runs vary anyway. It's called A-B-A testing, but most guys are too lazy to do it. All the top, actual racers do that. Guys that can't figure out why somebody else is faster do not. Or, in their little world they don't encounter the faster guys, so think they have it figured out.

Will it slow your car down? Of course not.
Will it make your car faster ? Probably not.

Last edited by Ed Wright; 07-09-2013 at 11:52 AM.
Old 07-09-2013, 07:10 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TAEnvy
I would run it. Ive never heard of them being too big, as in hurting performance. I think the debate comes to whether or not they are worth it.

Chris96ws6 (founder of ls1lt1.com) tested it on his H/C 350. He said he saw a higher kpa in the manifold with the 58mm vs stock.
Are you saying he saw higher pressure or vacuum?


A lot of folks chase KPA on LT1s but given the MAP location I believe Bernoulli effect begins to sway the readings.
Old 07-09-2013, 07:27 PM
  #17  
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,397
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Are you saying he saw higher pressure or vacuum?


A lot of folks chase KPA on LT1s but given the MAP location I believe Bernoulli effect begins to sway the readings.
I explained this in another thread. I don't think many get it. Look where the MAP is mounted. You would think that would turn on a light. It has been discussed before. "Chasing KPA" like that is a dumb- assed deal. Think about it.
Old 07-09-2013, 07:41 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I have mentioned my Bernoulli effect theory before, probably in the same threads.

What I was saying in mentioning Bernoulli effect is I don't believe the stock MAP in the stock location accurate enough to gauge this.
Old 07-09-2013, 07:44 PM
  #19  
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,397
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
I have mentioned my Bernoulli effect theory before, probably in the same threads.

What I was saying in mentioning Bernoulli effect is I don't believe the stock MAP in the stock location accurate enough to gauge this.
You are correct. It is not. Vacuum should be checked at the rear of the plenum.
I put a baffle over mine in the back of my sheet metal manifold.
Old 07-10-2013, 05:24 PM
  #20  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Jason94z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had a stock TB trapped 115mph (in my sig)
Put on a big mono-blade - idles sucked, part throttle sucked no gains.
I have a 52mm now just because it was the same price when I was shopping ... but am 100% sure a 350 is fine with a 48mm. They flow a lot of CFM.

Stock TPI/LT1 48mm Throttle Body w/o airfoil -- 783.0 cfm

Stock TPI/LT1 48mm Throttle Body w/ airfoil -- 821.9 cfm

TPI/LT1 52mm Throttle Body w/o airfoil -- 848.9 cfm

TPI/LT1 52mm Throttle Body w/ airfoil -- 898.8 cfm



Quick Reply: need to know if this will help or is it a waste for a 355



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.