Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

foxbody

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 03:28 PM
  #1  
sbf
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wilson n.c.
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default foxbody

i have a 98 ls1 thats going into a 89 foxbody.what oil pan to use ive heard ctvs pan not sure and which oil pump with the swap pan
Old 08-27-2013, 03:49 PM
  #2  
sbf
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wilson n.c.
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Come on guys it's a million foxbody swaps on here I no some one could help
Old 08-27-2013, 03:59 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
TDMKR496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Auburn Alabama
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yes, the CTSV pan is the way to go, I had one in my fox body swap. You can also use the hot rod pan but that hangs a little below the stock cross member.
Old 08-27-2013, 05:59 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
LS1PUNK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Fbody pan here.
Old 08-27-2013, 06:35 PM
  #5  
8 Second Club
 
LILHEMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in my neighborhood
Posts: 1,009
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sbf
Come on guys it's a million foxbody swaps on here I no some one could help
yeah and if you bothered to look at any one of them you would see that either the cts-v or camaro pan fit perfectly.
Old 08-27-2013, 07:20 PM
  #6  
sbf
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wilson n.c.
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LILHEMI
yeah and if you bothered to look at any one of them you would see that either the cts-v or camaro pan fit perfectly.
I posted help with pan not help from a smart ***
Old 08-27-2013, 07:23 PM
  #7  
sbf
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wilson n.c.
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1PUNK
Fbody pan here.
Does it clear the aftermarket k member or hang low
Old 08-27-2013, 07:24 PM
  #8  
sbf
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wilson n.c.
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TDMKR496
Yes, the CTSV pan is the way to go, I had one in my fox body swap. You can also use the hot rod pan but that hangs a little below the stock cross member.
When you use the ctvs pan did you have to run a special oil pump
Old 08-27-2013, 07:27 PM
  #9  
sbf
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
sbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wilson n.c.
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have a 98 vette engine and oil pan still on will it work
Old 08-27-2013, 07:37 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
BigEd_72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

if it is from a vette, it should already be a low profile pan. They arent known for having big pans on them unless the goofy looking batwing pan. stock pump should be fine, just make sure you also get the pickup tube and windage tray with the pan. I only paid $120 for mine after Jegs sent me two banged up sets with crap flying inside the box.

check my sig for the build. It aint perfect or pretty, but it is not far from running.
Old 08-27-2013, 08:45 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
TDMKR496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Auburn Alabama
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I tested some motor mounts for Dirty Dingo for the LS/fox body swap, so I have tried the F body, CTSV, and Hot Rod pan with stock and tubular k members. The f body pan required the factory K member to be notched, but you could use it. The CTSV pan bolts right in but is pretty expensive. All used the stock oil pump but had to use the windage tray and pickup dedicated to each pan.
Old 08-28-2013, 09:44 AM
  #12  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
gm-ntmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I used the hot rod pan on mine with a aje k-member it sits at the same height as my trans pan. I'm happy with it and its cheap.
Old 08-29-2013, 10:36 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
N20neenee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I used 98 Z28 pan along with AJE-swap K-member. I will try to get a pic, but I think it fits fine and not too low
Old 08-30-2013, 10:55 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
usdmholden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The fbody pan should fit with the aftermarket k members. I have one on my Maximum Motorsports 4.6 k member using modified 4.6 mounts and no mod motor mount adapters, it fits fine.

The pic does not show the rack, but there is about 1/2" clearance between the rack and the pan WITHOUT using the mod motor adapter plates (3/8" thick). This clearance measurement is with the MM bumpsteer adjusters setting the rack upwards 3/8". This pic is also with the engine set forward .180". I am making new motor mounts to move the engine back .500" (hopefully) behind the normal mounting position (.680" back from where it is), and down as low as I can get it (probably .500"-.550"). I hammered the firewall with a 20 lb sledge to clearance the passenger side cylinder head to be able to move the engine back this far, while still being able to drop it in the engine bay with the T56 attached.

You cannot see it in the picture, but the bottom of the fbody oil pan sump sits above the bottom of the MM k member by at least 1.5 inches. The minimum clearance area is between the front of the pan and the steering rack.

Using a .375" thick mod motor mount adapter plate would put the engine .265" higher in the chassis and give you an additional .265" clearance. If you put the rack in the standard position, you would have another .375" clearance. If you are building a drag car with front skinnies, you could reverse the rack adjusters and drop the rack for additional clearance. Bumpsteer with skinnies is irrelevant.

The modified motor mounts are just cheapo CJ Pony Parts solid mounts which I cut and bent and welded 3/16" angle steel onto.

I honestly don't see how you will make a batwing oil pan work. There is a reason they are cheap, it is because nobody wants them.
Attached Thumbnails foxbody-mmk_small.jpg   foxbody-mount_small.jpg  
Old 08-30-2013, 11:26 AM
  #15  
Staging Lane
 
damon0346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i used a cts-v pan with team Z k member no problems.
Old 08-30-2013, 03:14 PM
  #16  
8 Second Club
 
LILHEMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in my neighborhood
Posts: 1,009
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by usdmholden

I honestly don't see how you will make a batwing oil pan work. There is a reason they are cheap, it is because nobody wants them.
he didnt ask for any smart assedness
Old 08-31-2013, 05:26 PM
  #17  
Teching In
 
red347lx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Team Z has a new k member that you can use ANY oil pan with. I have one with the f body pan.
Old 08-31-2013, 07:06 PM
  #18  
Launching!
 
tired2valve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fbody pan in my 99 gt here
Old 08-31-2013, 07:13 PM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Sarg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I used the AJE k member. Truck pan was too low for me. Muscle car pan, same thing, but better. The F-body pan was perfect and fit nice.



Quick Reply: foxbody



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.