Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Autoblog - 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport Twin Turbo

Old 09-16-2013, 02:12 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Autoblog - 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport Twin Turbo

Bridging The Gap With Power And Poise



As you read these words, West Coast Editor Michael Harley is preparing to drive the brand-new 2014 Cadillac CTS along the gorgeous, sun-drenched roads of Southern California. And while I'll wait for Harley's full report before I put words in his mouth, I'm willing to bet he enjoys the hell out of Cadillac's new CTS. In fact, I'm sure of it.

I say this with confidence because, about a month ago, I spent the better part of a day flogging the new CTS Vsport around the 2.9-mile Milford Road Course – a challenging circuit laid out in the infield of an oval test track at GM's proving grounds in southeast Michigan. The MRC was built about a decade ago after Bob Lutz was lured out of retirement to work closely with GM's product development team, and thus, this circuit is known informally as the "Lutz Ring." The main objective of the MRC was to have an in-house facility for engineers to fine-tune vehicle dynamics, without having to constantly schlep cars over to Germany's infamous Nürburgring. (Of course, they still do.)

To drive the new CTS on the very track where it was honed was an incredibly rewarding experience. This Vsport, folks, is something very special.

Because Harley will be filing his report of the new CTS in relatively short order, I'll spare you many of the technical details that he'll no doubt cover in his story. The long and short of it: this 2014 CTS is lower, lighter and leaner than its predecessor, and there's a whole mess of specifications to prove that statement. In some configurations, the new CTS is as much as 250 pounds lighter than the outgoing model, and compared to a BMW 5 Series, the Cadillac is anywhere from 200 to 400 pounds skinnier, depending on engine and trim.

This massive weight savings comes though the use of aluminum components throughout the entire body, including the doors, engine cradle, bumpers, pillars, instrument panel structure and shock towers. Not only does this reduce weight, but in some areas, it's actually more cost effective, and it has allowed Cadillac to tune the CTS in such a way that it achieves a perfect 50/50 weight distribution. Win-win.




All that lightweight goodness is wrapped up in a package that is, in a word, stunning. The new CTS is a visual treat, incorporating all of the same Art & Science design DNA into something that is modern, elegant and oozes graceful aggression. The front overhang has been reduced, the ever-important dash-to-axle ratio lengthened, and the new body features highly sculpted panels that all work together to form a cohesive shape. In my estimation, it's easily one of the best-looking designs in the class – a design that you really need to see in person to properly understand how all of the little details work together. That large rear overhang still looks a bit lengthy from some angles, and the rear view isn't nearly as powerful as the front, but have a glance of the 2014 CTS next to the 2013 model and, well, the improvement is massive.

Speaking of massive, get a load of what's under the hood of the Vsport – a brand-new, twin-turbocharged, direct-injected 3.6-liter V6 that pumps out 420 horsepower at 5,750 rpm and 430 pound-feet of torque at 3,500 rpm. That's some serious power for a V6, especially when you consider that the twin-turbo 4.6-liter V8 of a Mercedes-Benz E550 is actually less powerful, at least in terms of horsepower, than Cadillac's new six-cylinder. This new TTV6 engine will find a home in more places than just the CTS Vsport – a detuned version already exists under the hood of the new XTS Vsport, and fitting this inside of the upcoming ATS-V seems like it'd make a whole lot of sense. Here in the 3,952-pound CTS Vsport, this engine is enough to scoot the rear-drive sedan to 60 miles per hour in just 4.6 seconds.

Cadillac has employed electronic sound enhancement in the CTS Vsport, allowing drivers to hear the roar of the 3.6-liter twin-turbo engine at different volumes depending on driving style. This is a sweet-sounding engine, to be sure, and Cadillac's system uses small microphones placed underneath the hood to then pipe-in engine noise through the car's audio system. In Tour mode, things are pretty tame, though you can still hear a nice, pronounced engine note, but in Track mode, the bellowing engine noise is at full volume, and I must say, its rich, deep tones are almost V8-like. On aural delight alone, the CTS Vsport is easily better than anything offered by the Germans without a full-spec M or AMG treatment.



This engine is mated solely to a new eight-speed automatic transmission with a sport mode and steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters. And while I only drove the CTS in full attack mode on the Milford Road Course, this slick new cogswapper never once felt laggy or lazy. Shifts were executed precisely and quickly, and when left to its own devices in Track mode, gears were eagerly held until redline and downshifts under braking were fired off as if I were ordering the changes myself.
Old 09-16-2013, 02:13 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The new Track mode is a key part of the dynamic Vsport experience. Cadillac is now offering its fantastic Magnetic Ride Control on standard CTS models, and with the Vsport, this sportiest setting joins the normal Tour, Sport and Snow/Ice modes. Track mode enhances steering weight, and the Vsport's ratio is quicker than lesser CTS models (15.4:1 vs. 15.5 for RWD and 16.2 for AWD models), the right ingredients for a command performance. Track mode also adjusts the Magnetic Ride Control calibrations to allow for the best possible handling experience under extreme situations. In other words, it'll let you have oodles of fun while still keeping the electronic nannies on the sidelines to step in if things get too unruly.




But even so, the CTS is easily controllable with light, direct steering and adaptive suspension damping that provides excellent feedback at all times. The car has subtle amounts of body roll in corners, but it's nothing that isn't par for the class – the MacPherson front and five-link rear suspension setups are nicely tuned for what the CTS Vsport needs to offer. On one hand, it should be able to haul *** around Milford, but it also needs to serve duty as a smooth, comfortable luxury sedan on public roads. The whole package feels like a more refined, less-powerful version of the current CTS-V, and turn after turn, the Vsport went exactly where it was pointed with perfect poise. Of course, the Vsport's 245/40-series 18-inch wheels wrapped in Pirelli PZero tires certainly aided things here. Interestingly, Cadillac has chosen not to offer 19-inch wheels – available elsewhere in the CTS range – on the Vsport, saying that the combination of the 18s and PZero tires provides the best possible handling results.

Every corner of the Milford course is designed to test the limits of a car's chassis, and in some cases, you need to purposely do things like brake mid-corner to get the stability control system to flex its muscles. And in every single case, the CTS powered through each turn with good levels of feedback and a direct, lightweight feel that inspired confidence in the driver and made me want to keep pushing harder and harder. I'll need to get the CTS Vsport out onto public roads before giving a final judgment to the ride/handling balance, but on the track, it was sublime. To be fair, GM has the home turf advantage here, having me drive the car at Milford, where the car was tuned. Even so, the whole package feels like a larger, faster ATS, and that's a fine compliment, considering how Cadillac's smaller sedan is wooing critics these days.




Shard lineage with the ATS is apparent inside the CTS, as well, with a substantially updated cabin lined with premium materials in a variety of colors, accented with aluminum, wood and faux carbon fiber inlays. Cadillac will even reportedly offer to swap out the accent panels at the dealership level, increasing the overall level of customization possibilities. The testers I drove were all very early pre-production units, so I won't judge things like panel gaps or, you know, exposed wires, but on the whole, everything inside the CTS is super nice and comfy. Visibility from all angles is generally good, and the interior feels familiar, if only because it doesn't stray too far from the ATS' design.

Uplevel CTS models get the full-LCD instrument panel with reconfigurable displays, sort of like what's available in the XTS. On the lower end, though, there are analog gauges like those found in the ATS, and if I'm honest, they look like a cheap solution here. Of course, there's still the love-it-or-hate-it CUE infotainment system rounding out the center stack, with the same haptic feedback controls found below. Thankfully, my day of track testing didn't require use any of the functionality found behind the CUE screen.



Pricing for the 2014 CTS Vsport starts at $59,995, not including $925 for destination, putting it a few thousand bucks below the $63,900 BMW 550i. Spec out the two cars with similar options, and I'll bet the CTS still comes in at a lower price, though the more powerful 550i is also available with all-wheel drive – the CTS Vsport is a rear-drive-only affair, and the twin-turbo V6 is only available in Vsport trim.

The CTS Vsport is really wonderful, and without a doubt will nicely bridge the gap between the naturally aspirated 3.6-liter CTS with 321 hp (or the base-grade 2.0T with 272 hp) and the next-generation CTS-V that's expected to pack more than 560 hp. If the Vsport is indicative of the CTS family as a whole, we have a real winner on our hands. But I'll wait for Harley's full report before making that declaration. What I know right now is that, at the Milford Road Course, the CTS Vsport is damn impressive, and that makes me incredibly hopeful for the rest of the range – especially the upcoming CTS-V.

Old 09-16-2013, 02:37 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
sick_tight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

visually i think the only thing off about this car is that the wheels look too small compared to the body. IMO

but looks pretty good!
Old 09-16-2013, 02:46 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I am a big fan. Like it alot.
Old 09-16-2013, 07:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sick_tight
visually i think the only thing off about this car is that the wheels look too small compared to the body. IMO

but looks pretty good!
I like it, but to me, the wheels aren't too small, the fenders and quarters look too big. Seems to fit larger wheels, the body may need to be cut.
Old 09-16-2013, 10:17 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Such a nice car, they should put that TT setup in the ATS and next gen Camaro (Non SS of course).
Old 09-16-2013, 11:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
sick_tight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by It'llrun
I like it, but to me, the wheels aren't too small, the fenders and quarters look too big. Seems to fit larger wheels, the body may need to be cut.
thats what i mean, you cant fit bigger wheels but the fenders make the wheels look way too small
Old 09-16-2013, 11:20 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
cmurphy9900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Myersville, MD
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The wheel wells definitely seem like they are too low on the car, which could be why the wheels look too small. The trunk is a little odd but other than that its a pretty cool car. Definitely like the twin turbo setup.
Old 09-17-2013, 12:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Spoolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone know if there are plans to put that engine in the truck line-up? Would be neat to see this TTV6 in the engine line-up.
Old 09-17-2013, 08:14 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Omg call the news GM did something good for once

Love everything about it
Old 09-17-2013, 09:18 AM
  #11  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The nose and the rear end don't seem to proportioned properly. The rear end looks pretty stubby in comparison to the long nose. Definitely agree about the wheels. Cockpit and drivetrain are stellar though. Definitely going to consider this for my next vehicle.
Old 09-17-2013, 01:50 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sick_tight
thats what i mean, you cant fit bigger wheels but the fenders make the wheels look way too small
Yup.

Originally Posted by unit213
The nose and the rear end don't seem to proportioned properly. The rear end looks pretty stubby in comparison to the long nose. Definitely agree about the wheels. Cockpit and drivetrain are stellar though. Definitely going to consider this for my next vehicle.
I like it enough for that, but I'm not really diggin' the rear either. The front looks fine to me. I just keep looking at the wheels and thinking, "Dang those look off." It's the body though, for sure. Still, I'd drive it.
Old 09-18-2013, 07:29 AM
  #13  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by It'llrun
Yup.

I like it enough for that, but I'm not really diggin' the rear either. The front looks fine to me. I just keep looking at the wheels and thinking, "Dang those look off." It's the body though, for sure. Still, I'd drive it.
But would you pay $60K to drive one?
Old 09-18-2013, 08:53 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
ramairroughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atoka,OK
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

C7 deja vu. At least they got the front right lol
Old 09-18-2013, 10:03 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
SparkyJJO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,195
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sick_tight
visually i think the only thing off about this car is that the wheels look too small compared to the body. IMO

but looks pretty good!
Looks fine to me. I'm glad to see a car not offered with dubs from the factory again. 18" is plenty. All these 20"+ standard wheels we've been seeing recently have gotten a little ridiculous.
Old 09-18-2013, 10:20 AM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
sick_tight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
Looks fine to me. I'm glad to see a car not offered with dubs from the factory again. 18" is plenty. All these 20"+ standard wheels we've been seeing recently have gotten a little ridiculous.
i agree completely, i wouldnt want anything bigger than 18-19's but the fenders dwarf the wheels and make it look like Geo Prizm 13's haha
Old 09-18-2013, 09:10 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by unit213
But would you pay $60K to drive one?
Nope... Just never saw any point in spending so much for a car. Perhaps if I were a multi-millionaire... Well, definitely if that were the case(if I could find the time between visits to Aruba and such).

Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
Looks fine to me. I'm glad to see a car not offered with dubs from the factory again. 18" is plenty. All these 20"+ standard wheels we've been seeing recently have gotten a little ridiculous.
I prefer the 16-18" wheel route myself. I looked specifically to avoid 19's or bigger when I bought new last month. They REALLY push those larger wheels and I think those ruin ride quality, cost too much and a generally unnecessary on anything short of performance or show cars. That said, the fenders still look huge on this to me.
Old 09-20-2013, 10:14 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
-Ross-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston/Alvin, TX
Posts: 3,828
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Please God let the 2015 Buick GNX look better and be faster than this thing. I think the exterior styling of this Caddy looks blah.

The price on this thing is just way too high. That's loaded to the max Audi S4 territory.
Loaded 2013 Chrysler 300 SRT8s are less than $55k.
Old 09-20-2013, 06:56 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
 
nanokpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The GNX will be based in the ATS platform, so it will be lighter and faster. I imagine it would be a two door as well, and hipefully tweaked for more power.

Also, this is not meant to compete with the much smaller, much less powerful S4.
Old 09-21-2013, 03:04 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DoggyB22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I to think the wheels look small... but other then that I love this car! Fast, looks good, & that interior!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Autoblog - 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport Twin Turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.