Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Quench on turbo engines

Old 10-11-2013, 11:08 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default Quench on turbo engines

I posted this In the NA section, maybe ill get more hits here

There's 2 ways to reach quench

Thinner head gasket such as .040 cometic head gasket, .007 piston out of the hole = .033 quench

.020 piston out of hole, .053 gm head gasket = .033 quench

My question is does it matter which way you go to achieve it? Cost wise the 2nd way is more expensive since you need to deck the block to reach .020 out of hole..

But is there a performance difference, side effects of doing it the 2nd way?
Old 10-11-2013, 11:33 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
socal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lake Jackson TX, south of Houston
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A quench under .040 is pushing an unneeded excess.
Old 10-11-2013, 12:52 PM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Stumped1215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most engine builders like as much piston in the bore as possible. Sometimes in the bore.
Old 10-11-2013, 01:44 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stumped1215
Most engine builders like as much piston in the bore as possible. Sometimes in the bore.
For turbo engines specifically?

Because most people shoot for .035-.040 area

I should be shifting around 6600-6800 rpm so I'm thinking a tight quench might not be so bad.

If I was shifting 7k+ then I should be worried with tight quench..

How's that take on it?
Old 10-11-2013, 02:40 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Stumped1215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As long as the rods are good you will have no problem that way. Some people argue the tighter .035-.040 quench is not important on a forced induction engine like it is n/a. Being it looks like you are running an iron block and most likely a shelf piston I would not deck the block if its flat and run a gm gasket.

I would not intentionally build any engine .020 out of the hole.
Old 10-11-2013, 03:08 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stumped1215
As long as the rods are good you will have no problem that way. Some people argue the tighter .035-.040 quench is not important on a forced induction engine like it is n/a. Being it looks like you are running an iron block and most likely a shelf piston I would not deck the block if its flat and run a gm gasket.

I would not intentionally build any engine .020 out of the hole.
Eagle 6.125 h-beam/arp2000
Diamond -2cc flat tops (2618)

I'm running ls9 gaskets/ 317 heads

I didn't pick that quench, I wanted my block decked and after assembly my engine builder handed me my spec sheet and it says .020..
Old 10-11-2013, 03:49 PM
  #7  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Stumped1215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man thats a tight quench. It might be timing sensitive. Just be careful.
Old 10-11-2013, 04:29 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stumped1215
Man thats a tight quench. It might be timing sensitive. Just be careful.
Tell me about it, my piston to wall clearance is .05 so hopefully they don't rock a lot and make contact
Old 10-11-2013, 04:48 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 178 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

At only 20 thou....you can be pretty sure they will hit the heads
Old 10-11-2013, 05:28 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
At only 20 thou....you can be pretty sure they will hit the heads
My quench is in the area of .031-.033, not .020.

Unless I read your reply wrong!
Old 10-11-2013, 10:47 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Turbos love 035-040 quench just like NA and it really helps off boost in a daily driver. Because LS engines are so easy to get good quench it's a no brainer to run 040 - 045 Cometics. By help I don't mean big power gains just crisper, sweeter engine that feels better and uses less fuel to do it.

Last edited by Bazman; 05-28-2020 at 05:14 AM.
Old 10-12-2013, 11:00 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (30)
 
SilverSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Pole
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Stumped1215
Most engine builders like as much piston in the bore as possible. Sometimes in the bore.
For big power gasket reliability and keeping the fire in the bore, 100% correct!
Old 10-12-2013, 12:50 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SilverSS

For big power gasket reliability and keeping the fire in the bore, 100% correct!
So I'm driving a ticking time bomb?

Just what I needed
Old 10-12-2013, 01:21 PM
  #14  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I've read all out turbo engines being .080-.100" in the hole.
Old 10-12-2013, 01:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nitroused383
I've read all out turbo engines being .080-.100" in the hole.
Yeah I've read a lot lately on that, but my quench is only a little tighter than most here who run ls9 head gaskets..

Average ls1 piston out of hole is .005-.010 coupled with ls9 gaskets, is about .040-.045 quench...

So there's a lot of people that don't run .050-.100 quench on here if they are running gm head gaskets
Old 10-12-2013, 07:36 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I had another thought, I'm running 317 heads and ls9 head gaskets which are a bigger bore than my current 3.905..

The valve reliefs on the piston are -2cc, and my PTV clearance is very big since my heads cc are 72 and my cam is a 225/225 .571/.571 TU1 cam

So what can the piston hit if the head bore is bigger than the cylinder bore and I have a lot of valve clearance with valve reliefs?

Maybe my tight quench can work!

Lol I'm trying to justify this but ^^ that doesn't sound too crazy does it
Old 10-12-2013, 07:40 PM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
 
Stumped1215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats not the problem. The piston will not hit the head with your quench. The issue is you have an increased chance of detonation. You will have to run less timing because it will be sensitive to it.
Old 10-12-2013, 09:04 PM
  #18  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stumped1215
Thats not the problem. The piston will not hit the head with your quench. The issue is you have an increased chance of detonation. You will have to run less timing because it will be sensitive to it.
I'm new to tuning, my plan was 91 pump gas w/ alky control meth... But I'm at 9.7-1 cr so maybe e85 might be a better solution in my situation
Old 10-13-2013, 01:57 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HexenLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Quench becomes more important when the engine is used on the street and spends lots of time out of boost. If you're going for peak power and reliability in boost, keep the piston in the hole. Most drag cars that push the limits of power per displacement (like the old 1200+ HP 4 cylinder hot rod cars) keep the pistons in the hole because quench creates hot spots, which can be really bad at high boost when the dynamic compression is already through the roof even with low static.

Basically it comes down to intended purpose.
Old 10-13-2013, 05:02 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HexenLord
Quench becomes more important when the engine is used on the street and spends lots of time out of boost. If you're going for peak power and reliability in boost, keep the piston in the hole. Most drag cars that push the limits of power per displacement (like the old 1200+ HP 4 cylinder hot rod cars) keep the pistons in the hole because quench creates hot spots, which can be really bad at high boost when the dynamic compression is already through the roof even with low static.

Basically it comes down to intended purpose.
Yes I agree, It's not going to be an all out drag car.. This will be a daily street driven car just like it was when I was stock..

I think there was a mix up at the machine shop and too much was cut off the deck, anyway I'm stuck with this quench unless I want to run a .060 cometic to open up quench..

Any tuners here think my combo would be hard to tune?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Quench on turbo engines



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.