Is it possible to design a cam for boost and mpg?
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northwest side of Chicago
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Is it possible to design a cam for boost and mpg?
So over the winter I want to get a custom boost cam for my car. My current turned out to have been specd by some one who doesn't know all that much and just kind of made it up off the top of his head. (non sponsor horriblebshop)
Specs are 232/236 .585/.602 115 +4 on xer lobes.
Since im going to change it out I was wondering if I could get one to work better with my 9.5:1 370 on boost and cruising the highway searching for better mpg.
Although fuel economy isnt a huge concern I thought it would at least make for some good discussion.
Alex
Specs are 232/236 .585/.602 115 +4 on xer lobes.
Since im going to change it out I was wondering if I could get one to work better with my 9.5:1 370 on boost and cruising the highway searching for better mpg.
Although fuel economy isnt a huge concern I thought it would at least make for some good discussion.
Alex
#3
Driving sorry....Exhuast duration smaller then the intake....im running a 227 223 610 115lsa cam. And it makes good power with a slight lope. Made 96whp over a stock 5.3 cam and 50whp over the z06 cam at the same boost
#6
TECH Apprentice
If you aren't so concerned with the fastest possible spool up then a longer exhaust duration will normally help power for a given intake duration without any mpg penalty. I find they spool quick enough and the difference would only be noticed on a manual from low rpm. The LS7 and ZR1 cams make good power and mpg. Going 220-224 @ 050 on intake will pick up good hp over the LS7/ZR1 cams but cost a little in mpg loss - maybe 3%, and about 5% worse than a stock cam.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Apprentice
I got 26mpg in a 4000lb sedan with a boosted LS1 with 4L60e auto on a cam that had 222 @ 050 I/ 226 E - manually measured not off dash.
Any cam with intake duration in the 230's plus @ 050 is going to hurt mpgs and bottom end regardless of lobe centers, but will pick up in the mid range and top end obviously.