porting heads for supercharged engine
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
porting heads for supercharged engine
many say it isnt worth the money..any1 have any real world data..going from stock 243s to ported 243s has to b worth power..
so u take an ls2 with stock head and intake running 15lbs of bosst making say 700rwhp...
now take the same ls2 add ported heads and a fast 102...the added airflow drops boost say 3psi..u pulley down to make up that 3 psi..how much power is it worth.?
so u take an ls2 with stock head and intake running 15lbs of bosst making say 700rwhp...
now take the same ls2 add ported heads and a fast 102...the added airflow drops boost say 3psi..u pulley down to make up that 3 psi..how much power is it worth.?
#2
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is something i came across...do u think it holds true.?
generally understood that .257 Flow_Factor is a pretty good measure
of HP expected per Cylinder for certain Flow gain
in N.A. engines
15 psi Boost Pressure has a potential pressure differential of =
approx 412.0 inches of water
( 412 / 28 ) ^ .5 = 3.837
3.837 * 20 CFM = 76.75 CFM increase @ 15 psi Boost
76.75 CFM times .257 * 8 Cylinders = 157.8 Potential HP gains
.....so subtracting various pumping + heat losses, etc.
gaining around at least double Intake Flow gains
which should easily be approx 82+ HP potential
generally understood that .257 Flow_Factor is a pretty good measure
of HP expected per Cylinder for certain Flow gain
in N.A. engines
15 psi Boost Pressure has a potential pressure differential of =
approx 412.0 inches of water
( 412 / 28 ) ^ .5 = 3.837
3.837 * 20 CFM = 76.75 CFM increase @ 15 psi Boost
76.75 CFM times .257 * 8 Cylinders = 157.8 Potential HP gains
.....so subtracting various pumping + heat losses, etc.
gaining around at least double Intake Flow gains
which should easily be approx 82+ HP potential
#4
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
The way I look at it is like this: Unless I was to forge the motor (and other necessary components) i'd just leave the heads alone. Any blower will easily max out the stock internals capabilities even with the stock HCI, so why upgrade the heads unless you plan on beefing up the internals at the same time. Just my opinion
#6
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lets assume the car and motor are built to handle 30psi. ronssnova makes a good point..but how much does the porting help.? Alchemist i thought the same thing till i started researching the top fuelers..here is some info...
Top Fuel Dragster - Doug Kalitta - { High Wing DownForce model }
April, Houston, Texas 10 Feet Elevation { NHRA specs }
30.04 Sea-Level Corr.Barometer, 66 deg.F, 45 % Rh, 91 F Track surface
60 Ft= .847
330 Ft= 2.150
660 Ft= 3.058 - 279.04 MPH
1000 Ft= 3.822
1320 Ft= 4.486 - 333.91 MPH
2250 Lbs. 496 CID 4.187 Bore x 4.500 Stroke
Peak HP= 7933 @ 6715 RPM Peak TQ=6205 { 8550 RPM limit }
6.8:1 Compression Ratio , 2.400 Intake 1.940 Exhaust valves
39.3 % overdrive on Blower
62 deg BTDC at Starting Line & 58 BTDC at Finish Line
1.940 / 2.400 = .80833 E/I Valve Ratio
2.020 SBC Chevy Intake Valve = 1.632 exh Valve at that same
Top Fuel Supercharger application
the Power is on the Intake side !
Top Fuel Dragster - Doug Kalitta - { High Wing DownForce model }
April, Houston, Texas 10 Feet Elevation { NHRA specs }
30.04 Sea-Level Corr.Barometer, 66 deg.F, 45 % Rh, 91 F Track surface
60 Ft= .847
330 Ft= 2.150
660 Ft= 3.058 - 279.04 MPH
1000 Ft= 3.822
1320 Ft= 4.486 - 333.91 MPH
2250 Lbs. 496 CID 4.187 Bore x 4.500 Stroke
Peak HP= 7933 @ 6715 RPM Peak TQ=6205 { 8550 RPM limit }
6.8:1 Compression Ratio , 2.400 Intake 1.940 Exhaust valves
39.3 % overdrive on Blower
62 deg BTDC at Starting Line & 58 BTDC at Finish Line
1.940 / 2.400 = .80833 E/I Valve Ratio
2.020 SBC Chevy Intake Valve = 1.632 exh Valve at that same
Top Fuel Supercharger application
the Power is on the Intake side !
#7
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
lets assume the car and motor are built to handle 30psi. ronssnova makes a good point..but how much does the porting help.? Alchemist i thought the same thing till i started researching the top fuelers..here is some info...
Top Fuel Dragster - Doug Kalitta - { High Wing DownForce model }
April, Houston, Texas 10 Feet Elevation { NHRA specs }
30.04 Sea-Level Corr.Barometer, 66 deg.F, 45 % Rh, 91 F Track surface
60 Ft= .847
330 Ft= 2.150
660 Ft= 3.058 - 279.04 MPH
1000 Ft= 3.822
1320 Ft= 4.486 - 333.91 MPH
2250 Lbs. 496 CID 4.187 Bore x 4.500 Stroke
Peak HP= 7933 @ 6715 RPM Peak TQ=6205 { 8550 RPM limit }
6.8:1 Compression Ratio , 2.400 Intake 1.940 Exhaust valves
39.3 % overdrive on Blower
62 deg BTDC at Starting Line & 58 BTDC at Finish Line
1.940 / 2.400 = .80833 E/I Valve Ratio
2.020 SBC Chevy Intake Valve = 1.632 exh Valve at that same
Top Fuel Supercharger application
the Power is on the Intake side !
Top Fuel Dragster - Doug Kalitta - { High Wing DownForce model }
April, Houston, Texas 10 Feet Elevation { NHRA specs }
30.04 Sea-Level Corr.Barometer, 66 deg.F, 45 % Rh, 91 F Track surface
60 Ft= .847
330 Ft= 2.150
660 Ft= 3.058 - 279.04 MPH
1000 Ft= 3.822
1320 Ft= 4.486 - 333.91 MPH
2250 Lbs. 496 CID 4.187 Bore x 4.500 Stroke
Peak HP= 7933 @ 6715 RPM Peak TQ=6205 { 8550 RPM limit }
6.8:1 Compression Ratio , 2.400 Intake 1.940 Exhaust valves
39.3 % overdrive on Blower
62 deg BTDC at Starting Line & 58 BTDC at Finish Line
1.940 / 2.400 = .80833 E/I Valve Ratio
2.020 SBC Chevy Intake Valve = 1.632 exh Valve at that same
Top Fuel Supercharger application
the Power is on the Intake side !