MNR-0

COMP CAM

INTAKE & EXHAUST .050" DURATION

LOBE CENTER SEP = 114.6 CAM DEG
VALVE OVERLAP = -9.1 CRANK DEG

INTAKE

VALVE OPENING = -4.5 'BTDC
LOBE CENTER = 113.8 ' ATDC
VALVE CLOSURE = 41.3 'ABDC
DURATION = 216.8 CRANK DEG
MAX CAM LIFT = .30728 IN.
NET VALVE LIFT = .52238 IN.
LOBE 'AREA' = 23.71 IN * DEG

EXHAUST

VALVE OPENING = 47 'BBDC
LOBE CENTER = 115.3 'BTDC
VALVE CLOSURE = -4.5 'ATDC
DURATION = 222.5 CRANK DEG
MAX CAM LIFT = .31197 IN.
NET VALVE LIFT = .53035 IN.
LOBE 'AREA' = 24.66 IN * DEG


Well what do you guys reckon? Whats makes a good street torquer CAM with a std. head? Would this generate more torque than the stocker?

jrp

iTrader: (16)

the tr224 112 would be a better bet, though that 216/222 would be a great starter cam and be pretty maintanance free.

trackbird

iTrader: (4)

That's good news. I'm looking at the same cam. I don't want to do valve springs every 10k (or even 50k if I can avoid it). And, I drive this one daily.

Kevin 276

You are going to have alot comments here about the cam being too small...Colonel recently posted in the transmission section about torque convertor sand cam combinations. I would go there and read the post very enlightening. However, my experiences are that is a descent cam if you are just looking for a nice streetable performance mod...alot of people on this board will say go bigger, but the key is what and how do you want to achieve??? I used a 221/221 560/560 114lsa for a year with great results very streetable in a a4, you could tell it had a cam, and ran a 12.20@114 on the track cam only.

Good Luck

lsx24

iTrader: (45)

Is that the popular comp cam thunder has listed also? If so & IIRC MTI told me over the phone it has less aggressive lobes than the TR series, but more than the XE-like hammer cams. IMO it would be an awesome street [sleeper?] cam with stock-like characteristics and heaps of tq.

mykdiver

I think the TR 224/224 is a very good beginer cam. If you care about streetability, if you don't go bigger, and get Edit.