High-Flow Cats-Worth it??
#2
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
It probably depends on the car, since different years start with different factory cats. On my 2005 CTS-V (LS6) I picked up 25 HP with 2 modifications one being high flow (Random Tech Cats) and the other being a lightweight flywheel. I believe at least 15HP can be attributed to the high flow cats. (Since I did not dyno with each of the two changes however, I cannot prove it.)
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MPLS MN
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
darkman you must have had some really restricted cats WOW! on our ls1's i would guess removing the cats would save you upto 8 rwhp & switching to high flow should get you halfway there. so maybe 4 rwhp. just my one cent opinion.
#4
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Another factor may be the difference in catback systems. The CTS-V has a high-flow cat back consisting of a resonator that is actually an X-pipe and low restriction mufflers connected with a true-dual 2.5 inch stainless steel system. So, on the CTS-V, once the factory cats are gone you are accessing a pretty good catback. I don't know how restrictive the LS1 cat backs are.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Senior Member
Cats are for appeasing The Authorities... high flow cats can't get an EQ#... so The Authorities disapprove... so high flow cats do not help you, leave them off, you're no more illegal than with them on.
(not to mention your budget)
(not to mention your budget)
#12
it depends on your mufflers... some will sound absolutely terrible when you remove the cats... i hate raspy tingy mufflers also... they make your car sound like a cheap barn door pos.... i recently removed the cats from my system and it just got a little louder... still has the same deep thunderous tone as before ... cant beat b&B exhaust for sound quality