Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

NW 102mm Throttle Body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:19 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
FLYZNTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default NW 102mm Throttle Body

Doing some research on these for use with Whipple 2.9. Reading about an issue with forced induction applications. In fact, at least one vendor says:

"These throttle bodies are a great upgrade for naturally aspirated builds. We advise against using them in forced induction vehicles. "

Was wondering if the latest iteration has rectified these problems. Anybody know anything? Real world experience?

Thanks.

Last edited by FLYZNTN; 04-05-2014 at 09:46 AM.
Old 04-05-2014, 09:24 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (48)
 
a98ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'd like to know why it's advised to not use them on forced induction?? I have a brand new one in the box so I hope it will be fine.
Old 04-05-2014, 09:39 AM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
FLYZNTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I pulled this quote from another forum partially explaining the issue.

"They aren't actually sucking shut. The internal gears, being plastic, flex as air hits the larger throttle blade. The pcm reads this movement on the tps and knows its not supposed to move, so it slams the tb closed and puts the engine into safe mode to prevent engine damage."

I know that this was being worked on but I haven't found where it was definitively addressed\fixed.

This is the DBW version.
Old 04-05-2014, 06:12 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (48)
 
a98ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Interesting. I have. Cable version though. Not sure if this happens with my tb?
Old 04-05-2014, 07:43 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
FLYZNTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I haven't heard of any problems with the cable driven throttle bodies. As far as the drive by wire models, the gears were supposed to be changed to metal to address this issue. I haven't been able to find any corroborating information though. Hope somebody will chime in. I'm not dropping 570 for a throttle body until I know for certain I can use it.
Old 10-29-2014, 07:11 AM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Dynospeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The 102nw works great on a roots style blower. We make a 4.5" intake for the ctsv's and have seen gains of 42whp / 64ftlbs with only a 102 tb and intake tube change. Depending how hard the whipple is being pushed I could see whipple gaining even more.
Old 10-29-2014, 09:41 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BMF_Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alexandria, Ky
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Mine is DBC, so not the same, but I love mine with the turbo setup. Never an issue for what thats worth.
Old 10-29-2014, 01:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Put one on an F1X car but no real feeback as we haven't done any runs with it. I am aware of the "no good for boost" thing but we decided to try it anyways just cause 1 person had an issue.
Old 10-29-2014, 02:54 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
tempoffroad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cable here as well and its seen 20lbs and never had an issue.



Quick Reply: NW 102mm Throttle Body



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.