Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

222/230 110 +4 cam ok for boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2014, 09:16 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 222/230 110 +4 cam ok for boost

Hey guys I have a 71 Chevelle I have gathered most of my parts for my Vortech blower build I will list mods below but I'm curios would this cam work for my setup I like the way the cams performs N/A just not sure about boost

Vortech V2 T-trim 3.8 pulley
Lq9/l92
Arp studs
Ls9 head gaskets
ls3 intake
EPS/Pat g 222/230 .604 .604 110 lsa +4 ground into cam
6 degrees overlap
Old 04-19-2014, 10:44 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I'm sure that's a nice driving, and sounding cam, but IMO that's the wrong cam for FI .
Id run a a cam with at least a little bit of negative overlap, something like a 222/230 114lsa +4 which has -2* overlap, but you'll still know it has a cam.
Consider having Pat.G. or EPS spec you a blower cam.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; 04-19-2014 at 11:05 PM.
Old 04-20-2014, 11:34 AM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hey thanks i might do that just hate to purchase a new cam, this cam has less than 100 miles on it
Old 04-20-2014, 12:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

That's an really tight ICL and LSA for a blower. I'd opt for something else
Old 04-20-2014, 03:36 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jaydub
hey thanks i might do that just hate to purchase a new cam, this cam has less than 100 miles on it
Yeah, I would think by looking at your cam specs that it should be fairly daily driver friendly with plenty of low end power. So IMO, you shouldn't have any trouble selling it.

Good luck with your build, and let us know what cam you end up going with !
Old 04-21-2014, 08:12 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i agree ill keep my eyes out for a decent blower cam
Old 04-21-2014, 08:41 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Dude, it's easy to spend other people's money giving free advice over the net, but I don't think you need to spend a cent on a cam.

No the cam is not ideal, but if you like how it runs now, adding a blower will not kill drive-ability. It'll save you money, and will likely run like Jack the bear. As long as you can get a good tune on it, I say you'll be glad you saved a few bucks. The cam you have is not huge, it's mild, so will be more forgiving. It might use a little more fuel, but no reason why it won't really make good power.

A blower spec cam of the same size is not going to add enough to justify the cost IMHO. I know that doesn't make anyone money, but in general what makes a great NA motor works well on boost if it does not knock and the tune is good, so try what you have first. Then toss it if you don't like it.

My 2 cents

Last edited by Bazman; 04-21-2014 at 08:54 PM.
Old 04-21-2014, 09:12 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jaydub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i think a lot of people get caught up in lsa but lsa is only part of the equation, from my understanding overlap is the real issue when it comes to boosted setups. my current cam is 6 degrees overlap, one guy i know over on lateral g running a 230/236 600 lift with a 114 (5 degrees overlap) with same setup 6.0/l92 vortech t-trim running 9psi with 655 rwhp
Old 04-22-2014, 05:56 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
95bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I put my cam specs in a overlap calculator and it said I have 15* of overlap!

Cam is a 238/240 112lsa....that's all the info it asked for. Is that right?
Old 04-22-2014, 06:48 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
6togo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Harford co. MD
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep 15* is correct!
Old 04-22-2014, 09:09 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Beanslsxnova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: waldorf,md
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Martin smallwood spec'd me a turbo cam with 9* overlap. I think you'll be fine as far as that goes
Old 04-22-2014, 10:16 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Overlap is pretty off soo not the best cam for the setup IMO, but ****, it will work pretty ok man to a certain point.

If you can find a buyer for the current one you have then sell it and youll have the money to buy a custom grind.
Old 04-22-2014, 02:53 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Beanslsxnova
Martin smallwood spec'd me a turbo cam with 9* overlap. I think you'll be fine as far as that goes
Sorry, but that really doesn't mean anything, unless you both were running the same combo with the same goal.

Yeah, I do think he will be okay with using that cam, but it's far from ideal.
Old 04-22-2014, 02:59 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
Yeah, I do think he will be okay with using that cam, but it's far from ideal.
This^^
Old 04-22-2014, 10:54 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
95bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99Bluz28
Sorry, but that really doesn't mean anything, unless you both were running the same combo with the same goal.

Yeah, I do think he will be okay with using that cam, but it's far from ideal.
Jeezus mine is prolly trash at 15* of overlap. All stock ls1 from tb to pan. Made 610/540 to the wheels tho on 10#s. Guess it isn't that bad.
Old 04-23-2014, 06:26 AM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,116
Received 230 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

If Pat G speck'ed it orig, wouldn't he be the one to ask?
Old 04-23-2014, 07:42 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by forcd ind
If Pat G speck'ed it orig, wouldn't he be the one to ask?
Says Pat G but also says EPS o_O



Quick Reply: 222/230 110 +4 cam ok for boost



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.