Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4L80e vs. 4L60e

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2015, 05:40 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (122)
 
Mike Cordero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 763
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default 4L80e vs. 4L60e

All around size, weight, etc?
Old 02-03-2015, 06:55 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Jake's Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,774
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Approx the same length. 4L80E is 30-35 lbs heavier. Slightly bulkier external dimensions.
Old 02-03-2015, 09:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
2nd Gen Fl 'bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On the coast of somewhere
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

C'mon Jake's. You need to explain as well on "how Much power" it consumes before it starts.
Old 02-03-2015, 09:54 PM
  #4  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Jake's Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,774
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2nd Gen Fl 'bird
C'mon Jake's. You need to explain as well on "how Much power" it consumes before it starts.
I didn't see that question in the original post and since there is very little difference in the power "consumed" between the two, I'm not sure why it's worth mentioning.

This topic gets brought up occasionally and in decades past it was the TH350 vs. TH400 argument, and these days it's the 4L60E vs 4L80E argument.

It's the same now as it was 2 decades ago when I started dealing with these things. It's a big discussion that has no relevance for most of the enthusiasts who seem to want to beat it to death.
If you make enough power to need a 4L80E, you are beyond the capabilities of the 4L60E anyway. The other aspect is that a dual purpose street strip car isn't likely to set any class records, so worrying about 5-15 HP in the transmission is a waste of effort. If it's a dedicated track car that is competing for records, it doesn't need a 4L80E or 4L60E, it would have a TH400 with alloy drums, or a Powerglide with not a single OEM GM part left in it, or a ProFlite, or a Lenco.

I've had cars go faster with a TH400 than a TH350, all else being equal. I've also gone from a TH400 to a 4L80E in a pretty serious street/strip car and not lost any ET/MPH (actually went faster).
Unless you are running mid 9's or faster, it's a waste of time to worry about all the "HP consumed" myths.
Old 02-04-2015, 11:50 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
2nd Gen Fl 'bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On the coast of somewhere
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just being a smart ***. The myths were more of the butt of the joke. Yes, it has been beaten to death.
Old 02-04-2015, 06:35 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (122)
 
Mike Cordero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 763
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jake's Performance
I didn't see that question in the original post and since there is very little difference in the power "consumed" between the two, I'm not sure why it's worth mentioning.

This topic gets brought up occasionally and in decades past it was the TH350 vs. TH400 argument, and these days it's the 4L60E vs 4L80E argument.

It's the same now as it was 2 decades ago when I started dealing with these things. It's a big discussion that has no relevance for most of the enthusiasts who seem to want to beat it to death.
If you make enough power to need a 4L80E, you are beyond the capabilities of the 4L60E anyway. The other aspect is that a dual purpose street strip car isn't likely to set any class records, so worrying about 5-15 HP in the transmission is a waste of effort. If it's a dedicated track car that is competing for records, it doesn't need a 4L80E or 4L60E, it would have a TH400 with alloy drums, or a Powerglide with not a single OEM GM part left in it, or a ProFlite, or a Lenco.

I've had cars go faster with a TH400 than a TH350, all else being equal. I've also gone from a TH400 to a 4L80E in a pretty serious street/strip car and not lost any ET/MPH (actually went faster).
Unless you are running mid 9's or faster, it's a waste of time to worry about all the "HP consumed" myths.
The trans will be used in a 1954 Chevy truck project. I will hav a 408 twin turbo on it but honestly, will be a time ti time show truck, with A/c but if I have some power from this engine, should I buy the 4l80e or the 4l60e would be enough; the truck won't be use as a race truck. Thinking about money spent and the real need.
Old 02-04-2015, 07:41 PM
  #7  
Moderator
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,054
Received 389 Likes on 298 Posts

Default

IMHO "twin turbo" and 4L60E should not be used in the same sentence.
Yes, a very well built (Level-7) 4L60E will perhaps handle that power, but it will cost $4000+ for all the aftermarket and billet parts; they are also tricky to build.
In contrast a modestly built (Level-2) 4L80E can easily handle the power and will cost much less.



Quick Reply: 4L80e vs. 4L60e



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.