hardened push rods yes or no? and what else should i change/get?
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Moundville, AL
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hardened push rods yes or no? and what else should i change/get?
i just purchased a comp cam xe-r 224/224 .581/.581 114LSA. and rev dual springs. my car is an a4 2000 trans am should i do the push rods or not? and what else should i change/get when i do the cam i have 90k mile son my car thanks chris
#2
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USN, Haze Grey and Underway
Posts: 2,900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by ta_silver_bullet
i just purchased a comp cam xe-r 224/224 .581/.581 114LSA. and rev dual springs. my car is an a4 2000 trans am should i do the push rods or not? and what else should i change/get when i do the cam i have 90k mile son my car thanks chris
I got the trick flow 7.4" hardened rods from summit for $84.
Last edited by Z28Venom; 06-06-2004 at 02:44 AM.
#3
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't get the hardened rods when I did my swap cause if the pushrods bend they can be replaced easily and cheaply. If something goes wrong and they don't bend something else in there will and could cause much worse damage than a bent pushrod.
#4
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
as stated by Fulton 1
The pushrod was never designed to be a fusible link in the valvetrain. Several years ago we even had a member (might have been in the old LS1.com days) that was an engineer from Jesel (don't recall his ID) and he was adamantly opposed to the notion that the LS1 pushrods were designed to break in the event of a mechanical over-rev. The job of the pushrod is to accurately transmit the motion of the cam lobe (via the rocker arm) to the valve. If it’s flexing under load, then its simply not doing its job.
Look at it this way; you CAN mechanically over-rev any engine - pushrod, OHC, rotary, or otherwise - and cause damage. There is nothing unique or special about the LS1 pushrods making them fusible.
This is like saying that you broke your ring gear on a missed shift so therefore everybody should continue using the weak 10-bolt rear ends. Just a silly, backwards argument IMO - especially when you're considered an aggressive cam with heavier valve springs
i agree wholeheartedly with that assesment. im running TR hardened PR's w/o issue. **** far as what else you need i'd get a new pump and chain seeing your car has 90k miles on it.
The pushrod was never designed to be a fusible link in the valvetrain. Several years ago we even had a member (might have been in the old LS1.com days) that was an engineer from Jesel (don't recall his ID) and he was adamantly opposed to the notion that the LS1 pushrods were designed to break in the event of a mechanical over-rev. The job of the pushrod is to accurately transmit the motion of the cam lobe (via the rocker arm) to the valve. If it’s flexing under load, then its simply not doing its job.
Look at it this way; you CAN mechanically over-rev any engine - pushrod, OHC, rotary, or otherwise - and cause damage. There is nothing unique or special about the LS1 pushrods making them fusible.
This is like saying that you broke your ring gear on a missed shift so therefore everybody should continue using the weak 10-bolt rear ends. Just a silly, backwards argument IMO - especially when you're considered an aggressive cam with heavier valve springs
i agree wholeheartedly with that assesment. im running TR hardened PR's w/o issue. **** far as what else you need i'd get a new pump and chain seeing your car has 90k miles on it.
#6
I think those explanations are weak. The pushrods have proven themselves to be a weak link in the LS-motors. I would much rather take the chance of bending a pushrod than bending a valve.