Can any tuners make sense of this
06-13-2004, 08:32 PM
#1
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can any tuners make sense of this Code:
ID CYLAIR INJDC1 INJDC2 FTC HO2S11 HO2S21 IBPW1 IBPW2 KR A ECT IAT LONGFT1 LONGFT2 B MAF MAP RPM SPARKADV TP VSS 103 0.31 4 4 22 0.916 0.885 6 6 1.6 CL 79 28 5.5 4.7 CL 18.03 71 863 30 11.4 1 104 0.29 4 4 22 0.92 0.907 6 6 1.6 CL 79 28 5.5 4.7 CL 17.57 74 901 30 11.4 1 105 0.28 5 5 22 0.911 0.92 6 6 1.5 CL 79 28 5.5 4.7 CL 17.64 75 933 30.5 11.4 2 106 0.28 5 5 22 0.911 0.881 6 6 1.5 CL 79 28 5.5 4.7 CL 17.57 74 956 31 11.4 2 114 0.27 6 6 22 0.907 0.846 7 7 1.3 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 17.56 81 993 27.5 12.9 6 115 0.18 6 6 22 0.933 0.916 6 6 1.2 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 13.05 77 1088 31 11.8 7 116 0.17 4 4 22 0.903 0.911 5 5 1.2 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 10.39 68 927 33 3.5 6 117 0.19 3 3 22 0.916 0.907 5 5 1.2 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 11.01 65 868 30 4.3 6 118 0.18 3 3 22 0.907 0.903 4 5 1.2 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 11.01 65 919 30 4.3 6 132 0.15 3 3 22 0.916 0.916 4 4 0.9 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 9.64 52 983 17.5 0.4 6 140 0.16 3 3 22 0.911 0.894 4 4 0.7 CL 79 28 6.3 5.5 CL 9.52 55 921 20 0.4 6 151 0.24 5 5 22 0.907 0.907 5 5 0.4 CL 78 28 6.3 5.5 CL 16.99 72 1046 33.5 10.6 7 152 0.23 4 4 22 0.911 0.872 5 5 0.4 CL 78 28 6.3 5.5 CL 13.64 70 898 32.5 7.5 6 168 0.28 8 8 22 0.916 0.894 6 6 0.1 CL 78 29 7.8 6.3 CL 26.66 65 1446 35 17.3 9 169 0.27 8 8 22 0.924 0.916 6 6 0.1 CL 78 29 7.8 6.3 CL 26.55 65 1458 35 17.3 9 170 0.27 8 8 22 0.916 0.907 6 7 0 CL 78 29 7.8 6.3 CL 26.43 66 1494 34.5 17.3 9 171 0.27 8 8 22 0.911 0.907 6 6 0 CL 78 29 7 5.5 CL 28.21 66 1547 34.5 18.4 10 172 0.26 8 8 8 0.907 0.907 6 6 0 CL 78 29 4.7 3.1 CL 27.77 65 1581 35 18.8 10 196 0.2 5 5 4 0.916 0.894 4 4 0 CL 78 29 8.6 6.3 CL 19.3 45 1447 39 9.8 14 197 0.21 5 5 4 0.938 0.938 4 4 0 CL 78 29 8.6 6.3 CL 19.59 48 1394 38 10.2 14 198 0.23 6 6 4 0.946 0.955 5 5 0 CL 78 29 8.6 6.3 CL 22.08 51 1459 38 10.6 14 199 0.23 6 6 4 0.951 0.951 5 5 0 CL 78 29 8.6 6.3 CL 22.75 54 1465 38 12.2 14 200 0.24 6 6 4 0.942 0.946 5 5 0 CL 78 29 8.6 6.3 CL 22.85 57 1454 37.5 12.2 14 201 0.25 6 6 4 0.929 0.929 5 5 0 CL 78 29 8.6 6.3 CL 24.63 57 1499 37 13.3 14
what gives
06-14-2004, 01:41 PM
#3
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mahwah, NJ
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This looks like a log from a launch for a very short time. I also get knock retard for a brief time like that, but believe it is false knock from drivetrain harshness or something. Why do you care if you get a few degrees false knock that goes away by 10mph?
06-14-2004, 02:29 PM
#4
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This isnt a launch, it is jsut idlin around normal driving if you look at the status i am still in closed loop i just took part of the log and pasted it. Aside from that the o2's are saying the car is running really rich
06-14-2004, 02:47 PM
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Your KR is all in FTC 22 (idle?). Very low RPM,
high advance, moderate-high MAP is a recipe
for ping. Long term trims indicate a significant
lean error being corrected (but O2s show fat,
so history and present time are discrepant).
Believe at idle you have both MAF and the
speed-density tune (VE) factors in play, do
not know your mod list and whether anything
like headers/cam are in the mix (which tend
to want low-RPM VE adjustments to make
idle right). It's just odd, that the LTFTs say
it wants enrichment but the O2s show rich
(which should index trims back down). The
setup may just have too much "swing" to it
(rich or lean, indicated or true, depending
on driving history) to ever be consistently
happy with one stable LTFT set? This is a
thing I suspect about headers, dunno if it
applies.
high advance, moderate-high MAP is a recipe
for ping. Long term trims indicate a significant
lean error being corrected (but O2s show fat,
so history and present time are discrepant).
Believe at idle you have both MAF and the
speed-density tune (VE) factors in play, do
not know your mod list and whether anything
like headers/cam are in the mix (which tend
to want low-RPM VE adjustments to make
idle right). It's just odd, that the LTFTs say
it wants enrichment but the O2s show rich
(which should index trims back down). The
setup may just have too much "swing" to it
(rich or lean, indicated or true, depending
on driving history) to ever be consistently
happy with one stable LTFT set? This is a
thing I suspect about headers, dunno if it
applies.
06-14-2004, 03:05 PM
#6
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My mods are lid/filter, 4.10, Fm 13 230/232 110 +4 no headers, stock manifold and a LM. the car idles with the ac on and doenst do to much surging but i feel its way down on power because of it being so fat but the LTrims are +