will a yank ss 3800e be good for n/a?
#5
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a Yank SS 3800 and I didn't like it at all. I never could get it to 60ft worth a poop, the best I ever cut was a 1.60 on motor and the hose and we tried all kinds of suspension tweaks. I haven't seen anyone yet cut low(1.3 to 1.4) 60's with one. I don't think they are all they are cracked up to be, I was very disappointed in it specially for what they cost and the way performed.
#6
TECH Senior Member
No one should expect to cut 1.3s with an SS3800....I mean, it's a 3800! 1.4s would be REALLY pushing it for ANY 3800. You'de need some really good power, light weight, and a little gearing wouldn't hurt either. If you picked a 3800 converter with the idea of pulling 1.3-1.4s then perhaps you should have done a little more homework. That's 4400+lightweight land there. A 1.60 is pretty dang good for a 3800 stall and is nothing to sneeze at, IMO.
The SS3800 should feel as tight or a little tighter than your average 3500. Low 1.6s with 3.23s should be no problem (high 1.5s with the right setup) and is what should be expected (assuming adequate traction of course.)
Remember, NO CONVERTER will show it's true merit without traction. If you cut bad 60fts on the bottle then that's a traction problem. If you can't get traction, that's not the converter's fault.
The SS3800 should feel as tight or a little tighter than your average 3500. Low 1.6s with 3.23s should be no problem (high 1.5s with the right setup) and is what should be expected (assuming adequate traction of course.)
Remember, NO CONVERTER will show it's true merit without traction. If you cut bad 60fts on the bottle then that's a traction problem. If you can't get traction, that's not the converter's fault.
#7
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well Colonel, my car is fairly light, I have a pretty good suspension set up and there was no spinning. I was coming out of the hole on a T brake in the 4L60E at 3800RPM. I have 28 X 15 X 10.5 ET Drags and I expected more out of it. I now have a PI 4000 stall coming out of the hole at just over 4000 on the TH-400 T brake same tires and I cut low 1.4's. Everybody has their own opinion and I didn't like the Yank SS3800. If you like it that's great.
Originally Posted by Colonel
No one should expect to cut 1.3s with an SS3800....I mean, it's a 3800! 1.4s would be REALLY pushing it for ANY 3800. You'de need some really good power, light weight, and a little gearing wouldn't hurt either. If you picked a 3800 converter with the idea of pulling 1.3-1.4s then perhaps you should have done a little more homework. That's 4400+lightweight land there. A 1.60 is pretty dang good for a 3800 stall and is nothing to sneeze at, IMO.
The SS3800 should feel as tight or a little tighter than your average 3500. Low 1.6s with 3.23s should be no problem (high 1.5s with the right setup) and is what should be expected (assuming adequate traction of course.)
Remember, NO CONVERTER will show it's true merit without traction. If you cut bad 60fts on the bottle then that's a traction problem. If you can't get traction, that's not the converter's fault.
The SS3800 should feel as tight or a little tighter than your average 3500. Low 1.6s with 3.23s should be no problem (high 1.5s with the right setup) and is what should be expected (assuming adequate traction of course.)
Remember, NO CONVERTER will show it's true merit without traction. If you cut bad 60fts on the bottle then that's a traction problem. If you can't get traction, that's not the converter's fault.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
Transbrake in a 4L60-E? That's a rare one. I wouldn't have picked a 3800 stall for a 28" slicked transbraked car if NA times were to optimized and especially if 1.3 60fts were the goal. 1.60s are really good for a 3800 stall running NA...I don't think I've EVER heard of a true 3800 stall pulling 1.3 to low 1.4s NA. I don't know why you would have expected those kind of short times running NA if you did. You should have been able to see the 1.3s on the bottle, however.
Anyway, glad you found a converter that's working for you.
Anyway, glad you found a converter that's working for you.
#9
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 2,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah the brake worked pretty well the tranny just couldn't handle the HP's we were throwing at it.
Originally Posted by Colonel
Transbrake in a 4L60-E? That's a rare one. I wouldn't have picked a 3800 stall for a 28" slicked transbraked car if NA times were to optimized and especially if 1.3 60fts were the goal. 1.60s are really good for a 3800 stall running NA...I don't think I've EVER heard of a true 3800 stall pulling 1.3 to low 1.4s NA. I don't know why you would have expected those kind of short times running NA if you did. You should have been able to see the 1.3s on the bottle, however.
Anyway, glad you found a converter that's working for you.
Anyway, glad you found a converter that's working for you.
#13
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Arlington, TX Congestion City
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Nope it didn't kill mine. It's all in the foot. I can drive quite normally without spinning on street tires. Take off around 2600 - 3000 RPM's as well.
If I am sitting at a light even with a descent incline my car creeps forward. I might want to add that my PT has a 2.8 STR. It is not too loose for me and has a descent advantage of looseness over the SS3800 I had.
If I am sitting at a light even with a descent incline my car creeps forward. I might want to add that my PT has a 2.8 STR. It is not too loose for me and has a descent advantage of looseness over the SS3800 I had.
Last edited by 94form2000z; 06-28-2004 at 03:50 PM.