New cam, brakes suffer from vaccum loss?
#1
New cam, brakes suffer from vaccum loss?
I know on the older vehicles a larger duration cam makes the brakes not as responsive, I haven't heard anyone with a LS1 complain about low vaccum and poor brake performance after a cam swap, but I thought someone could enlighten me. Cam going in is TSP 225 225 .589 .589 on 112 if it matters any. Thanks
#3
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think you should have any problems. When it comes to older motors, in my experience its not so much the camshaft that causes a problem, but where you are actually drawing the vacuum from. The cam in my truck is in the 232 duration range with .500ish lift. When I was running a Demon 750cfm in my truck, stomping the breaks would kill the motor. When I switched to the manifold port for the vacuum I had no issues at all. The vacuum port on the Demon carb was on the front side of the carb between the primaries making the problem worse. After switching back to the edelbrock with the vacuum port in the back of the carb (secondaries) I could use that vacuum port without problems.
I think since the LS1 draws vacuum for the brake booster from the back of the intake manifold you won't have any trouble. If you were to pull vacuum from the throttle body, you make have a bit of trouble. I have never read on this board anyone having problems with the breaks or motor related problems because of the breaks.
I think since the LS1 draws vacuum for the brake booster from the back of the intake manifold you won't have any trouble. If you were to pull vacuum from the throttle body, you make have a bit of trouble. I have never read on this board anyone having problems with the breaks or motor related problems because of the breaks.
#5
Originally Posted by JoeyGC5
I've got a simular cam (224/.581/112) and see about 14" of vacuum at idle. If I was you I'd start looking for vacuum leak/ broken fittings or boots/ and loose hoses.