interesting 78mm vs 90mm LSX results
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
interesting 78mm vs 90mm LSX results
this is on my 383 stroker. dyno'd with open headers with 15" extension, short-belt and no filter, on 28" slicks with 30 lbs of air in the tires. cam is 236/232 112 lsas .602/.575 lift. RMS Stage II heads.
only bad thing is that the 78mm was taken in feburary in 54 degree weather. it was 94 today here.... the red one is 90mm,
needless to say, I am NOT happy with these results this is a drag car, no top end HP gain sucks ***. I have no idea why it gained THIRTY rwtq down low though
only bad thing is that the 78mm was taken in feburary in 54 degree weather. it was 94 today here.... the red one is 90mm,
needless to say, I am NOT happy with these results this is a drag car, no top end HP gain sucks ***. I have no idea why it gained THIRTY rwtq down low though
#2
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (71)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Brady, Pa
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm this is a test I've been waiting to see. What were both sets of number corrected? Was your a/f monitored on both runs? I'm curious if any tuning is needed with the 90mm setup. Did you have any numbers with an LS6 intake previous?
#3
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, these were corrected numbers. previously I had done back to back dyno testing of an LS6 vs the 78mm, BUT I had 3" duals with an X-pipe then. these are the results from then.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/142454-383ci-78mm-lsx-results.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/142454-383ci-78mm-lsx-results.html
#4
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh ya... A/F ratio. with the 90mm LSX it was running a little rich at 6krpm+ about 12.8:1 finishing at about 12.5:1 at 6500. the 78mm results were a little lean at 13.8:1 straight across... don't remember why we were that high then
we did NO tuning with the 90mm. I really don't think it needs much if any either.
we did NO tuning with the 90mm. I really don't think it needs much if any either.
#7
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no, exhaust from 78 to 90 are the same.
from ls6 vs 78 both had 3" duals with X-pipe
then I went to open headers with the 78 and picked up 15tq and 10 hp
this dyno is with open headers, same setup. 78 vs 90mm
from ls6 vs 78 both had 3" duals with X-pipe
then I went to open headers with the 78 and picked up 15tq and 10 hp
this dyno is with open headers, same setup. 78 vs 90mm
Trending Topics
#10
I think tuning would be important and the weather (correction) could make a difference too.
I am glad to see such nice gains with the 78mm version though over the LS6.
were you running a stock ported throttle body?
I am glad to see such nice gains with the 78mm version though over the LS6.
were you running a stock ported throttle body?
#12
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
dang this is a weird result. i really think the dynojet software can not compensate for heat and humidity like out in the midwest (or florida ) but there is probably more in the tune. i would think that with your stroker motor and heads that the motor could really use the increased capacity of the cfm.
#18
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 383ss
oh ya... A/F ratio. with the 90mm LSX it was running a little rich at 6krpm+ about 12.8:1 finishing at about 12.5:1 at 6500. the 78mm results were a little lean at 13.8:1 straight across... don't remember why we were that high then
we did NO tuning with the 90mm. I really don't think it needs much if any either.
we did NO tuning with the 90mm. I really don't think it needs much if any either.
This alone could explain alot. Your a/f was alot different although I agree with you that the 12.5 current a/f is alot better than the 13.8,,, but this could be why you are not seeing the top end gain. You did get alot down low that so at least it wasnt a total loss. It would suck but you could always put the 78mm back on and see what it does in hot weather with the same a/f.
#19
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, I don't still have a 78 or access to one. I was just trying it out for a local shop... considering the A/F, it could be 10rwhp on the top end I guess. yes, I am SURE it is opening 100%. I had that problem on initial install and fixed it.
#20
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plano, Tx.
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is your lid and maf and tb combo?
I mean is your lid and maf still at 75mm and what kind of 90mm tb do you have?
If your lid and maf are still 75mm and you have a 90mm tb and intake then I can see why you didn't gain anything over the 78mm lsx since you would still be flowing only 75mm of air.
I mean is your lid and maf still at 75mm and what kind of 90mm tb do you have?
If your lid and maf are still 75mm and you have a 90mm tb and intake then I can see why you didn't gain anything over the 78mm lsx since you would still be flowing only 75mm of air.