Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Flat crank shaft for LS1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2004, 07:51 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Flat crank shaft for LS1?

Anybody heard of a 180° or flat crank for the LS1 engines?
Old 08-05-2004, 09:46 PM
  #2  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone?
Old 08-06-2004, 07:49 AM
  #3  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Nope, but do you know of somebody making one?
Old 08-06-2004, 04:36 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Outlaw13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i wish.. thats what i was hoping to find
Old 08-07-2004, 11:48 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
Old SStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Outlaw13
i wish.. thats what i was hoping to find
Why? (serious question, BTW)
Old 08-07-2004, 08:03 PM
  #6  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

There is no good reason for a flat crank. That's why no one makes one. The headers work better but everything else is worse!
Old 08-08-2004, 01:30 AM
  #7  
#41
Launching!
 
#41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denton/ Cypress, TX
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What exactly is the difference between a flat crank, and a normal crank?
Old 08-08-2004, 01:42 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Dope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wilmington, MA
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'm lost.

Dope
Old 08-08-2004, 02:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
z-ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: minneapolis,mn
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ya I wonder what 180 degree headers would look like for an f body.
Old 08-08-2004, 02:49 PM
  #10  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Thumbs up

A flat crank is a crank with two of the rod journals in the middle in one plane and the other two rod journals are at the ends and are also in the same plane but 180 degrees on the opposite side.

This turns a V8 into two four cylinders basically with even firing intervals to the header collectors but with irregular firing intervals in the manifold. It sounds different but makes less power. IRL cars are required to run these cranks so they sound like they do but otherwise they would not in this day and age most probably.

180 degree headers as someone was mentioning make the headers work like they would on a four cylinder by connecting cylinder groups that fire every 180 degrees just like a 4 cylinder would. This is also why equal length headers on a regular V8 don't help that much.
Old 08-08-2004, 03:39 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
1blkZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here is a good link describing different crankshaft characteristics.

http://www.e31.net/navmisc_e.html

FWIW, Ferarri is still using the a flat crank in thier V8's, but I think an LS1's rotational mass is far too heavy to be able utilize a flat crank design. Ive contemplated trying to build a flat crank 4.0L DOHC Cobra and spinning it to 8000rpms. I just have no clue what car to stick it in.
Old 08-09-2004, 07:57 AM
  #12  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Arrow

You can use flat plane cranks in most american race series but no one does because of the power losses. They even tried back in Pro Stock but basically gave up because they are slower. They are lighter though as that article says which is the reason that everyone tried them.
Old 08-19-2004, 05:56 PM
  #13  
Teching In
 
t_newnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well that is not entirely true. Flat cranks can actually make more power than a 90 degree crank and that is why the IRL uses them. The only problem with using one on an LS1 (which i would also like to try) is that they make their power with higher revs which a stock pushrod engine can barely get to but if you upgrade the valvetrain to make it lighter and use stiffer springs, then you could raise the rev limiter quite a bit and you would be more able to tap into the extra power you get from the flat crank.

I am not too sure how good they would be on the street with stop and go driving but on the track they would kick butt! That is why the IRL uses them. also because they are more balanced then a 90 degree crank that also helps them rev higher.
Old 08-19-2004, 08:24 PM
  #14  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Arrow

Originally Posted by t_newnes
well that is not entirely true. Flat cranks can actually make more power than a 90 degree crank and that is why the IRL uses them. The only problem with using one on an LS1 (which i would also like to try) is that they make their power with higher revs which a stock pushrod engine can barely get to but if you upgrade the valvetrain to make it lighter and use stiffer springs, then you could raise the rev limiter quite a bit and you would be more able to tap into the extra power you get from the flat crank.

I am not too sure how good they would be on the street with stop and go driving but on the track they would kick butt! That is why the IRL uses them. also because they are more balanced then a 90 degree crank that also helps them rev higher.
They are required to run 180 cranks in IRl otherwise they would not. They do not make more power. They make a different noise that Tony George and the promoters wanted in the IRL series so everyone HAS to run that design by the rules.
Old 08-19-2004, 11:21 PM
  #15  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve - Race Eng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oceanside, Ca.
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes on 36 Posts

Default Flat crank

I have a custom Crower billet Ferrari flat crank here for a special project I am working on. I thought it would help you folks visualize what Erik was talking about.

The flat or 180 degree crankshaft for a V-8 looks identical to a four cylinder inline crankshaft. The 180 degree crankshaft is balanced independently of the rods and pistons, etc. just like an inline four or six (no bobweights).

As Erik said, these cranks offer no improvement over a conventional 90 degree crankshaft in most applications. They do seem to work better with individual intake runners and only because the exhaust pulse tuning is better with even firing cycles per bank. Intake manifolds for the LS1 and most other V-8 engines were designed for a 90 degree crankshaft. Unless you have a lot of time and money to come up with an intake manifold that will work effectively with a 180 degree crankshaft you will loose power.

Another problem area is the secondary imbalance with these cranks. Other than using a pair of balance shafts there is no easy way to get rid of the imbalance.

Ferrari guys love the sound of the flat crank. Also, the only cams made are for a flat crank so I have no choice in the matter. I am taming down the secondary imbalance by using titanium rods and very light pistons in these engines.

Steve Demirjian
Race Engine Development
Sponsor
Attached Thumbnails Flat crank shaft for LS1?-ferrari-flat-crank.jpg  



Quick Reply: Flat crank shaft for LS1?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.