slows6

i have been trying to decide on which cam to get for my 2000 ws6 m6. All stock for now gonna go with ls6 intake long tubes and maybe a set of heads when my wallet lets me. the headers and intake within the next couple of months. anyways i was trying to decide between 2 comp cams.

216/220 @ 50 525 532 lift on a 114 LS
or
222/224 @ 50 566 568 lift on a 112 LS

the car is a daily driver (about 100 miles per day) i don't want to rev it to the moon, but would like some what of a choppy idle at the same time. thanks for the help.

hourang

iTrader: (6)

#2 for the lope

slows6

do you think the first one would be anykind of sound worth buying?

MurrayFormula

I would go with the 2nd choice to. Or mine is a 00 and a daily driver. I went with the TR .575/.563 230/224 111 lsa and it is driving great. The cam actually cam out on a 110 LSA when I got it and it still drives wonderful with the tune.

mrr23

iTrader: (3)

why not look into some of these cams? there are even some sound clips to go with them.

http://www.vincihighperformance.com/...%20LS1%202.htm

also some dyno results here from their corvette they are using as a testbed.
http://www.vincihighperformance.com/...ARPARENT2.HTML

hourang

iTrader: (6)

yeah the first one will sound a lot better than stock but not as lopey and cool as the second, i would really go with the second one unless you plan on going forced induction or want to stay emmissions legal.

slows6

well to be totally honest i want the second but all the guys at comp that i talked to said the 2nd one would be better for me????????????? i am confused they said since i didn't want to rev it to 7000 that the first would give me the most power gain.... also i heard anything over 570 lift would need fly cutting b/c or piston clearance

hourang

iTrader: (6)

first sentence didnt make much sence but that 2nd cam is not a 7k rpm cam, and should out perform the first cam throughout the whole rpm band. no you can run a lot more lift than that without fly cutting.