Are 2.055 valves to big for a stock bore 346?
08-12-2004, 06:53 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are 2.055 valves to big for a stock bore 346? Here is some heads I bought. He was running them on a 396 all bore. Will I have a problem with the bigger heads? Should I just not worry about them? Would I pick up more power going smaller valve?
ARE stage 2 heads upgraded to stage 3,
2.055/1.60.
Flow #: Int/Ext
200- 140-117
300- 199-181
350- 228-198
400- 252-207
450- 272-211
500- 285-214
550- 299-215
600- 312-217
ARE stage 2 heads upgraded to stage 3,
2.055/1.60.
Flow #: Int/Ext
200- 140-117
300- 199-181
350- 228-198
400- 252-207
450- 272-211
500- 285-214
550- 299-215
600- 312-217
08-13-2004, 07:56 AM
#7
The valve size is not the issue. I have 2.08/1.60s on my stock bore. If the heads you bought were on a 396 all-bore, then the combustion chambers have been opened up beyond the stock bore. You might ask whether that will have an impact.
Were the flow numbers on stock bore or the larger bore?
i'll have some ARE SII heads for sale soon if want some.
Were the flow numbers on stock bore or the larger bore?
i'll have some ARE SII heads for sale soon if want some.
Trending Topics
08-13-2004, 12:40 PM
#10
8 Sec Tuner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wish I was in a boat fishing...
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
The valve size is not the issue. I have 2.08/1.60s on my stock bore.
