Generation IV Internal Engine - Sooo...I have an LS2 intake conversion idea...
Another_User
08-21-2004, 01:12 PM
Since the LS2 intake requires way too much (let's be realistic here) to convert... Why doesn't a manufacturer just make a competitively (hmmm...no, I don't consider FAST competitive) priced intake with the exact same specifications, and a 90mm throttle body to go with it? I mean..it's done...they made it. The specs are there. It probably makes more horsepower than the FAST intake, and it has already been done, so it won't take a gagillion-gagillion dollars in research and development.
Or perhaps BBK is one-up on this one, and their magical intake will rock?
cyphur
08-21-2004, 01:52 PM
Hmm this would be too easy my man. A magical fix to our money pit woes? :bang: :jest:
Now that the FAST is out, and that the LS2 is out, and seeing that you could reverse engineer the BOTH of them, it would seem that any number of companies could reduce the cost of R&D by at least 65%. I am sure that many people would love to find a third option out there that mimics the FAST intake. The difficulty is finding a reputable company who has the QC capabilites that people trust, that is willing to undertake this, as well as any possible negative PR for 'copying' a product.
Hopefully you are right and BBK's intake is the golden band-aid for the intake market. We'll see.
Another_User
08-21-2004, 02:58 PM
Hmm this would be too easy my man. A magical fix to our money pit woes? :bang: :jest:
Now that the FAST is out, and that the LS2 is out, and seeing that you could reverse engineer the BOTH of them, it would seem that any number of companies could reduce the cost of R&D by at least 65%. I am sure that many people would love to find a third option out there that mimics the FAST intake. The difficulty is finding a reputable company who has the QC capabilites that people trust, that is willing to undertake this, as well as any possible negative PR for 'copying' a product.
Hopefully you are right and BBK's intake is the golden band-aid for the intake market. We'll see.
Yeah, I am anxious to see the BBK. It sounds decent. And so far, the LS2 intake looks poorly made for airflow from the pictures people are posting. There are definitely additional gains to be made there.
JoeDirt
08-21-2004, 03:24 PM
The bbk unit weighs a ton, is ugly and was poorly finished inside the ports ( atleast the one I saw ) .building it from aluminum was also just plain stupid imo.
I think BBk makes OK mustang parts and I had no problem bolting them on my old mustang but I dont think they have the ability to step up to the ls1 which was 400x better engineered out of the box. :)
Since the LS2 intake requires way too much (let's be realistic here) to convert...
Really?
Another_User
08-21-2004, 04:56 PM
Really?
Yes. Really.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=206693
As far as the BBK piece sucking...I can't believe it is that bad. They have always (as far as I know) make throttle bodies that required larger openings on the intake manifold (without mentioning it prior to purchase), but their craftsmanship has always looked pretty good as far as I could see.
cyphur
08-21-2004, 06:03 PM
Yea, its going to be a PITA to make the LS2 intake fit an ls1 block. different injectors, different fuel rails, there's also the need for a new tb. the injectors alone require o-rings, and the fuel rails require either you specially adapt them for ls1 injectors? and then spacers to amke sure they fit with the taller ls1 injectors.
OR
you can just slice off your current ls1 fuel system toward the back of the block(near where it hits the fuel rails) and convert COMPLETELY over to the ls2 fuel rail system(new rails, new injectors, everything, which would require tuning for the new injectors). also the new injectors have different connections so you would need adaptors for that as well.
either way its a PITA.
Funny how two people can look at the same thread and see two different things.
Oh well.
Another_User
08-22-2004, 03:04 PM
Funny how two people can look at the same thread and see two different things.
Oh well.
If you are referring to my mention of the other thread, I think most would agree that is no simple intake swap. Quite frankly it looks to be a PITA. And I have a strange inkling that there may not be any gains with that intake on a near-stock or light build-up (over an LS6 intake that is).
BuffJoeyD
08-26-2004, 01:45 PM
I know this may not be the same, but for 97-98 vette owners with return style fuel rails the conversion is even harder id imagine =)
cyphur
08-26-2004, 03:41 PM
i remember j-rod making a comment on converting the new ls2 fuel rail system to include a return line....i forget which sponser that has their own aftermarket fuel rails, is it speed inc? should be able to help you with that.....
98TXFBODY
08-26-2004, 03:50 PM
it would be sweet if someone sold a kit to mount a ls2 manifold on a LS1
OWENMUSTANG
08-26-2004, 03:54 PM
see tpis>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ls6 intake w/ 90 mm tb
OWENMUSTANG
08-26-2004, 03:58 PM
well, oval tb
cyphur
08-26-2004, 04:11 PM
98TXFBODY, see KJ@ SDPC's post on the bottom of my thread...here:
http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=204789
they're workin on it :)