Are these Dyno #'s good??
09-01-2004, 04:58 AM
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are these Dyno #'s good?? Ok i just got my car dynoed and tuned and it dynoed at 408 rwhp and 391 rwtq. My mods are stage 2 PP ls6 head, 224/224 .581 112lsa cam, slp lt's, ORY, Borla catback, BBk TB, Slp lid, FTRA, K&N Filter, 160 thermo, KTRE 12bolt with 3.73. It think that is it, I will try to get the Dyno sheet scanned off and on here. I just wanted to know if these are good numbers? I was expecting more but maybe i shouldn't. Also give me some ideas for some more power like bigger cam sizes or anything else. I would like to be 460 plus HP.
thanks
mike
thanks
mike
Last edited by Mike2002; 09-02-2004 at 06:27 AM.
09-01-2004, 05:11 AM
#2
My buddy did 427 rwhp and 404 rwtq with just a cam.
That is alot of money spent for not very much gain... but to each his own. They aren't horrible but for stage 2 Ls6 heads that is a bit low.
That is alot of money spent for not very much gain... but to each his own. They aren't horrible but for stage 2 Ls6 heads that is a bit low.
09-01-2004, 08:03 AM
#4
Originally Posted by ThackerSS
My buddy did 427 rwhp and 404 rwtq with just a cam.
That is alot of money spent for not very much gain... but to each his own. They aren't horrible but for stage 2 Ls6 heads that is a bit low.
That is alot of money spent for not very much gain... but to each his own. They aren't horrible but for stage 2 Ls6 heads that is a bit low.
mike, your numbers are fine and right in line with everyone else who has PP heads and a 224 cam. also keep in mind your through a 12 bolt and 3.73's.
09-01-2004, 11:49 AM
#5
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Macomb, MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThackerSS
My buddy did 427 rwhp and 404 rwtq with just a cam.
That is alot of money spent for not very much gain... but to each his own. They aren't horrible but for stage 2 Ls6 heads that is a bit low.
That is alot of money spent for not very much gain... but to each his own. They aren't horrible but for stage 2 Ls6 heads that is a bit low.
09-01-2004, 11:57 AM
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike, The numbers are maybe a tad low but you must consider that a 12bolt w 3.73's is going to eat up 10-12rwhp @ torque over a stock 10 bolt 3.42 gear. Add 10rwhp and you come in at 418rwhp if you still were running the 10bolt. Can you post us a graph? I am very interested in seeing how the under the curve from your PP LS6 heads @ TR224 compares to my PP 5.3s @ TR224. Congrats on your setup as I know after adding my heads my car was hella more fun to drive everyday.
Trending Topics
09-01-2004, 12:26 PM
#8
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike, it seems like these guys are pretty much telling you what I said. Pretty good numbers through a 12 bolt and a mild cam. Plus he doesn't have a pulley either. Now get that car up here so we can run it against my old ride!
09-01-2004, 12:50 PM
#10
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sanders
Mike, it seems like these guys are pretty much telling you what I said. Pretty good numbers through a 12 bolt and a mild cam. Plus he doesn't have a pulley either. Now get that car up here so we can run it against my old ride!
mike
09-01-2004, 01:20 PM
#11
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those numbers are fine. throw on a pulley and you'll get a little more. most of the big dyno cam only cars are through stock drivetrains and clutches. i, like you, have a very heavy drivetrain and that can make the dyno numbers look a little lower than others. but hey, i like to actually race my car 
09-01-2004, 04:13 PM
#13
Originally Posted by HOSS99
What magical cam or dyno is this? Seems extremely high for Cam only.
419 with full belt, 12 botl rear and 4.10 gears. Cam is a 234 or something similar with 600/610 lift, on a 111
His powerband is NOT peaky. It is above 400rwhp all through his shift point.
Made 404 rwtq also.
09-02-2004, 06:28 AM
#14
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't seem to get the picture to upload because it is to large if anyone wants a copy i will email it to them. I will try to shrink the picture before i go to work tonight.
mike
mike
09-02-2004, 07:08 AM
#15
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Jonesboro, Ga
Posts: 1,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Its my car he is talking about.. Hopefully it'll gain 2-3 horses with the 01-02 heads I'm putting on there.. It had the 99 heads b4. FWIW: I dynod the car with some pretty horribly bent valves (2-3-2) and still did 390rwhp . Hoping to compete at thunder in the cam only class, if all goes well.
Its a "Ron Jeremy" Cam.. ~236/239 .600/.610 111lsa.. And yes, the cam has alot more duration than this guy, so this is an apples and oranges comparison..
Numbers look decent to me. FWIW: My car made 372rwhp with xe-r 224, a 12 bolt, pacesetter headers, and ls1 intake.. So maybe they aren't the STOUTEST dyno numbers I've ever seen.. but run it at the track and see how it does.. Thats what counts. Dyno probably not quite as peaky as my cam only setup either.. Although my dyno looks pretty damn nice.
Good Luck,
Josh
Its a "Ron Jeremy" Cam.. ~236/239 .600/.610 111lsa.. And yes, the cam has alot more duration than this guy, so this is an apples and oranges comparison..
Numbers look decent to me. FWIW: My car made 372rwhp with xe-r 224, a 12 bolt, pacesetter headers, and ls1 intake.. So maybe they aren't the STOUTEST dyno numbers I've ever seen.. but run it at the track and see how it does.. Thats what counts. Dyno probably not quite as peaky as my cam only setup either.. Although my dyno looks pretty damn nice.
Good Luck,
Josh
Last edited by distortion_69; 09-02-2004 at 01:26 PM.
