Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
#1
Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
Hey guys, need a little input from you. I am running in an Open Road Race in June. the Bonnoville 100. It is a 50 miles out and 50 miles back, High speed, time, distance, rally in Wendover Nevada. Part of the event is a 1K standing drag. You run solo for safety reasons. What I need to know is:
Would it be possible for a SS w/ 420RWHP and 400RWTQ be able to hit 140mph inside of that 1Kilometer? I would really like to know if this would be possible. I have run the car in the 1/4 yet but the HP is there to trap 12X. this run is not timed, it is a top speed shootout.
I need to know before I start talking some smack to the other drivers.
Would it be possible for a SS w/ 420RWHP and 400RWTQ be able to hit 140mph inside of that 1Kilometer? I would really like to know if this would be possible. I have run the car in the 1/4 yet but the HP is there to trap 12X. this run is not timed, it is a top speed shootout.
I need to know before I start talking some smack to the other drivers.
#2
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wichita, KS - 1400' above sea level ;-)
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
1 km??? that's so Euro-gay <img border="0" alt="[rainbow]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_rainbow.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
That's like 3000 feet..140 should be a piece of cake even on "road race" tires
That's like 3000 feet..140 should be a piece of cake even on "road race" tires
#3
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
Let's see:
Assuming a drag coefficient of .34
Frontal area of 22 ft^2
Air density @ 7000 ft: ~1.9X10^-3 slugs/ft^3
would give a drag force =
1/2*(density)(A*Cd)*V^2 or
Df = .007106 * V^2 lbs with velocity in ft/s
For example, the drag force at 140 mph would be
140 mph = 205.3 ft/s, Df = 300 lbs
Or at 200 mph, Df = 611 lbs
This is assuming a constant drag coefficient which is probably wrong, I bet it varies somewhat with velocity. These figures would net a theoretical top speed of 215 mph with optimal gearing etc and neglecting frictional losses, so take it with a grain of salt.
So now your resultant force is = force applied by the drive wheels - friction forces - drag forces
Ftotal = Frwtq - Ffriction - Fdrag so then
Acceleration = (Frwtq - Ffriction - Fdrag)/m where m is the mass of the car. The instantaneous force applied by the engine to the tires is
Frwtq = (rwtq) * (Gear ratio final) * (Gear ratio in tranny) / (tire diameter/2)
So now you can open up a spreadsheet, enter your rwtq values in 500 rpm increments or whatever and graph instaneous acceleration in terms of velocity. Since acceleration is the first derivative with respect to time, you can integrate and solve for velocity in terms of time and distance. Or...
You can bring a bottle and not worry about any of the above <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Assuming a drag coefficient of .34
Frontal area of 22 ft^2
Air density @ 7000 ft: ~1.9X10^-3 slugs/ft^3
would give a drag force =
1/2*(density)(A*Cd)*V^2 or
Df = .007106 * V^2 lbs with velocity in ft/s
For example, the drag force at 140 mph would be
140 mph = 205.3 ft/s, Df = 300 lbs
Or at 200 mph, Df = 611 lbs
This is assuming a constant drag coefficient which is probably wrong, I bet it varies somewhat with velocity. These figures would net a theoretical top speed of 215 mph with optimal gearing etc and neglecting frictional losses, so take it with a grain of salt.
So now your resultant force is = force applied by the drive wheels - friction forces - drag forces
Ftotal = Frwtq - Ffriction - Fdrag so then
Acceleration = (Frwtq - Ffriction - Fdrag)/m where m is the mass of the car. The instantaneous force applied by the engine to the tires is
Frwtq = (rwtq) * (Gear ratio final) * (Gear ratio in tranny) / (tire diameter/2)
So now you can open up a spreadsheet, enter your rwtq values in 500 rpm increments or whatever and graph instaneous acceleration in terms of velocity. Since acceleration is the first derivative with respect to time, you can integrate and solve for velocity in terms of time and distance. Or...
You can bring a bottle and not worry about any of the above <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
#4
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong> You can bring a bottle and not worry about any of the above <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just found out from the promoter of the event that "no bottles allowed" <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
<strong> You can bring a bottle and not worry about any of the above <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just found out from the promoter of the event that "no bottles allowed" <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
#5
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by NataSS Inc:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong> You can bring a bottle and not worry about any of the above <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just found out from the promoter of the event that "no bottles allowed" <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It's only cheating if they catch you <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Fenris Ulf:
<strong> You can bring a bottle and not worry about any of the above <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Just found out from the promoter of the event that "no bottles allowed" <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It's only cheating if they catch you <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
#6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wichita, KS - 1400' above sea level ;-)
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
How much altitude? 5000 feet?
Don't assume that just because some car is supercharged (frequently "thrown" on otherwise stock motors) its faster than your well built "heads/cam" car could be. It might be - and it might not be!
Dynojet apparently has already created a routine << example >> using the calcs Fenris described and your actual dyno. Don't forget to have them factor back the HP for the altitude.
Don't assume that just because some car is supercharged (frequently "thrown" on otherwise stock motors) its faster than your well built "heads/cam" car could be. It might be - and it might not be!
Dynojet apparently has already created a routine << example >> using the calcs Fenris described and your actual dyno. Don't forget to have them factor back the HP for the altitude.
#7
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Plum Crazy Rob:
<strong> How much altitude? 5000 feet?
Don't assume that just because some car is supercharged (frequently "thrown" on otherwise stock motors) its faster than your well built "heads/cam" car could be. It might be - and it might not be!
Dynojet apparently has already created a routine << example >> using the calcs Fenris described and your actual dyno. Don't forget to have them factor back the HP for the altitude. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Altitude is around 7000 ft. Unfortunately that dynojet program can't account for gear changes or drag data specific to a certain vehicle. I have several random dynos laying around my house, I will do some excel calcs when I get a chance.
<strong> How much altitude? 5000 feet?
Don't assume that just because some car is supercharged (frequently "thrown" on otherwise stock motors) its faster than your well built "heads/cam" car could be. It might be - and it might not be!
Dynojet apparently has already created a routine << example >> using the calcs Fenris described and your actual dyno. Don't forget to have them factor back the HP for the altitude. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Altitude is around 7000 ft. Unfortunately that dynojet program can't account for gear changes or drag data specific to a certain vehicle. I have several random dynos laying around my house, I will do some excel calcs when I get a chance.
Trending Topics
#8
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wichita, KS - 1400' above sea level ;-)
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
7000 ft in the summer! yikes! You won't make it...
you're talking about 10000-12000 ft density altitude and a dyno de-correction factor of about 0.8...where your 420 RWHP engine makes about 335 RWHP....probably works out to around 130 MPH assuming a perfect launch and some other things that aren't likely to happen. The calculated data will be interesting. I'm too lazy to do the Excel <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<small>[ April 16, 2003, 05:46 PM: Message edited by: Plum Crazy Rob ]</small>
you're talking about 10000-12000 ft density altitude and a dyno de-correction factor of about 0.8...where your 420 RWHP engine makes about 335 RWHP....probably works out to around 130 MPH assuming a perfect launch and some other things that aren't likely to happen. The calculated data will be interesting. I'm too lazy to do the Excel <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<small>[ April 16, 2003, 05:46 PM: Message edited by: Plum Crazy Rob ]</small>
#10
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Land of no Drag Strip
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
I'm at 5,600 feet elevation here. Stock LS1 cars make around 250rwhp, Stock Z06, around 290rwhp, so that should give you some idea of the hit in hp your going to take. At 7000 feet, me thinks a 70 to 80 hp power hit.
#11
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Plum Crazy Rob:
<strong> 1 km??? that's so Euro-gay <img border="0" alt="[rainbow]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_rainbow.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
That's like 3000 feet..140 should be a piece of cake even on "road race" tires </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">its 3281 ft. Dont ask me why they chose 1 KM. Last year they had a supercharged C5 BARELY hit 140mph. I think the altitude may have something to do with it.
<strong> 1 km??? that's so Euro-gay <img border="0" alt="[rainbow]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_rainbow.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
That's like 3000 feet..140 should be a piece of cake even on "road race" tires </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">its 3281 ft. Dont ask me why they chose 1 KM. Last year they had a supercharged C5 BARELY hit 140mph. I think the altitude may have something to do with it.
#13
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: HOU - yeah, you know the rest.
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
I think you'll be able to do it. If you ran the 120 mph trap speeds thru the 1/4(1,320 ft) you still have 1,961 ft to accelerate an additional 20 mph to complete the standing kilometer(3,281 ft). Good luck and have fun! <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
#14
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
Little OT, but Fenris, that is some time consuming math and typing. Thanks for taking the time <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
Boyce,
It will be close for sure. Its misleading. 3k feet, but its at 7k altitude.
Boyce,
It will be close for sure. Its misleading. 3k feet, but its at 7k altitude.
#15
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
the city of Wendover is at 4500ft of elevation. That should help with the equations. I wonder if running my G2 SCCA spoiler will put the drag CD all out of whack. 130mph seems to be where the "wall" of air is, after that its harder to accellerate.
#19
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Objects in mirror no longer matter.
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Hitting 140mph inside 1KM
Even if you hit only 116 mph in the quarter with the elevation you should still break 140 by the time the 1 km mark comes.
1900+ feet is plenty of distance for that extra 2X mph you need. I don't know what was up with that supercharged C5...
1900+ feet is plenty of distance for that extra 2X mph you need. I don't know what was up with that supercharged C5...