Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What did the recent GMHTP say about the SSRA and why no gain??????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2004, 10:30 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
99Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default What did the recent GMHTP say about the SSRA and why no gain??????

Hi...Someone mentioned that the SSRA showed no gains in the recent GMHTP magazine. Can somebody describe what the article said, and why were there no gains? Correct if I'm wrong, but I thought the SSRA is a good product and I'm interested in purchasing it for my TA. If this information is incorrect, I apoligize to Austin Performance. Thanks!
Old 10-16-2004, 10:31 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Gloveperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I believe they had a solid 2 mph increase in the 1/4 mile, if I remember correctly.

-Todd
Old 10-17-2004, 06:19 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
2000TransAm24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

NO SSRA
Run 1- 12.56 @ 106.90 1.78 sixty foot
Run 2- 12.56 @ 106.82 1.77 sixty foot

WITH SSRA
Run 1- 12.54 @ 107.08 1.76 sixty foot
Run 2- 12.62 @ 107.25 1.84 sixty foot

They stated between all runs the car had a 30 minute cool down so the car could be run at the same temperature. They noticed no difference with the seal on or off of the front of the airbox. They said it fit well, and there was not clearance issues and they recommend the SSRA. All this info. was taken directly from GMHTP.
Old 10-17-2004, 06:33 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
SSTYCOON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East
Posts: 420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Andrew
Hi...Someone mentioned that the SSRA showed no gains in the recent GMHTP magazine. Can somebody describe what the article said, and why were there no gains? Correct if I'm wrong, but I thought the SSRA is a good product and I'm interested in purchasing it for my TA. If this information is incorrect, I apoligize to Austin Performance. Thanks!

I think its a good mod especially at the higher speeds. My third gear pulls crazy
I like mine
It gives you the slight edge.
Old 10-18-2004, 08:15 AM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
99Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Maybe GMHTP was right...Is this thing worth the money? Does anybody have any better gains than this? Would it make much of difference on a car with just a few mods? If it improved by 1/10 in 1/4 that would be great!


Originally Posted by 2000TransAm24
NO SSRA
Run 1- 12.56 @ 106.90 1.78 sixty foot
Run 2- 12.56 @ 106.82 1.77 sixty foot

WITH SSRA
Run 1- 12.54 @ 107.08 1.76 sixty foot
Run 2- 12.62 @ 107.25 1.84 sixty foot

They stated between all runs the car had a 30 minute cool down so the car could be run at the same temperature. They noticed no difference with the seal on or off of the front of the airbox. They said it fit well, and there was not clearance issues and they recommend the SSRA. All this info. was taken directly from GMHTP.
Old 10-18-2004, 07:43 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
 
racrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Golds Gym
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you think advertising dollars dont tilt a bias scale....WRONG. This is the same magazine that got a gain with a SLP 85mm mafs. I have the ssra, it pulls like crazy from about 60mph and up. I also picked up a solid 1.5mph in the quarter, in all weather conditions. I couldn't be happier with it. peace, Vic
Old 10-18-2004, 07:46 PM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Full-Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate of SC
Posts: 3,069
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

they only got 2.8hp with the MAF and i can believe that

they didnt get **** from the SSRA but .2mph but hey, every car is different
Old 10-19-2004, 10:45 AM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
99Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

they didnt get **** from the SSRA but .2mph but hey, every car is different[/QUOTE]

I'd like to see a response from Austin Performance on this post! I don't want to have any doubt about buying the SSRA. Tell me GMHTP is wrong
Old 10-19-2004, 12:01 PM
  #9  
Retired Street Racer
iTrader: (49)
 
Matt D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southside
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

gmhtp only gives good reviews for their sponsors...austin performance is not one of their sponsors, but slp is...hmmmm
Old 10-19-2004, 12:29 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WTF is an SSRA, all these damn abbreviations...
Old 10-19-2004, 12:30 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Gloveperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KB99WS6
WTF is an SSRA, all these damn abbreviations...
Super Sucker Ram Air

-Todd
Old 10-19-2004, 02:00 PM
  #12  
Retired Street Racer
iTrader: (49)
 
Matt D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southside
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

www.austinperformanceinc.com
Old 10-19-2004, 05:22 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
 
MachoCamacho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mpls, Minnesota
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have SSRA, my car pulls much more than it did, I have only gone to the track once but I ran 13.454@106.79 with stock tires and just lid/filter/ssra, 95 degrees and humid at the time, but i love it as a product and could definately tell a diff when i got it.
Old 10-19-2004, 05:26 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
KB99WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long island, NY
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks Glove,

so this is very similar to my Brian Greene Ram-Air than I take it...
Old 10-19-2004, 05:29 PM
  #15  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DreamState23x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ssra

I have an ftra like intake with the austin scoop attachment(same thing as the ssra but all metal instead of brital plastic) and I gained 1.5mph in the 1/8th and 2 in the 1/4. I love it and i sanded it down and painted it black so it blends right in with the air dam, most people don't even notice it's there till I show them. Great producted
Old 10-19-2004, 06:16 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

SSRA is sold by our sponsors:

http://www.lmperformance.com/1858/1.html

or

http://www.ls1speed.com/catagory.cfm?catagory=induction
Old 10-19-2004, 06:35 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
ss1le02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Andrew
they didnt get **** from the SSRA but .2mph but hey, every car is different
I'd like to see a response from Austin Performance on this post! I don't want to have any doubt about buying the SSRA. Tell me GMHTP is wrong [/QUOTE]

I just got back into town from a 3 day trip. I don't know what to tell you about GMHTP's article. It has me stumped. The SSRA is the same principle as the other cold air kits out there such as the FTRA and SLP CAI. The difference is that it's larger dimensionally, has a scoop, and is made of plastic. I guess every car is different(GMHTP). I had a friend who put a certain brand of heads and only picked up about 15rwhp when everyone else with these heads was picking up a 30rwhp gain. This happened to me also. I didn't gain one HP from going from my stock LS1 heads to a mild stage1 5.3 head. I'd say 98% of the people that buy it get a noticable gain from it. I believe I have the best product with many testimonials to back it up.

Al
Old 10-19-2004, 06:46 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
daryl2cb@yahoo.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greensburg,PA
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did anyone see what filter they were running? I don't have the ssra but I have the slp ram air, with out the extension and I noticed it at 60+mph, don't doubt it, it works, plus think of down the road, bigger tb,intake,maf, they all add up over time to make a better flowing system, more air is better. Also how bout the gas mileage, anyone see the increase?
Old 10-19-2004, 09:10 PM
  #19  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
99Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Al, Thank you for your response: "I don't know what to tell you about GMHTP's article. It has me stumped." I definately believe your product works. Does GMHTP want to promote the SLP CAI instead? Do you think they are biased about your product? Personally, I think SLP must own a few shares of GMHTP. A lot of their work is done at SLP.
Old 10-19-2004, 09:26 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99Andrew
Personally, I think SLP must own a few shares of GMHTP. A lot of their work is done at SLP.
I agree. It's hard to get a favorable magazine review for product with no sponsor or advertising affiliation. Like the FTRA, the SSRA absolutely needs a good seal with no leakage, otherwise the effectiveness is greatly diminished.
I wonder if they checked the seal (besides by hand or eye) to make sure it was air-tight?


Quick Reply: What did the recent GMHTP say about the SSRA and why no gain??????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 AM.