02WS6Bird

iTrader: (2)

well...im looking at 2 and only 2...SLP or ASP...which one has better quality fabrication and build...they both claim 10 rwhp...and such...they do the same...its just how htey look....and function...

will these fit the 455 stroker i have planned in the future or will they needabe replaced by a specifc pulley for it?

jrp

iTrader: (16)

asp, crank snouts are the same regardless of stroke

Worm

iTrader: (2)

Everyone uses the ASP, not sure why. Any SFI approved pulley should be sufficient, and the pulley will work fine with a different shortblock. Although I don't see why it would matter.

35th SS

iTrader: (2)

asp here on both cars.no problem taking out and putting it back in.

2MuchRiceMakesMeSick

I have ASP, no problems here.

LS1LT1

iTrader: (16)

Go with the ASP.

Matt D

iTrader: (49)

asp

02WS6Bird

iTrader: (2)

SLP's looks like it holds the belt in a bit of a slot...check it out guys?...is that actaully any good?...or it really wont serve any purpose what-so-ever?

thanks all...Keep me posted...and keep 'em (opinions) comin

Adam

02WS6Bird

iTrader: (2)

http://www.slponline.com/view_produc...1&BIG=100221-1

then theres this

http://www.ls1speed.com/catalogimage...S1_pullies.gif

the SLP looks more effective to me....and it looks like it has more improved design

however it says throwing belt is common but since i dont kno about pullies i woudlnt kno if thats true


is the SLP design actually a really good one....any1 kno Pros/Cons?

Lesrace82

iTrader: (8)

With these being elastomer dampers. Is there any harm putting them on aftermarket rotating assemblies? Wouldnt a fluid type damper be better for different harmonics? Maybe im looking at it wrong, but wouldnt there be different harmonics from a stock rotating assembly to a forged set up?

ls1fbod

For SLP u'll be payin for the name....go with asp

PREDATOR-Z

Pulley is not for power or looks, its main purpose (often overlooked) is to absorb bad harmonics, so MARCH will take my vote (fluid dampner).

02WS6Bird

iTrader: (2)

any1 TTT?

LS1LT1

iTrader: (16)

Well for looks no, but most people (with an already smooth running motor that is) DO in fact put a n underdrive pulley on to go quicker/faster, no?

2MuchRiceMakesMeSick

Yeah, thats why I got it. It might take .1 .2 tenths off. It will also smooth out the harmonics as well.

P Mack

iTrader: (6)

I ordered the march pulley. A fluid damper for less than the ASP pulley, can't beat that (sdpc had them on sale). I don't know if i'd say it's not for looks, the stock pulley looks so crappy. If nothing else, i think it's easier to use the a harmonic balancer puller than a 3 arm puller, so that's a plus. Hey Ali G, why'd you take your mod list down?

02WS6Bird

iTrader: (2)

is there tuning needed after the install of either pulley?...or no

doesn't seem like it but thats what i said about LT's lol

Fast Eddie's 02 T/A vert.

I have the ASP pulley, I've never had a problem with belts coming off or anything like that. I took a tenth off my 1/8 mi. time.

LS1LT1

iTrader: (16)

No, no tuning required but if I were going to be getting tuned soon anyway I would be sure to put it on before just in case.

PREDATOR-Z

What I meant was that we sould base our pulley choice on:
1- Harmonic absorbtion (the most important function) remember KR problems with ASP old design???
2- power
3- looks
4-weight (negligent as it is centrifugal weight)