Torquer Camshaft Dyno Results Within!!
11-22-2004, 07:32 PM
#1
Torquer Camshaft Dyno Results Within!! Sorry guys I took so long!
Here is 2 graphs I recovered from my laptop!
I'm going to be running a crazy special on torquer & 231.237 camshafts starting Friday
Here is 2 graphs I recovered from my laptop!
I'm going to be running a crazy special on torquer & 231.237 camshafts starting Friday
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
11-22-2004, 09:05 PM
#3
Originally Posted by black_knight
What heads are these runs on? Stock? (and, if so, stock what? Stock Z06 or 98-00 or 01-02?)
if there the same head castings, then it goes to show you the tq gains from a TD setup over a catback. the TD's hit 350rwhp 500 rpm faster then the catback combo.
11-23-2004, 12:03 AM
#4
I've been thinking about getting this cam...just been waiting on dyno's. Is the car a m6 or a4? Was this on stock heads? The first graph the TQ isn't that great...the 2nd graph is more like it....that is why its named the torquer cam right?...Because its supposed to make good tq numbers?
Last edited by BadManLS1; 11-23-2004 at 12:09 AM.
11-23-2004, 09:35 AM
#7
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jrp, I can't believe the difference between the TDs and the cat-back. The whole curve shifted. I was thinking of going TDs, now I am sold. What were the headers on the TD car?
Trending Topics
11-23-2004, 11:57 AM
#9
Guys both cars are stock head f-bodies. I never really paid much attention to the torque differences in the two setups. Mainly I just wanted to give you guys a couple graphs from recent installs. The cars were running pacesetter headers.
We have the Torquer & 231.237 camshaft specials coming up this week
We have the Torquer & 231.237 camshaft specials coming up this week
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
11-23-2004, 11:59 AM
#10
The first car was a 99, the second graph was a 01 car
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
11-23-2004, 10:45 PM
#14
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clear Lake Area, TX
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2MCHPWR
great numbers.
some off the higher #'s from the true dual setup can also be attributed to the better 01 heads (241 castings). JMHO.
some off the higher #'s from the true dual setup can also be attributed to the better 01 heads (241 castings). JMHO.
Anyone have an opinion of this cam in an MN6 GTO?? Assume, LT Headers and stock exhaust.
11-23-2004, 11:40 PM
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man that looks pretty good. Seems like it would be a nice cam for a daily driver, probably run 342s on a m6 pretty decent by the looks of it. May just have to order some pacesetters/TDs instead of holding out for the kooks/qtp.... then get the cam...
for those wondering... (from TSP's site) its 233/233 .589/.589 112 LSA
for those wondering... (from TSP's site) its 233/233 .589/.589 112 LSA
11-24-2004, 12:35 PM
#18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2MCHPWR is correct about the better numbers out of the 01 241 castings over the first graph. The added scavenging of the X pipe also helped the numbers out too but not as much as the combo of better heads and the X pipe. I would like to see the car in the 1st graph have the 241 heads also. A real "Under the Curve" comparison of Y vs X could be made. Those are good numbers and the Torquer curve is very nice.
11-24-2004, 07:36 PM
#19
Originally Posted by Ryan02SS
2MCHPWR is correct about the better numbers out of the 01 241 castings over the first graph. The added scavenging of the X pipe also helped the numbers out too but not as much as the combo of better heads and the X pipe. I would like to see the car in the 1st graph have the 241 heads also. A real "Under the Curve" comparison of Y vs X could be made. Those are good numbers and the Torquer curve is very nice.
the 99' car also has a pulley which is worth ~10rwhp.
11-24-2004, 08:02 PM
#20
LSxGuy widda 9sec Mustang
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas and Qatar
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Checkout the Torquer & 231.237 pricing on special!! $310!!!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/sponsor-sales-specials/242609-crazy-holiday-camshaft-specials-310-texas-speed-performance.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/sponsor-sales-specials/242609-crazy-holiday-camshaft-specials-310-texas-speed-performance.html