New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Question on 0-60 times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2004, 11:19 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oswego, NY
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Question on 0-60 times

I always see posted quarter mile times and trap speeds but does anybody know what their cars are doing 0-60 in after some mods? For example, what would a 350 or 400 rwhp T/A do 0-60 in assuming decent tires and peak conditions?
Old 12-04-2004, 11:47 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Gloveperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Aragorn
I always see posted quarter mile times and trap speeds but does anybody know what their cars are doing 0-60 in after some mods? For example, what would a 350 or 400 rwhp T/A do 0-60 in assuming decent tires and peak conditions?
With 400RWHP and nittos..low 4's probably. 1/8 of a mile is a good representation though.
Old 12-04-2004, 12:17 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

There was a excel sheet somewhere that figured that out. On my 11.6 run it said 3.5 seconds to 60 mph.
Old 12-04-2004, 12:52 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My best 0-60 is a 4.0 , I consistently run 4.1's with et streets and 4.3-4.4 on street tires. I wanna go and try it in this colder weather and maybe get some 3's I use a g-timer. Its very accurate with the track and much more so than the gtech.
Old 12-04-2004, 06:15 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

this might be helpful...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...highlight=0-60

The search button ownz...
Old 12-04-2004, 06:22 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That doesnt seem to work well with my times ??
Old 12-04-2004, 09:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
TX_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Plano
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

this **** dont work....with my times.... so i ran 4.6....0-60mph??
Old 12-04-2004, 10:57 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
 
BlueSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How does it now work? It's not a calculator that predicts the car's capability, more the driver's ability.
Old 12-04-2004, 11:25 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueSix
How does it now work? It's not a calculator that predicts the car's capability, more the driver's ability.
I dont get what your saying? The driver's ability is pretty unpredictable isnt it? I dont see how you could calculate that? The car itself is more predictable is it not?


This is the part I was curious about....


1.9 second 60' time = 43.0 mph @60' = 4.6 second 0-60 time
1.8 second 60' time = 45.5 mph @60' = 4.0 second 0-60 time

I have never pulled a 1.8 60' put I have pulled some

1.92 which = 4.0 for me
2.0 = 4.6

I dunno just an observation.
Old 12-05-2004, 11:25 AM
  #10  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

This is the problem...

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
That's assuming a linear accerleration rate.

Some people are limited by traction and bog in the first 60' that gets made up past there, specifically m6's with 3.42s.

But interesting still.
I'd like to know what GM rated our cars from the factory.
Old 12-05-2004, 11:43 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
redbeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oak Park Illinois
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The last shootout between the SS and COBRA clocked the M6 SS at 0-60 at 5.2. It was either Motortrend or Car and Driver.The fastest I've read a (TA) LS1 go was 0-60 was 5.0 flat. I believe it was Car and Driver.
Old 12-05-2004, 12:04 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DMNSPD

I'd like to know what GM rated our cars from the factory.
I believe 5.1 or 5.2 is what gm rated them.


There ya go Ill make it easy for ya z98.

Last edited by Tiger2o69; 12-06-2004 at 07:41 PM.
Old 12-05-2004, 12:09 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Gloveperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tiger2o69
I believe 5.1 or 5.2 is what gm rated them.
That's with 300 RWHP..not 400
Old 12-05-2004, 12:22 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gloveperson
That's with 300 RWHP..not 400
Huh? Where did 400 Come from?
Old 12-05-2004, 12:39 PM
  #15  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what would a 350 or 400 rwhp T/A do 0-60 in assuming decent tires and peak conditions?
Huh? Where did 400 Come from?
R > C > P
Old 12-05-2004, 12:42 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DMNSPD
This is the problem...



I'd like to know what GM rated our cars from the factory.
Oh, thats way up there lol. I was answering this guys question.

R>C>P ?
Old 12-05-2004, 09:00 PM
  #17  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It means READ -> COMPREHEND -> THEN POST
Old 12-05-2004, 09:05 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Gloveperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DMNSPD
I'd like to know what GM rated our cars from the factory.
my father has old brochures at his house..when i go visit i will be sure to look!

(ever like to read the review of the Road and track 64 Mustang and 67 Camaro )
Old 12-06-2004, 02:08 AM
  #19  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z98
It means READ -> COMPREHEND -> THEN POST
haha kinda funny how if wasnt me that missed something.
Old 12-06-2004, 11:27 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
 
MillaTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cornwall, NY
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiger2o69
haha kinda funny how if wasnt me that missed something.
Original poster asked what 0-60mph times a 400RWHP f-body had...

0-60 times rely on too many inconsistant variables to be really accurate, and actually mean something, IMO. Its all about the driver.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.