TSP's New 233/239 .603/.600 Camshaft ! ! !
12-13-2004, 10:48 AM
#1
TSP's New 233/239 .603/.600 Camshaft ! ! ! Texas Speed is proud to now offer the 233/239 .603/.600 112+2 LS1 Camshaft
Designed off our 231.237 camshaft, the 233/239 cam offers great performance for customers wanting big power with good p/v clearance!
The 233/239 camshaft features slightly more aggressive lobes than the 231.237 camshaft, but will still work with a single springs such as the 918!
Testing has shown 50+rwhp gains from stock camshafts, and a 18+rwhp gain over a 230/227 camshaft!
The 233/239 lobe design also helps to give the camshaft good piston to valve clearance. The camshafts lobes will also work well for customers wanting to run it with a bigger valve setup such as the PRC Stage 2.5 5.3L heads!!
The 233/239 .603"/.600" camshaft will be on special for $310 from now to Christmas!!
Designed off our 231.237 camshaft, the 233/239 cam offers great performance for customers wanting big power with good p/v clearance!
The 233/239 camshaft features slightly more aggressive lobes than the 231.237 camshaft, but will still work with a single springs such as the 918!
Testing has shown 50+rwhp gains from stock camshafts, and a 18+rwhp gain over a 230/227 camshaft!
The 233/239 lobe design also helps to give the camshaft good piston to valve clearance. The camshafts lobes will also work well for customers wanting to run it with a bigger valve setup such as the PRC Stage 2.5 5.3L heads!!
The 233/239 .603"/.600" camshaft will be on special for $310 from now to Christmas!!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
12-13-2004, 02:47 PM
#5
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, I like the looks of this cam. I'm definately getting a cam package from you guys before Christmas but there's so many to choose! 
Started out wanting the Torquer, then figured I would be happier with the 231/237 then started to read the MS3 fit stock heads as well and had my mind set on it.... NOW this cam looks pretty sweet Guess you guys will be getting a call from me with in the next week with a few questions.
When using the formula to determine the cam "lope" that I found in another thread in this forum... I come to a value of 16 v/s 13.5 with the MS3. Am I correct in using 110 for LSA since it's 112+2 or am I wrong? I know it sounds vain but I'm really wanting a cam that sounds plain evil at idle
Started out wanting the Torquer, then figured I would be happier with the 231/237 then started to read the MS3 fit stock heads as well and had my mind set on it.... NOW this cam looks pretty sweet Guess you guys will be getting a call from me with in the next week with a few questions.When using the formula to determine the cam "lope" that I found in another thread in this forum... I come to a value of 16 v/s 13.5 with the MS3. Am I correct in using 110 for LSA since it's 112+2 or am I wrong? I know it sounds vain but I'm really wanting a cam that sounds plain evil at idle
Trending Topics
12-13-2004, 03:53 PM
#10
TECH Resident
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
why would you need to change the piston?
Stocker's fine.
Stocker's fine.
12-13-2004, 04:01 PM
#12
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LS1SS4ever
May be of high lift or the compression. I don't know how many hp can the stock piston can handles, but I hear that it's not strong
The compression ratio shouldn't change unless you use dish/domed pistons and/or different head gaskets or milled heads etc etc. Just swapping out cam's wouldn't effect it.I think the stock pistons are plenty strong enough, too many people out there running a butt load of horsepower on stock shortblocks
12-13-2004, 04:32 PM
#13
Launching!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: miami
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
How much gain over the good ol' 231/237?
12-13-2004, 04:37 PM
#14
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just put this cam in my car and its very driveable on the street and has a KILLER sound, my old cam was an MTI X1 (230/227) and I made over 18 more rwhp with stock heads, LS1 manifold and stock TB
Jason...its a badass cam, thanks
Zach
Jason...its a badass cam, thanks
Zach
12-13-2004, 04:38 PM
#15
Originally Posted by nspr8td lt1
18rwhp. no flycutting needed on stock heads. i dont remember if you said your 5.3's were milled. are they?
I would expect with such a small difference in duration and lift between the 231/237 and 233/239 that the difference would be somewhere around 5-10 rwhp max...
Last edited by Tranzor_Z28; 12-13-2004 at 05:02 PM.
12-13-2004, 04:57 PM
#18
Launching!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: miami
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tranzor_Z28
They said they gamed 18 rwhp over a 230/227 camshaft, not a 231/237.
I would expect with such a small difference in duration and lift between the 231/237 and 233/239 that the difference would be somewhere around 5-10 rwhp max...
I would expect with such a small difference in duration and lift between the 231/237 and 233/239 that the difference would be somewhere around 5-10 rwhp max...
carlos, why dont you get a LG cam?
12-13-2004, 05:04 PM
#19
Originally Posted by nharrison02ss
sounds like this may be the one for me. Is this cam a pavement pounder at idle, cause that is what I want. I want it to thump like the hot cam well a little harder than that.
