Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS1 HP Ratings

Old 01-03-2005, 09:41 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dwhiteZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS1 HP Ratings

Are LS1 F-body and corvette HP ratings net or gross (flywheel)? If net, I would expect the rear hp dyno values to be close to the advertised HP. That seems to be the case since if i recall correctly, most 4th Gen LS1 F-Bodies dyno stock close to 300 RHP. If net, then what would the pre-1971 equivalent flywheel HP be? Thanks.
Old 01-03-2005, 09:43 PM
  #2  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

net but underated in the fbody.
Old 01-04-2005, 10:14 AM
  #3  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The way they used "hand-built" engines with no air cleaner, no accessories, and "tubular manifolds" for those tests, LS1's would probably have been rated 400+ back in the day
Old 01-06-2005, 07:57 AM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dwhiteZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Then how is "net" defined, i.e. is it equivalent to dyno HP or does it carry another definition? Thanks..
Old 01-06-2005, 08:17 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
Black Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dwhiteZ28
Then how is "net" defined, i.e. is it equivalent to dyno HP or does it carry another definition? Thanks..
Net is engine dyno with all the crap hooked up, i.e., belts, accessories, etc. Gross is engine bare naked. Then there's chassis dyno...
Old 01-06-2005, 03:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i read somewhere that if you used the old gross rating the ls1 would be around 400 hp.i would say this is pretty accurate seeing how most bone stock ls1 f-bodys run around mid 13 sec. at the strip.
Old 01-06-2005, 03:28 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Black Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66deuce
i read somewhere that if you used the old gross rating the ls1 would be around 400 hp.i would say this is pretty accurate seeing how most bone stock ls1 f-bodys run around mid 13 sec. at the strip.
You're right. Check out this web site where they dynoed a bunch of different Mustangs from the late 60s. It's Interesting (and funny) to see what the 'real' rwhp is on some of these 'muscle' cars.
http://www.ncinternet.net/~durham/dynoshop.html
Old 01-06-2005, 03:50 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black Z/28
You're right. Check out this web site where they dynoed a bunch of different Mustangs from the late 60s. It's Interesting (and funny) to see what the 'real' rwhp is on some of these 'muscle' cars.
http://www.ncinternet.net/~durham/dynoshop.html
yeah,the only muscle cars that i can think of that had as much or more power than the ls1 cars were big block cars.hell,even some V6 motors of today make almost as much power as some old small blocks of the 60s.
Old 01-13-2005, 08:12 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
dwhiteZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black Z/28
Net is engine dyno with all the crap hooked up, i.e., belts, accessories, etc. Gross is engine bare naked. Then there's chassis dyno...
Thanks..but then I ran across this entry in the Camaro White Book, page 43 which reads, "Horsepower ratings changed in 1971 from gross to net (output at the rear wheels, allowing for accessory and driveline losses." Now this sounds more like dyno RWHP. What gives?
Old 01-13-2005, 09:57 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When most cars get their horsepower ratings from the factory, its at the flywheel. Pure and simple.
Old 01-13-2005, 03:12 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
Black Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dwhiteZ28
Thanks..but then I ran across this entry in the Camaro White Book, page 43 which reads, "Horsepower ratings changed in 1971 from gross to net (output at the rear wheels, allowing for accessory and driveline losses." Now this sounds more like dyno RWHP. What gives?
No, I don't think that's right. They changed from engine without accessories (Zero load) to engine with FULL accessories and exhaust. This means all accessories (Alternator, AC, PS, etc. & full exhaust w/cats and muffler(s), etc.
Old 01-13-2005, 04:48 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
John_D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon TN
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

There was a time when they rated the engines at the rear wheels... That didn't last long though, maybe 10 years.

For example, my 1978 Trans Am, with the 403 cid California engine, was rated at only 180 hp. But that thing would fly.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: LS1 HP Ratings



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.