Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

bore and stroke combinations sbc bbc vs. gen III

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2005, 01:46 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
texada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: alexandria, La
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default bore and stroke combinations sbc bbc vs. gen III

I want you guys to chime in on this topic. It seems to me that the ole' sbc and bbc have bigger bores and shorter strokes. Do ya'll think that the generation III bore and stroke combo's are better than the ole' sbc and bbc? The genIII engines have longer strokesand smaller bore (strokers). For example 382ci 3.90x4.0 inch stroke; 402 4.0 bore x 4.0 inch stroke: 427 4.125 x4.00. It seem to me the older sbc bbc have better bore x stroke combinations than the genIII engines. Chime in and give some pointers. Which will perform best
Old 01-08-2005, 04:25 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
v8pwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I would point out the great cylinder heads of the genIII as the reason for the change in bore and stroke . From an OEM perspective why spin higher rpms when you can trade bore for increased stroke and make power everywhere in the rpm range .
Old 01-08-2005, 05:10 PM
  #3  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

4.200 x 4.000 = 443 cid good all motor
4.160 x 4.000 = 435 cid
4.160 x 4.125 = 449 cid
4.200 x 4.250 = 471 cid
4.200 x 3.620 = 401 cid high rev combo
Old 01-09-2005, 12:05 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (82)
 
Ratical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rotterdam, New York
Posts: 998
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
4.200 x 4.000 = 443 cid good all motor
4.160 x 4.000 = 435 cid
4.160 x 4.125 = 449 cid
4.200 x 4.250 = 471 cid
4.200 x 3.620 = 401 cid high rev combo
In comparison some smallblock/bigblock combinations are:
4.500 x 4.50 = 572 cid
4.500 x 4.25 = 540 cid
4.250 x 4.00 = 454 cid
4.250 x 3.76 = 427 cid
4.030 x 3.75 = 383 cid
4.125 x 3.58 = 377 cid
4.125 x 3.75 = 400 cid
4.000 x 3.58 = 350 cid
4.000 x 3.31 = 327 cid

Another factor is the connecting rods.
A gen III comes stock with a 6.098 rod

Some old small block stock rod lengths were 5.7",(most engines) and 5.565"(400sb)

Big blocks used one length stock, 6.135".

I agree that the Gen III heads are the secret to their power. A stock LS1 head will outflow most aftermarket smallblock chevy heads out there. Most aftermarket big block chevy heads will flow more cfm than an LS1 head, but their low lift velocity numbers and swirl do not compare.

Now if only GM would make an aluminum Gen VII big block with LSx technology heads!
Old 01-09-2005, 12:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Now if only GM would make an aluminum Gen VII big block with LSx technology heads!
Gen 7 (ouch). 10 more years?/

No I vote for a LS2 Gen IV Z28 and a LS7 Gen V SS.



Quick Reply: bore and stroke combinations sbc bbc vs. gen III



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.